Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Mr Jack Straw 1 Contents Written evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 2 1. Letter from Vera Productions Ltd to Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC MP, 10 February 2015, handed to the Commissioner by Sir Malcolm on 5 March 2015 2 2. Article from Daily Telegraph (on-line) 23 February 2015 4 3. Script from Dispatches ‘Politicians for Hire’, 23 February 2015 6 4. Transcript of interview with Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC MP on the Today programme on 23 February 2015 27 5. Letter from the Commissioner to Sir Malcom Rifkind QC MP, 26 February 2015 30 6. Letter from the Commissioner to Vera Productions Ltd, 26 February 2015 32 7. Letter from the Commissioner to the Editor of the Daily Telegraph, 26 February 2015 32 8. Letter from Sir Malcom Rifkind QC MP to the Commissioner, 27 February 2015 33 9. Statement by Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC MP handed to the Commissioner by Sir Malcolm on 5 March 2015 33 10. Emails between Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC MP and ‘PMR Communications’, November 2014 – January 2015 38 11. Letter from Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC MP to the Commissioner 10 March 2015 43 12. Enclosures with letter of 10 March 2015: emails between Sir Malcolm & Vera Productions in advance of the Dispatches programme 43 13. Transcript of interview: ‘PMR Communications’ with Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC MP on 7 January 2015, provided to the Commissioner on 20 April 2015 46 14. Transcript of interview: ‘PMR Communications’ with Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC MP on 13 January 2015, received by the Commissioner on 20 April 2015 78 15. Letter from the Commissioner to Sir Malcolm Rifkind, 28 April 2015 109 16. Email from Sir Malcolm Rifkind to the Commissioner, 4 May 2015 110 17. Attachment to email of 4 May: Sir Malcolm’s response to transcripts 111 18. Letter from the Commissioner to Sir Malcolm Rifkind, 1 June 2015 114 19. Email from Sir Malcolm Rifkind to the Commissioner, 4 June 2015 115 20. Attachment to the email of 4 June 2015, Sir Malcolm’s comments on the Dispatches script 115 21. Letter from the Commissioner to the Registrar, 9 June 2015 117 22. Email from Sir Malcolm Rifkind to the Commissioner, 11 June 2015 119 23. Attachment to the email of 11 June 2015: comments in advance of meeting the Commissioner 119 24. Letter from the Registrar to the Commissioner, 12 June 2015 120 25. Transcription of Interview between the Commissioner and Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC, 15 June 2015 121 26. Letter from the Commissioner to Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC, 1 July 2015 143 27. Email from Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC to the Commissioner, 4 July 2015 143 28. Sir Malcom’s entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests as at 23 February 2015 144 Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Mr Jack Straw 2 Written evidence received by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards 1. Letter from Vera Productions Ltd to Sir Malcolm Rifkind QC MP, 10 February 2015, handed to the Commissioner by Sir Malcolm on 5 March 2015 I am writing to you from Vera Productions, an independent television production company. 1 wish to inform you that we are producing a half-hour programme for Channel 4's flagship current affairs strand, "Dispatches", which is currently scheduled for broadcast at 20:00hrs on 23 February 2015. This programme is an examination of the private financial interests of Members of Parliament and whether they act appropriately in maintaining the proper distinction between those interests and their duties as a Member of Parliament and whether the functions they carry out on behalf of those private interests are in keeping with the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament. The programme refers back to Channel4's "Politicians for Hire", a Dispatches programme, first broadcast on 22 March 2010. ln that programme, a number of MPs were featured applying for positions on a fictitious American Company's advisory board. The company was in fact a front for undercover journalists working for Channel 4. The MPs made a number of claims to the journalists about how they could help the American company and, in some cases, examples of the help they had given to other clients. Their behaviour was subsequently the subject of an investigation by Parliament's Standards Commissioner who made a number of criticisms in a report published on 9 December 2010. Senior politicians also spoke out criticising the MPs' behaviour and calling for an overhaul of the regulations in relation to lobbying. This current programme investigates whether the situation has changed five years later. The programme features an approach made to a number of MPs by a Chinese Communications company – PMR Communications - in order to discuss whether they would be interested in joining the company's advisory board and consult on planned investments in the UK and other EU countries. PMR Communications was in fact a fictitious company and its representatives were undercover reporters. The reporters secretly filmed the meetings in order to gather evidence that will feature in the programme. The meetings with PMR Communications you attended in Grosvenor Street, one on 7 January, the other on 13 January are to feature in the programme. In the interests of fairness and accuracy, we are writing to give you the opportunity to respond to evidence that we have obtained. Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Mr Jack Straw 3 We have provided in this letter a detailed and comprehensive list of all significant allegations and matters which, subject to your response, we currently intend to include in the programme. The programme will also include an interview with Sir Alistair Graham, the former Chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life. Sir Alistair viewed footage of your two meetings with PMR and also read the full transcriptions of both meetings. He then appraised and commented on some of the statements you made in the meetings. Material for broadcast for which we invite your response The filming, interviews and research for this programme have revealed evidence of the following matters: 1. That you corresponded with, and met representatives of PMR without first carrying out due diligence on the company. 2. That you demonstrated yourself as willing to act as an MP "for hire", using your position and contacts gained in that position for personal gain; in particular (a) That you offered to host PMR in a private business meeting in your parliamentary office and provide a personal tour of Parliament for the representative's "uncle". (b) That you claimed you could facilitate access to any foreign ambassador in the UK “in a way that is useful". (c) That you said you could write to a minister on PMR's behalf, but wouldn't name on whose behalf you were asking, and that you could take soundings on e.g. future plans regarding HS3. (d) That your fee, if you were to work for PMR, would be similar to fees you had earned in the past. You defined this as being in the region of 5,000 to £8,000 for part of a day. 3. Your comments in the meetings gave the impression that you were not applying yourself fully to your duties as an MP; in particular Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Mr Jack Straw 4 (a) you claimed you have a lot of free time; you didn’t work for any one person full-time; you were self-employed and that nobody pays you a salary. (b) you suggested that the time from Thursday evening to Monday lunchtime was for you “quiet time”. On the basis of our inquiries, we believe that your voting record of 52% is among the bottom ten per cent of all MPs. 4. In relation to these matters, Sir Alistair expresses the view: (a) That MPs are not self-employed; they receive a salary; that for most it is a full-time job. He thought your constituents would be appalled that you seem to have so much free time and that rather than representing your constituents you appear to be putting in such efforts to boost your income. (b) That not naming a company on whose behalf you were writing to ask a question would be a clear breach of the MPs' Code of Conduct and behaviour that the public would find totally unacceptable. In the interests of fairness, the programme will include your comments that you would not be able to attend PMR meetings if they conflicted with an important vote in the House of Commons. We will also include your clarification that you were not offering access to any privileged or secret information. We are now approaching the final stages of editing. This letter has been sent to give you a fair opportunity to respond to the matters set out above in a written statement by 18 February 201 5 at the latest, in order to ensure that your response can be fairly and accurately reflected in the programme. We may fairly edit any such response for broadcast in accordance with the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. I can be contacted at the numbers and email address given below. I look forward to hearing from you. 10 February 2015 2. Article from Daily Telegraph (on-line) 23 February 2015 Two former foreign secretaries are exposed for their involvement in a new “cash for access” scandal. Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Mr Jack Straw 5 Jack Straw and Sir Malcolm Rifkind offered to use their positions as politicians on behalf of a fictitious Chinese company in return for payments of at least £5,000 per day. Sir Malcolm, who oversees Britain’s intelligence agencies on behalf of Parliament, said he could arrange “useful access” to every British ambassador in the world because of his status.