Evaluation Design Report (Revised) – 9 February 2016

Evaluation Design Report (Revised) – 9 February 2016

Evaluation Design Report (Revised) – 9 February 2016 EVALUATION DESIGN REPORT Ex-Post Performance Evaluation in the Education Sector; Phase I – Morocco PREPARED BY: International Solutions Group PREPARED FOR: Millennium Challenge Corporation Contact Us Brian O’Callaghan, Director of Programs @theisg.com · www.theisg.com Evaluation Design Report (Revised) – 9 February 2016 EVALUATION DESIGN REPORT Ex-Post Performance Evaluation in the Education Sector; Phase I – Morocco Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of MCC or any other U.S. Government entity International Solutions Group www.theisg.com 1 Evaluation Design Report (Revised) – 9 February 2016 Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2. COUNTRY CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.1. Artisan and the Fez Medina (AFM) Project, Vocational Training Activity ......................................... 5 1.2.2. Functional Literacy and Vocational Training (FLVT) Activity............................................................ 6 1.3. OBJECTIVES OF THE EVALUATION DESIGN REPORT ...................................................................................... 7 1.4. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 8 2. FLVT PROJECT OVERVIEW AND THE INTERVENTIONS TO BE EVALUATED ......................... 10 2.1. FLVT PROJECT OVERVIEW: FUNCTIONAL LITERACY (FL) ......................................................................... 10 2.1.1. FL sub-Activity Logic ........................................................................................................................ 10 2.1.2. FL Participants/Beneficiaries ........................................................................................................... 12 2.1.3. FL Locations ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1.4. FL Indicators, Targets, and Reported Achievements ......................................................................... 13 2.1.5. MCA-Morocco Suggested FL Evaluation Methodology .................................................................... 14 2.2. FLVT PROJECT OVERVIEW: VOCATIONAL TRAINING (VT) ........................................................................ 15 2.2.1. VT sub-Activity Logic ........................................................................................................................ 15 2.2.2. VT Participants/Beneficiaries ........................................................................................................... 16 2.2.3. VT Locations ..................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2.4. VT Indicators, Targets, and Reported Achievements ......................................................................... 17 2.2.5. MCA-Morocco Suggested VT Evaluation Methodology .................................................................... 19 2.3. FLVT PROJECT OVERVIEW: QUALIFICATIONS AND COMPETENCIES (PEAQC) .......................................... 19 2.3.1. PEAQC sub-Activity Logic ................................................................................................................ 19 2.3.2. PEAQC Participants/Beneficiaries ................................................................................................... 20 2.3.3. PEAQC Locations ............................................................................................................................. 20 2.3.4. PEAQC Indicators, Targets, and Reported Achievements ................................................................. 20 2.3.5. MCA-Morocco Suggested PEAQC Evaluation Methodology ........................................................... 22 2.4. FLVT PROJECT OVERVIEW: ECONOMIC RATES O F RETURN (ERR) ............................................................ 22 2.4.1. FLVT Economic Rates of Return by Components ............................................................................. 22 3. LITERATURE/DESK AND FIELD REVIEW ........................................................................................ 23 3.1. DESK AND FIELD REVIEW .......................................................................................................................... 23 3.2. SUMMARY OF DESK REVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.1. Baseline Data to Support Claims of the Problem .............................................................................. 25 3.2.2. Indicators for Monitoring Project Results......................................................................................... 26 3.2.3. FLVT Project Inputs, Outputs and Outcomes .................................................................................... 26 3.3. GAPS IN DESK REVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 27 3.3.1. Reporting and Evaluation of Income and Employment Indicators ................................................... 27 3.3.2. Gender Strategy ................................................................................................................................ 28 3.4 BEST PRACTICES AND LESSONS LEARNED .................................................................................................. 29 4. EVALUATION DESIGN .......................................................................................................................... 30 4.1. EX-POST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: TERMINOLOGY ............................................................................. 30 4.1.1. Evaluation Challenges ...................................................................................................................... 31 4.2. EVALUATION SUGGESTIONS FROM MCC .................................................................................................... 31 4.2.1. Functional Literacy Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 33 4.2.2. Vocational Training Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 35 4.2.3. PEAQC Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 40 4.2.4. ERR Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 41 4.2.5. Summary of Evaluations.................................................................................................................... 42 4.2.6 Evaluation Instruments ...................................................................................................................... 42 4.2.7. Selection of Beneficiary Participants ................................................................................................ 44 International Solutions Group www.theisg.com 2 Evaluation Design Report (Revised) – 9 February 2016 4.2.8. Summary of Project and Program Indicators ................................................................................... 44 4.2.9 Data Arrays ........................................................................................................................................ 46 5. EVALUATION WORK PLAN ................................................................................................................. 48 5.1. EVALUATION TEAM .................................................................................................................................... 54 5.5 Staffing Plan .......................................................................................................................................... 55 6. BUDGET .................................................................................................................................................. 56 ANNEX 1: MOROCCO IN-COUNTRY VISIT SCHEDULE AND INFORMANT MEETINGS .............. 58 ANNEX 2: REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 59 ANNEX 3: CONTACT AND APPOINTMENT SCHEDULE FORM ......................................................... 61 ANNEX 4: SUMMARY OF AVAILABLE DATABASES ............................................................................ 62 International Solutions Group www.theisg.com 3 Evaluation Design Report (Revised) – 9 February 2016 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AFM Artisan and Fez Medina Project (Artisanat Fès Médina Projet) APP Agency for Partnership & Progress (Agence du Partenariat pour le Progrès) CBA Competency-Based Approach CFA Center of Apprentice Training (Centre

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    63 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us