Why One Species in New Zealand, Pugetia Delicatissima (Kallymeniaceae, Rhodophyta), Should Become Two New Genera, Judithia Gen. Nov

Why One Species in New Zealand, Pugetia Delicatissima (Kallymeniaceae, Rhodophyta), Should Become Two New Genera, Judithia Gen. Nov

European Journal of Phycology ISSN: 0967-0262 (Print) 1469-4433 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tejp20 Why one species in New Zealand, Pugetia delicatissima (Kallymeniaceae, Rhodophyta), should become two new genera, Judithia gen. nov. and Wendya gen. nov. Roberta D’Archino, Showe-Mei Lin, Paul W. Gabrielson & Giuseppe C. Zuccarello To cite this article: Roberta D’Archino, Showe-Mei Lin, Paul W. Gabrielson & Giuseppe C. Zuccarello (2015): Why one species in New Zealand, Pugetia delicatissima (Kallymeniaceae, Rhodophyta), should become two new genera, Judithia gen. nov. and Wendya gen. nov., European Journal of Phycology, DOI: 10.1080/09670262.2015.1104557 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2015.1104557 View supplementary material Published online: 01 Dec 2015. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tejp20 Download by: [Niwa] Date: 02 December 2015, At: 19:05 Eur. J. Phycol. (2015), 1–16 Why one species in New Zealand, Pugetia delicatissima (Kallymeniaceae, Rhodophyta), should become two new genera, Judithia gen. nov. and Wendya gen. nov. ROBERTA D’ARCHINO1, SHOWE-MEI LIN2, PAUL W. GABRIELSON3 AND GIUSEPPE C. ZUCCARELLO4 1National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Private Bag 14-901, Wellington 6241, New Zealand 2Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China 3Herbarium and Biology Department, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, Coker Hall, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA 4School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand (Received 22 April 2015; revised 10 July 2015; accepted 19 July 2015) Blade-forming red algae occur worldwide and, prior to DNA sequencing, had been notoriously difficult to identify and classify, especially when lacking critical reproductive features. This, coupled in New Zealand with many longstanding assumptions that taxa were identical to non-New Zealand species or genera, resulted in many misapplied names. Pugetia delicatissima R.E. Norris, an endemic New Zealand blade-forming species of the family Kallymeniaceae, is actually comprised of one existing and one new species belonging to two distinct genera, as established by our phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences from the rbcL gene. Analyses of combined rbcL and LSU genes showed that neither is closely related to the generitype of Pugetia, the northern- eastern Pacific, P.fragilissima Kylin. We propose the names Judithia and Wendya for these two newly revealed genera. In addition to diagnostic rbcL and LSU sequences, Judithia is morphologically and anatomically characterized by rounded to oblong blades that do not taper basally at the stipe, loosely aggregated surface cortical cells and cystocarps lacking both a pericarp and an ostiole, all features observed in the holotype of P.delicatissima. Wendya, in contrast, is characterized by blades that taper both apically and basally, compactly arranged surface cortical cells and cystocarps that have both a pericarp and a distinct ostiole. The two genera also are distinguished from one other, as well as from Pugetia by features of pre- and post-fertilization development, including the number of subsidiary cells produced on carpogonial and auxiliary branch systems, whether subsidiary cells in the carpogonial branch system fuse with the supporting cell or not, and the site of origin of gonimoblast cells. Although small in area, New Zealand hosts ten of the 27 currently recognized genera in the Kallymeniaceae and is the southern-hemisphere region of greatest generic diversification in this family. Downloaded by [Niwa] at 19:05 02 December 2015 Key words: DNA sequencing, endemic genera, large-subunit ribosomal RNA (LSU), molecular phylogeny, post-fertilization development, rbcL, systematics INTRODUCTION The family Kallymeniaceae of the order New Zealand hosts a very diverse marine macroalgal Gigartinales, contains 27 genera (Guiry & Guiry, flora (Nelson, 2012), one that contains many species 2015) and is especially diverse in temperate regions of foliose red algae. Recent detailed studies of these of both hemispheres. Several new genera recently red algal blades have uncovered unexpected diversity have been described from Antarctica, New Zealand, Chile and Canada (Hommersand et al., 2009; that has led to descriptions of new genera and species ’ that previously were misidentified or assigned long- D Archino et al., 2010, 2012; Clarkston & Saunders, standing names based on taxa from extra-New 2012). Currently, nine genera and 18 species of Zealand floras (Kraft 1976; Hommersand et al., Kallymeniaceae are reported from New Zealand 2010;D’Archino et al., 2010, 2012, 2014; Nelson (Dalen & Nelson, 2013), marking it as a region with et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2012b). one of the most diverse concentrations of this family in the world and made even more so by the number of poorly defined and undescribed members still await- ing valid names. Adams et al.(1974) noted the pre- Correspondence to: Roberta D’Archino. sence of one or more undescribed species of E-mail: [email protected]; Showe-Mei Lin. E-mail: Kallymenia J. Agardh, and D’Archino et al.(2011) [email protected] ISSN 0967-0262 (print)/ISSN 1469-4433 (online)/15/000001-16 © 2015 British Phycological Society http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2015.1104557 R. D’Archino et al. 2 included five undescribed New Zealand Photos of vouchers were taken with a digital camera Canon Kallymeniaceae on the basis of DNA-sequence ana- G12 (Japan). Herbarium specimens referred to P.delicatissima lysis, formally designating one as Ectophora margin- and unidentified specimens of bladed red algae in WELT and ata D’Archino & W.A. Nelson but leaving the AK were also examined anatomically. remaining four undescribed for lack of adequate mate- rial. In this paper we focus on specimens conforming to Pugetia delicatissima (Norris 1957), a species that DNA sequencing and analyses was not in the same clade as the generitype, P. fragi- DNA was extracted with a modified CTAB protocol lissima, from the Salish Sea of Washington, USA (Zuccarello & Lokhorst, 2005), with the Hughey protocol (D’Archino et al. 2011; Lin et al. 2012a). (Hughey et al. 2001) or using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit Pugetia delicatissima was described based on (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA) following the manufac- material collected from drift in 1933 by Robert turer’s instructions. The plastid-encoded large subunit of the Laing at Gore Bay on the east coast of the South ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase gene (rbcL), fi Island (Norris, 1957). The two main features suggest- was ampli ed using the primer combination F57-R753 and ing to Norris (1957, p. 275) that this species should be F753-RrbcS (Freshwater & Rueness, 1994). PCR conditions consisted of an initial denaturation of 4 min at 94°C, followed included in Pugetia Kylin were the medulla, mainly by 37 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 45°C and 1 min at 72° composed of large, rounded cells rather than mostly of fi fi C, with a nal 5 min extension at 72°C. The nuclear-encoded laments, and the presence of monocarpogonial sup- nuclear large subunit of ribosomal RNA (LSU) was amplified porting cells. Apart from its type locality, P. delicatis- using primers from Harper & Saunders (2001) following sima had also been reported from the North Island side Zuccarello & West (2002). PCR products were cleaned of Cook Strait, several sites on the South Island, using ExoSAP-IT reagent (USB, Cleveland, Ohio, USA) Stewart I., Chatham Is., and the subantarctic and commercially sequenced (Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Antipodes and Auckland Islands (Adams, 1994). Korea). Sequences were edited, assembled and aligned Specimens in WELT and AK (Thiers, 2015) that using the Geneious software package (Biomatters, available conformed to P. delicatissima display great morpho- from http://www.geneious.com/). Alignments for rbcL were logical variation. Whether this reflected one highly straightforward, no gaps were found in the dataset. The LSU polymorphic species or several cryptic species, each data was aligned using MAFFT alignment software (Katoh et al., 2002) in the Geneious program and modified by eye. less morphologically diverse, had long vexed taxono- jMODELTEST 2.1.1 (Guindon & Gascuel, 2003;Darriba mists. Herein, herbarium and newly collected speci- fi fi et al., 2012) was used to nd the model of sequence evolution mens identi ed as P. delicatissima, from numerous that best fit the dataset under Akaike Information Criterion locations and displaying a broad range of morpholo- (AIC). Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed gies, were re-examined in light of DNA sequence with RAxML 7.2.8 (Stamatakis, 2006) with all three codon data. We found that what superficially appeared to be positions partitioned and the GTR+gamma model and 500 a single variable species comprises two non-sister non-parametric bootstrap replicates (Felsenstein, 1985). For lineages that we describe below as two new genera. the combined LSU and rbcL dataset four partitions were used also using the GTR model. Bayesian inference was performed with MrBayes v3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003). All Downloaded by [Niwa] at 19:05 02 December 2015 codons and genes were partitioned separately. Analyses con- MATERIALS AND METHODS sisted of two independent simultaneous runs of one cold and Collections were made mainly by scuba diving to 20 m depths three incrementally heated chains, and 3 × 106 generations on the Otago Peninsula, South Island (December 2008, with sampling every 1000 generations. Log files of the runs January 2010), Stewart Island (March 2009, November were checked with Tracer v1.4.1 (Rambaut & Drummond, 2011) and on the North Island at Castle Point (November 2007) and a burn-in sample of 300 trees was removed before 2010, August 2014), and Wellington (October 2014). calculating the majority-rule consensus tree.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us