Bibliography

Bibliography

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Reminders of duty: A Kantian theory of blame Scholten, M. Publication date 2016 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Scholten, M. (2016). Reminders of duty: A Kantian theory of blame. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 Bibliography Allison, Henry. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 2004. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven: Yale University Press. American Psychiatric Organization. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Organization. ———. 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Organization. Arneson, Richard. 2007. “The Smart Theory of Moral Responsibility and Desert.” In Desert and Justice, edited by Serena Olsaretti. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Arpaly, Nomy. 2003. Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Audi, Robert. 2006. Practical Reasoning and Ethical Decision. London: Routledge. Austin, J. L. 1956. “A Plea for Excuses.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 1-30. Baron, Marcia W. 2006. “Excuses, Excuses.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1): 21-39. ———. 2005. “Justifications and Excuses.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2: 387-413. ———. 1995. Kantian Ethics: Almost without Apology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Barry, Peter Brian. 2011. “Saving Strawson: Evil and Strawsonian Accounts of Moral Responsibility.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1): 5-21. Beauchamp, Tom L. and James F. Childress. 2008. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Beck, Lewis White. 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Benson, Paul. 1987. “Moral Worth.” Philosophical Studies 51 (3): 365-382. Berrios, G. E. 1987. “Dementia during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Conceptual History.” Psychological Medicine 17 (04): 829-837. Blöser, Claudia. 2015. “Degrees of Responsibility in Kant’s Practical Philosophy.” Kantian Review 20 (2): 183-209. ———. 2014. Zurechnung Bei Kant. Berlin: De Gruyter. Bojanowski, Jochen. 2006. Kants Theorie der Freiheit. Berlin: De Gruyter. Brown, James. 1977. “Moral Theory and the Ought--can Principle.” Mind 86 (342): 206-223. Buchdahl, Gerd. 1969. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Blackwell. Byrd, B. Sharon and Joachim Hruschka. 2010. Kant’s Doctrine of Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Byrd, B. Sharon. 1989. “Kant’s Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution.” Law and Philosophy 8 (2): 151-200. Byrne, Sarah, Max Birchwood, Peter E. Trower, and Alan Meaden. 2006. A Casebook of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Command Hallucinations: A Social Rank Theory Approach. New York: Routledge. Capes, Justin A. 2012. “Blameworthiness without Wrongdoing.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3): 417-437. Carlson, Erik. 2000. “Incompatibilism and the Transfer of Power Necessity.” Nous 34 (2): 277-290. Chadwick, Ruth F. 1994. “Kant, Thought Insertion, and Mental Unity.” Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 1 (2): 105-113. Chisholm, Roderick. 2003. “Human Freedom and the Self.” In Free Will, edited by Gary Watson, 26-37. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Clarke, Randolph. 2003. “Toward a Credible Agent-Causal Account of Free Will.” In Free Will, edited by Gary Watson, 285-298. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Coates, D. Justin and Neil A. Tognazzini. 2013. “The Contours of Blame.” In Blame: Its Nature and Norms, 3-26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Coates, D. Justin and Philip Swenson. 2013. “Reasons-Responsiveness and Degrees of Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 165 (2): 629-645. 323 Cohen, Alix. 2009. Kant and the Human Sciences: Biology, Anthropology and History. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. ———. 2014. Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Copp, David. 1997. “Defending the Principle of Alternate Possibilities: Blameworthiness and Moral Responsibility.” Nous 31 (4): 441-456. ———. 2008. “‘Ought’ Implies ‘can’ and the Derivation of the Principle of Alternate Possibilities.” Analysis 68 (297): 67-75. ———. 2003. “‘Ought’ Implies ‘can’, Blameworthiness, and the Principle of Alternate Possibilities.” In Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities, edited by David Widerker and Michael McKenna, 265-298. Aldershot: Ashgate. Darwall, Stephen. 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect and Accountability. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ———. 2006. “The Value of Autonomy and Autonomy of the Will.” Ethics 116: 163-284. Dennett, Daniel C. 1984. Elbow Room. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Driscoll, Richard, Chithiramohan Ramalingam, and Bee Brockman. 1991. “Capgras Syndrome, Mania and Delusionally Motivated Assaults.” The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 2 (1): 49-57. Duff, R. A. 2006. “Excuses, Moral and Legal: A Comment on Marcia Baron’s ‘Excuses, Excuses’.” Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1): 49-55. Elliott, Carl. 1996. The Rules of Insanity: Moral Responsibility and the Mentally Ill Offender. Albany: SUNY Press. Enoch, David. 2006. “Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from what is Constitutive of Action.” The Philosophical Review 115 (2): 169-198. Ertl, Wolfgang. 2012. ““Ludewig” Molina and Kant’s Libertarian Compatibilism.” In A Companion to Luis De Molina, edited by M. Kaufmann and A. Aichele, 405-445. Boston: Brill. Feinberg, Joel. 1970. “What is so Special about Mental Illness?” In Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility, 272-292. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Finch, Alicia and Ted A. Warfield. 1998. “The Mind Argument and Libertarianism.” Mind 107 (427): 515-528. Fischer, John Martin and Mark Ravizza. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 324 Fischer, John Martin. 2004. “Free Will and Moral Responsibility.” In Handbook on Ethical Theory, edited by David Copp. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ———. 2003. “‘Ought-Implies-can’, Causal Determinism and Moral Responsibility.” Analysis 63 (3): 244-250. Fletcher, George P. 1987. “Law and Morality: A Kantian Perspective.” Columbia Law Review 87 (3): 533-558. Foot, Philippa. 2002. “Are Moral Considerations Overriding?” In Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy, 181-188. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Foucault, Michel. 2006. History of Madness. Translated by J. Murphy and J. Khalfa. London: Routledge. Frankfurt, Harry G. 1988a. “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.” In The Importance of What We Care About, 1-11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1988b. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” In The Importance of What We Care About, 11-25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1988c. “The Importance of What We Care About.” In The Importance of What We Care About, 80-94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1988d. “Rationality and the Unthinkable.” In The Importance of What We Care About, 177-190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1988e. “What Are We Morally Responsible For?” In The Importance of What We Care About, 95-103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Friedman, Michael. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Frierson, Patrick R. 2003. Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 2009a. “Kant on Mental Disorder. Part 1: An Overview.” History of Psychiatry 20 (3): 267-289. ———. 2009b. “Kant on Mental Disorder. Part 2: Philosophical Implications of Kant’s Account.” History of Psychiatry 20 (3): 290-310. ———. 2014. Kant’s Empirical Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Frith, Christopher and Eve Johnstone. 2003. Schizophrenia: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fugate, Courtney D. 2015. “On a Supposed Solution to the Reinhold/Sidgwick Problem in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals.” European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3): 249-373. 325 Graham, Peter A. 2011. “Fischer on Blameworthiness and “Ought” Implies “Can”.” Social Theory and Practice 37 (1): 63-80. ———. 2011. “‘Ought’ and Ability.” Philosophical Review 120 (3): 337-382. ———. 2014. “A Sketch of a Theory of Moral Blameworthiness.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2): 388-409. Gressis, Rob. 2010. “Recent Work on Kantian Maxims I: Established Approaches.” Philosophy Compass 5 (3):

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us