pg. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM MATTER PAGE Mayor’s foreword Introduction Status of the IDP Legislation/Policy Statement Focus Area Process Followed Analysis of Status Situational Analysis Population Break down Economic Profile Poverty and Income State of Service delivery Delivery on percentages Primary Health Care Organisational Structure History of payment level Revenue Break down Consumer debt Housing Plan Public Safety and Emergency Local Economic Development Tourism Strategy People living with disability pg. 4 MAYOR’S FOREWORD pg. 5 INTRODUCTION The law requires the municipal council, reasonably after its election into office, to craft and adopt at least a five year development plan for its area of governance. The plan must be integrated and developmental and should seek to address the current service delivery needs and also to look forward into the future for developments. The municipality should seek to bring all stakeholders on board with regards to its plans, every stakeholder will in turn be expected to do services and businesses within the framework of the dully adopted Integrated Development Plan. Integrated Development Planning should be through a process in which the Municipality prepares a tool for the advancement of its strategic objectives. This intentional and intensive exercise is on the basis of Municipal Systems Act, of which, inter- alia, its intentions are to provide mechanisms by which local government will function efficiently and as an organic whole. It is against this back ground that the Reviewed Fourth Generation IDP 2020-2022 must be appreciated, it is further in keeping with the following objects of local government, The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act No. 108 of 1996, and sec 152(1) states the objects of local government, viz (a) To provide democratic and accountable government for local community (b) To ensure the provision of services to the communities in a sustainable (c) To promote social and economic development (d) To promote a safe and healthy environment and (e) To encourage the involvement of community organizations in the matters of local government. 2. STATUS OF INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN [IDP] The Municipal Systems Act, No 32 of 2000 as amended, defines the status of the municipal IDP as follows, . IDP is the principal strategic planning instrument, which guides and informs all planning and development, and all decisions with regard to planning, management and development in the municipality . It binds the municipality in the exercise of its executive authority, except to the extent of any inconsistency between a municipality’s integrated development plan and national or provincial legislation, in which case such legislation prevails . It binds all the other persons to the extent that those parts of the integrated development plan that impose duties or affect the rights of those persons have been passed as by- laws, and . It should be a product of intergovernmental and inter-spherical planning pg. 6 SECTION A: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Reviewed Fourth Generation IDP 2020-2022 was developed after consultation with the community for the purpose of crafting as per the prescripts of Chapter 5 of the Municipal Systems Act. This Reviewed Fourth Generation IDP is deliberately structured in a strategic and prudent manner so as to take us through to at least 2022. This development takes cue from the previous Reviewed Fourth Generation IDP 2019-2020, which was not successfully implemented due to limited resources in many respects. The Reviewed Fourth Generation IDP was founded on the historical achievements over a period of years, e,g Eradication of bucket system and completion of water-borne system. Building of more houses Primary Health Care enhanced Facilities for Sports and Recreation put in place, even though there have been large scale vandalism of the facilities. Proper billing system and Good governance enhanced. These are the few for mentioning, and they are mentioned bearing in mind that we still have variety of challenges lying ahead of us, some look very insurmountable. However, we draw strength from this strategically designed instrument, to keep service delivery going. Amongst our major challenges, we have socio-economic development as an area that cannot be postponed, it must be noted that we have adopted a Reviewed Local Economic Development strategy, which aims to create an environment for all people to access economic opportunities presented by our developmental programs. Economic growth would be central in the development of the town, more so that we need to enlarge our revenue base. We must ensure that our strategy takes into account the need to enhance the growth of the second economy, whilst at the same time helping with the sustenance of the first economy. We are also faced with issues like, urbanization, swelling of grave yards due to deaths related to HIV/AIDS amongst other things, all these are anticipated in our Reviewed Spatial Development Framework and therefore we will be able to fairly, yet robustly tackle all challenges on that front. There are plans with practical and achievable targets, see section on Schematic Representation of Projects / Plans, which are aimed at developing and maintaining our infrastructure, it is on these basis that we are confident that we will succeed in our efforts to improve our water supply, thereby realizing the continuation of an effective sanitation system and electrification program. pg. 7 POPULATION BY GENDER AND AGE Population '000 2015-2016 2017-2018 2019-2020 Age Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Age: 0 – 4 3092 3062 6154 3192 3425 6617 4949 4794 9743 Age: 5 – 9 3840 3829 7669 3579 3388 6967 4407 4297 8704 Age: 10 – 19 7619 7766 15385 8106 8358 16464 7114 7005 14119 Age: 20 – 29 5210 5734 10944 6258 6586 12844 12844 7146 19990 Age: 30 – 39 3642 3947 7589 4754 4851 9605 5180 5091 10271 Age: 40 – 49 2636 2638 5274 3504 3570 7074 4005 4175 8180 Age: 50 – 59 1736 1819 3555 2240 2208 4448 3155 3138 6293 Age: 60 – 69 1096 1240 2336 1297 1546 2843 1716 1915 3631 Age: 70+ 749 906 1655 887 1286 2173 1009 1503 2512 Source: Statistics SA HOUSE HOLD Number of households in municipal area Number of poor households in Households ('000) Households municipal area Year -2 Year -1 Year 0 pg. 8 Socio Economic Status 60% 50% 40% 30% Year -2 Year -1 Year 0 20% 10% 0% Housing Backlog as Unemployment Rate Proportion of Households Proportion of Population in HIV/AIDS Prevalence Illiterate people older than 14 proportion of current demand with no Income Low-skilled Employment years HOUSEHOLDS WITH MINIMUM BASIC SERVICES Year -3 Year -2 Year 1 Year 0 Electricity service connections 80% 90% 92% 92% Water - available within 200 m from dwelling 65% 75% 80% 80% Sanitation - Households with at leats VIP service 58% 63% 63% 62% Waste collection - kerbside collection once a week 35% 40% 45% 43% pg. 9 Proportion of households with access to basic services 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Year -3 Year -2 Year -1 Year 0 Electricity service connections Water - available within 200 m from dwelling Sanitation - Households with at leats VIP service Waste collection - kerbside collection once a week pg. 10 OPERATING RATIOS : 2019-2020 Detail % Employee Cost 20.95 Repairs & Maintenance 3.97 Finance Charges & Impairment 20.48 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE: YEAR -2 TO YEAR 0 R'000 Detail 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 Original Budget 48 420 000 68 035 000 30 228 0000 Adjustment Budget 66 961 000 68 035 000 35 344 000 Actual 41 150 000 46 680 000 - WATER SERVICES DELIVERY LEVELS: HOUSEHOLDS Year -3 Year -2 Year -1 Year 0 Description Actual Actual Actual Actual No. No. No. No. Water: (above min level) Piped water inside dwelling 2,626 2,635 2,649 2,655 Piped water inside yard (but not in dwelling) 13,278 14,337 14,323 13,969 Using public tap (within 200m from dwelling ) – – – 580 Other water supply (within 200m) Minimum Service Level and Above sub- total 15,904 16,972 16,972 17,204 Minimum Service Level and Above Percentage 100% 100% 100% 100% Water: (below min level) Using public tap (more than 200m from dwelling) – – – – Other water supply (more than 200m from dwelling – – – – No water supply Below Minimum Service Level sub- total – – – – Below Minimum Service Level Percentage 0% 0% 0% 0% Total number of households* 15,904 16,972 16,972 17,204 * - To include informal settlements T 3.1.3 pg. 11 HOUSEHOLDS - WATER SERVICE DELIVERY LEVELS BELOW THE MINIMUM Year -3 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 Original Adjusted Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Formal Settlements Total households 0 0 0 0 0 0 Households below minimum service level 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proportion of households below minimum service level 0 0 0 0 0 0 Informal Settlements Total households 0 0 0 0 0 0 Households below minimum service level 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proportion of households below minimum service level 0 0 0 0 0 0 ACCESS TO WATER Households with access Households with access Households receiving 6 kl free# to water points* to piped water 2016-2017 100% 100% 100% 2017-2018 100% 100% 100% 2018-2019 100% 100% 100% pg. 12 Sanitation/Sewerage: (above minimum level) - Year 1 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 – SANITATION SERVICE DELIVERY LEVELS Year -3 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 Description Outcome Outcome Outcome Actual No. No. No. No. Sanitation/sewerage: (above minimum level) Flush toilet (connected to sewerage) 15704 16772 16772 16424 Flush toilet (with septic tank) 200 200 200 200 Chemical toilet 0 0 0 0 Pit toilet (ventilated) 0 0 0 0 Other toilet provisions (above min.service level) 0 0 0 0 Minimum Service Level and Above sub-total 15904 16972 16972 16624 Minimum Service Level and Above Percentage 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.63% Sanitation/sewerage: (below minimum level) Bucket toilet 0 0 0 0 Other toilet provisions (below min.service level) 0 0 0 0 No toilet provisions 0 0 0 580 Below Minimum Service Level sub-total 0 0 0 580 Below Minimum Service Level Percentage 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% Total households 15904 16972 16972 17204 pg.