Dendara Pierre Zignani To cite this version: Pierre Zignani. Dendara. FRENCH ARCHAEOLOGY IN EGYPT (L. Coulon et M. Cressent ed), 2020. hal-03123261 HAL Id: hal-03123261 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03123261 Submitted on 12 Feb 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. EDITED BY LAURENT COULON AND MÉLANIE CRESSENT FRENCH ARCHAEOLOGY IN EGYPT RESEARCH, COOPERATION, INNOVATION INSTITUT FRANÇAIS D’ARCHÉOLOGIE ORIENTALE BIBLIOTHÈQUE GÉNÉRALE 62 – 2020 VI FRENCHARCHAEOLOGYINEGYPT MEDITERRANEAN SEA N uto Alexandria p. CEe Plintine p. p. Delta Tanis Taposiris Magna p. Tell elerr p. Tell elSamara p. p. Tell elsid p. om bu ellu p. Abu Rawas p. Sinai Saqqara Cairo afSTabbet elues fao p. p. p. Fayum Piladelpia yn Souna p. p. urob Tebtynis p. p. Wadi Sannur adi Araba p. W P. 170-173 adi elarf p. Bahariya oasis anub asr elgu p. Middle Egypt FrenchBait archaeologyin p. Hatnub p. RED SEA EgyptUpper Egypt Eastern Desert Dendara p. Coptos TT /sasif p. p. p. Qus Dakhla oasis Ramesseum p. Kharga oasis p. Medamud alat Deir elMedina Luxor p. p. p. Karna CFEETOsirian Sanctuaries rmant p. 2-25 p. p. Abbad Western Desert p. Samut ort Bi’r Samut p. p. Dus p. om mbo p. Wadi Abu Subeira p. Aswan 0 km © Ifao/O. Onézime/Adapted by B. Boileau Summary Maps v Foreword ix Preface xi Chronological table xii THE MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS IN FRENCH ARCHAEOLOGY IN EGYPT 1 The Institutional Framework and Franco-Egyptian Cooperation in Archaeology 2 The French Institute for Oriental Archaeology (IFAO) 10 The Centre for Alexandrian Studies (CEAlex) 18 The Franco-Egyptian Centre for the Study of the Temples of Karnak (CFEETK) 22 The French Archaeological Mission of Thebes-West (MAFTO) and the Ramesseum 26 The Louvre Museum 30 The French Research Institute for Development (IRD) 34 The French National Institute for Preventive Archaeological Research (INRAP) 36 Sponsorship 38 OVERVIEW OF FRENCH ARCHAEOLOGICAL MISSIONS IN EGYPT 43 CAIRO AND ITS SURROUNDINGS 45 Abu Rawash, Early Dynastic Cemetery M 46 Saqqara (MafS) 49 Tabbet el-Guesh 53 THE DELTA AND THE NORTHERN MARGINS 57 Buto (Tell el-Fara‘in) 58 Kom Abu Bellu 62 Tanis (Tell San el-Hagar) 66 Tell el-Iswid 70 Tell el-Samara 74 Tell el-Herr 78 Taposiris Magna and Plinthine (Abusir and Kom el-Nogus) 82 THE FAYUM 87 Gurob 88 Philadelphia (Kom el-Kharaba el-Kabir Girza) 92 Tebtynis (Umm-el-Breigât) 96 MIDDLE EGYPT 101 Hatnub 102 Bawit 106 VIII French archaeology in Egypt UPPER EGYPT 111 Dendara 112 Coptos (Qift/Quft) 116 Qus 120 Kom Ombo 124 THE THEBAN REGION 131 Medamud 132 Karnak, Osirian Sanctuaries 136 Armant 140 Deir el-Medina 144 Tomb of Padiamenope (TT 33) 148 Asasif 152 THE WESTERN DESERT 157 The Western Oases: Introduction 158 Dush (Kharga Oasis) 160 Balat (Dakhla Oasis) 162 Ganub Qasr el-Aguz (Bahariya Oasis) 164 THE EASTERN DESERT AND THE RED SEA COAST 169 Wadi Araba 170 Wadi Sannur 174 The Eastern Desert: Samut North, Bi’r Samut and Abbad 178 Wadi Abu Subeira 182 Ayn Soukhna 186 Wadi el-Jarf 190 APPENDIXES 195 Site Directors, collaborators, partner institutions and sponsors 197 Bibliography 209 Dendara Dendara is particularly associated with its main temple whose walls and ceilings present an extraordinary religious knowledge dating to the twilight of pharaonic Egypt. A recent study of the construction process of this monument has shown it to be the culmination of erudite architecture, being an intellectual and abstract game aiming to achieve an overarching work relating to the sacred. Beyond the magnificence of the temple of Hathor itself, there exists a well-preserved area consisting of a regional settlement (about 200 ha) dating from the origins of pharaonic civilization to medieval times. Conscious of the exceptional potential for study regarding the environment, the development and the modifications at this sacred location, the French Institute for Oriental Archaeology (IFAO) developed a multi-disciplinary and diachronic approach concerning the site’s archaeology. It has conducted work on the temples, the sound landscape, civil buildings, geo-archaeology, the animal necropolis and the huge cemetery which includes burials from all periods. Dendara 113 Dendara is incomparable with regard to the monumental heritage pro- vided by the last great Egyptian temples. The principal temple was begun in July 54 BC during the reign of Ptolemy XII (80-58 BC and 55-51 BC). Its programme was never totally accomplished, following the example of the temple of Horus at Edfu, since it lacks architectural elements which precede the most sacred areas of a great temple of that period, namely a pylon and a court. These features occur at the site at foundational level, with the exception of the rear part of the peribolos wall which had been dismantled during another period. The other components, the naos (at the heart of which the divinity resided) and the pronaos, are almost intact. They comprise a layout of more than fifty rooms over several levels. This temple, whose walls and ceilings abound with texts and images, was dedicated to the goddess Hathor, patron of the city. A feminine deity with cosmic origin, she can also be represented in the form of a lioness, a female falcon and a cow. In the temples her attributes vary, though she ViewfromthewestoftheHathortemple. frequently bears lyre-shaped horns enclosing a solar disk. The modern .1 P.Zignani. visitor is greeted, at the pronaos level, by her most iconic representation© in monumental architecture: the sistrum column with a capital which ’TempleofHathor,ambulatoryaround bears the image of the radiant face of a young woman adorned with cows .2 thecella,theimpactoflightatthesummer ears which protrude over her wig. This is mounted on an architectural .solstice.©P.Zignani façade in the form of a sistrum, an attribute associated with the goddess. The last testimony of national importance to be constructed, the architecture of the temple of Hathor has benefited from the evolution over many millennia of an understanding relating to the resistance of, as well as mastery of, construction materials, in addition to the excel- lence of the management of spatial design and geometry. Such a structure was at the heart of a regional metropolis, the name of whose divinity, Hathor, was appended to the toponym Heliopolis. Dendara was thus called “Heliopolis of the Goddess”, to distinguish it from Heliopolis of the North (modern-day Ain Shams on the periphery of Cairo) and the Heliopolis of the South (the city of Armant, south of Luxor). IFAO’s focus at the site of Dendara comprises one of its major under- takings: the publication of the Graeco-Roman temple inscriptions. Under the direction of Émile Chassinat, a complete hieroglyphic font was created to print and publish the texts which cover the walls of these remarkably well-preserved temples. Between 1892 and 1934, É. Chassinat published 14 volumes regarding the temple of Edfu, then began the publication series relating to the texts in the temple of Dendara. His work was carried on by François Daumas, and then by Sylvie Cauville. Serge Sauneron, director of the IFAO from 1969 to 1976, similarly published the temple of Esna. The study of texts and decoration could not, however, be sufficient for understanding the complexity of these religious buildings, in addition to the evolution of the environment in which they were constructed, then being modified throughout the Pharaonic period. Archaeological excavations were, until very recently, limited to the necropolis, carrying on those earlier excavations which had been con- ducted by William M. Flinders Petrie in 1898, then, from 1915 to 1918, by Clarence Stanley Fisher. Clearance of the temple by the sebakhin led to fortuitous discoveries, but which lacked stratigraphic context. Among these are the monolithic limestone walls of a chapel of Montuhotep II, uPPEREgypt 114 reused by Merenptah, which is exhibited in the great central hall of the 3. Ongoingarchaeologicalresearchin .Egyptian Museum of Cairo in Tahrir. thewesternpartoftheHathortemenos AreaAisassociatedwiththefoundations Some archaeological remains show that the city was already a regional ofthechapelofMontuhotepII capital under Khufu in the 4th century (c. 2757-2450 BC). At the heart (11thDynasty,c.2055–2004BC);AreaBis of a region known for its predynastic sites between Naqada and Abydos, aLatePeriodplatformwithThutmoseIII .settlement has existed from the start of the Pharaonic era. Sondages to blocks.©P.Zignani the south and west of the main temple revealed occupation dating to the Naqada II period (3400-3200 BC). Human visitation to the locality is also attested for much more ancient times since the most ancient human skeleton in the Nile Valley, belonging to the Middle Palaeolithic period (more than 50 000 years ago) was discovered at Taramsa Hill, 2 km from the main sanctuary. Dendara as a significant region continued well beyond the time of pharaonic gods up to the Medieval period. Thus, the visitor can observe important remains of a church with the plan of a basilica which, from first analysis, may date to the 6th century AD.