Bibliography

Bibliography

BIBLIOGRAPHY Adler, Matthew D. 2006a. Constitutional Fidelity, the Rule of Recognition, and the Communitar- ian Turn in Contemporary Positivism. Fordham Law Review 75: 1671–95. ———. 2006b. Popular Constitutionalism and the Rule of Recognition. Northwestern University Law Review 100: 719–805. Alexander, Larry. 1990. Law and Exclusionary Reasons. Philosophical Topics 18: 5–22. ———. 1991. The Gap. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 14: 695–702. ———. 1999a. Can Law Survive the Asymmetry of Authority? In Rules and Reasoning: Essays in Honor of Fred Schauer. Ed. Linda Meyer, 39–54. Oxford: Hart. ———. 1999b. “With Me, It’s All er Nuthin’”: Formalism in Law and Morality. University of Chi- cago Law Review 66: 530–64. Alexander, Larry and Emily Sherwin. 2001. The Rule of Rules. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Alexander, Larry and Frederick Schauer. 2007. Law’s Limited Domain Confronts Morality’s Uni- versal Empire. William and Mary Law Review 48: 1580–604. Alexander, Larry and Kenneth Kress. 1995. Against Legal Principles. In Law and Interpretation. Ed. Andrei Marmor, 279–327. Oxford: Clarendon. Alexy, Robert. 1989. On Necessary Relations between Law and Morality. Ratio Juris 2: 167–83. ———. 1999. A Defence of Radbruch’s Formula. In Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order. Ed. David Dyzenhaus, 15–39. Portland: Hart. Allan, T.R.S. 2001. Constitutional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Allen, C.K. 1931. Legal Duties. Oxford: Clarendon. ———. 1964. Law in the Making. 7th ed. Oxford: Clarendon. (1st ed. 1927.) Almendares, Nicholas and Landa, Dimitri. 2007. Strategic Coordination and the Law. Law and Philosophy 26: 501–29. Alschuler, Albert W. 2000. Law Without Values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Altman, Andrew. 1986. Legal Realism, Critical Legal Studies, and Dworkin. Philosophy and Pub- lic Affairs 15: 205–35. ———. 1990. Critical Legal Studies: A Liberal Critique. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ———. 2001. Arguing About Law. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Anscombe, G.E.M. 1958. On Brute Facts. Analysis 18: 69–72. Aristotle. The Politics. Trans. T.A. Sinclair. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1962. Attwool, Elspeth. 1997. From Philosophy to Practice: A Sketch of William Galbraith Miller. In Law, Values and Social Practices. Ed. John Tasioulas, 213–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Austin, J.L. 1956–1957. A Plea for Excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57 (N.S.): 1–30. ———. 1962. How To Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Austin, John. 1873. Lectures on Jurisprudence, or, The Philosophy of Positive Law. 4th ed. Ed. Robert Campbell. London: Murray. (1st ed. 1863.) ———. 1954. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Ed. H.L.A. Hart. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Ayers, Ian. 1990. Playing Games with the Law. Stanford University Press 42: 1291–317. Baird, Douglas G., Robert H. Gertner, and Randal C. Picker. 1994. Game Theory and the Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Baker, G.P. 1977. Defeasibility and Meaning. In Law, Morality, and Society. Ed. P.M.S. Hacker and J. Raz, 26–57. Oxford: Clarendon. Bartlett, Katherine T. 1991. Feminist Legal Methods. In Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender. Ed. Katherine T. Bartlett and Rosanne Kennedy, 370–403. Boulder: Westview. G.J. Postema, A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-8960-1, © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 586 TREATISE, 11 - 20TH CENTURY: THE COMMON LAW WORLD ———. 2000. Cracking Foundations as Feminist Method. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and Law 8: 31–54. Bauman, Richard W. 1996. Critical Legal Studies: A Guide to the Literature. Boulder: Westview. Benditt, Theodore. 1978. Law as Rule and Principle. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ———. 2004. Acting in Concert or Going it Along: Game Theory and the Law. Law and Philoso- phy 23: 615–30. Bentham, Jeremy. 1970. Of Laws in General. Ed. H.L.A. Hart. London: Athlone. ———. 1977. A Comment on the Commentaries and A Fragment on Government. Ed. J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart. London: Athlone. ———. 1983. Constitutional Code, vol. I. E.F. Rosen and J.H. Burns. Oxford: Clarendon. ———. 1989. First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code. Ed. Philip Schofield. Oxford: Clarendon. ———. 1993. Official Aptitude Maximized; Expense Minimized. Ed. Philip Schofield. Oxford: Clarendon. ———. 1996. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Ed. J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart. With a new introduction by F. Rosen, and an interpretive essay by H.L.A. Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ———. 1997. De l’ontologie et autre texts sur les fictions, English text ed. Philip Schofield, French trans. and comm. Jean-Pierre Cléro and Christian Laval. Paris: Editions du Seuil. ———. 1998. “Legislator of the World”: Writings on Codification, Law, and Education. Ed. Philip Schofield and Jonathan Harris. Oxford: Clarendon. Bickel, Alexander M. and Henry H. Wellington. 1957. Legislative Purpose and Judicial Process: The Lincoln Mills Case. Harvard Law Review 71: 1–39. Bierling, Ernst. 1883. Zur Kritik der Juristischen Grundbegriffe, vol 2. Gotha: Partha. Bix, Brian. 1999. H.L.A. Hart and the Hermeneutic Turn in Legal Theory. SMU Law Review 52: 167–199. ———. 2002. Natural Law: The Modern Tradition. In The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Ed. Jules Coleman and Scott Shapiro, 61–103. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press. Blackstone, William. 1979. Commentaries on the Laws of England, 4 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (1st ed. 1765–1769.) Bowring, John, ed. 1838–1843. Works of Jeremy Bentham, 11 vols. Edinburgh: W. Tait. Boyle, James. 1992. Critical Legal Studies. New York: New York University Press. Bratman, Michael E. 1999. Faces of Intention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 2006. Dynamics of Sociality. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30: 1–15. Brennan, William J. Jr. 1986. The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification. South Texas Law Review 27: 433–45. Broome, John. 2000. Normative Requirements. Normativity. Ed. Jonathan Dancy, 78–99. Oxford: Blackwell. Brown, Jethro. 1906. The Austinian Theory of Law. London: Murray. Brudney, Daniel. 1993. Two Links Between Law and Morality. Ethics 103: 280–301. Bryce, James. 1901. Studies in History and Jurisprudence. London: Oxford University Press. Buckland, W.W. 1890. The Difficulties of Abstract Jurisprudence. Law Quarterly Review 6: 436–45. ———. 1945. Some Reflections on Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Burge, Tyler. 1975. On Knowledge and Convention. The Philosophical Review 84: 249–55. Burley, Justine. 2004. Ronald Dworkin and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell. Burton, Steven J. 1987. Ronald Dworkin and Legal Positivism. Iowa Law Review 73: 109–29. Calabresi, Guido. 1970. The Costs of Accidents. New Haven: Yale University Press. Calabresi, Guido and A. Douglas Melamed. 1972. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalien- ability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review 85: 1089–128. Campbell, A.H. 1949. International Law and the Student of Jurisprudence. Transactions of the Grotius Society 35: 113–32. BIBLIOGRAPHY 587 Campbell, Tom. 1996. The Legal Theory of Ethical Positivism. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Cardozo, Benjamin N. 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press. ———. 1947. Selected writings of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo. Ed. Margaret E. Hall. New York: Fallon. Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press. Christiano, Thomas and Stefan Sciaraffa. 2003. Legal Positivism and the Nature of Obligation. Law and Philosophy 22: 487–512. Cicero, Marcus Tullius. De Re Publica and De Legibus. Trans. Clinton Walker Keyes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000. Coase, Ronald. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–45. Cohen, Felix S. 1933. Ethical Systems and Legal Ideals: An Essay on the Foundations of Legal Criticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ———. 1935. Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach. Columbia Law Review 35: 809–49. ———. 1950. Field Theory and Judicial Logic. Yale Law Journal 59: 238–72. Cohen, Marshall, ed. 1965. Law, Morality and Purpose. Villanova Law Review 10: 640–54. ———. 1983. Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Al- lanheld. Cohen, Morris R. 1933. Law and Social Order. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. ———. 1937. A Critical Sketch of Legal Philosophy in America. In Law: A Century of Progress 1835–1935. Ed. Alison A. Reppy. Vol. 2: 266–319. New York: New York University Press. ———. 1950. Reason in Law. Glenco, IL: Free Press. Coke, Sir Edward. 2003. The Selected Writings of Sir Edward Coke, 2 vols. Ed. Steve Sheppard. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Coleman, Jules L. 1982. Negative and Positive Positivism. Journal of Legal Studies 11: 139–64. ———. 1988, Markets, Morals, and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 1996. Authority and Reason. In The Autonomy of Law. Ed. Robert P. George, 287–319. Oxford: Clarendon. ———. 1998a. Incorporation, Conventionality and the Practical Difference Theory. Legal Theory 4: 381–425. (Reprinted in Jules Coleman, Hart’s Postscript. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–147.) ———. 1998b. Second Thoughts and Other First Impressions. In Analyzing Law. Ed. Brian Bix, 257–322. Oxford: Clarendon. ———. 2000. Constraints on the Criteria of Legality. Legal Theory 6: 171–83. ———. 2001a. The Practice of Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ———. 2001b. Tort Law

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    34 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us