Convergent Regulatory Evolution and Loss of Flight in Paleognathous Birds Timothy B

Convergent Regulatory Evolution and Loss of Flight in Paleognathous Birds Timothy B

RESEARCH PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION To study the genomic correlates of flight loss in ratites, we assembled and annotated 11 new paleognath genomes (fig. S1 and tables S1 to S3) (23), including eight flightless ratites [greater Convergent regulatory evolution and rhea, lesser rhea, cassowary, emu, Okarito kiwi, great spotted kiwi, little spotted kiwi, and loss of flight in paleognathous birds the extinct little bush moa (19, 24)] and three tinamous (thicket tinamou, elegant crested Timothy B. Sackton1,2*, Phil Grayson2,3, Alison Cloutier2,3, Zhirui Hu4, Jun S. Liu4, tinamou, and Chilean tinamou), and analyzed Nicole E. Wheeler5,6, Paul P. Gardner5,7, Julia A. Clarke8, Allan J. Baker9,10, them together with the published ostrich, white- Michele Clamp1, Scott V. Edwards2,3* throated tinamou (25), and North Island brown kiwi (26) genomes, along with 30 existing neo- A core question in evolutionary biology is whether convergent phenotypic evolution gnath and outgroup genomes. is driven by convergent molecular changes in proteins or regulatory regions. We combined We compiled a total data set of 41,184,181 base phylogenomic, developmental, and epigenomic analysis of 11 new genomes of pairs of aligned DNA from 20,850 noncoding paleognathous birds, including an extinct moa, to show that convergent evolution loci, including introns, ultraconserved elements of regulatory regions, more so than protein-coding genes, is prevalent among (27), and conserved non-exonic elements (CNEEs) developmental pathways associated with independent losses of flight. A Bayesian (table S4) (23, 28) to test the hypothesis of ratite analysis of 284,001 conserved noncoding elements, 60,665 of which are corroborated paraphyly and to resolve the placement of rheas, as enhancers by open chromatin states during development, identified 2355 independent which remains an outstanding question in accelerations along lineages of flightless paleognaths, with functional consequences paleognath phylogenetics (18, 22, 29). Consistent for driving gene expression in the developing forelimb. Our results suggest that the with recent molecular phylogenies (18–22, 29), we Downloaded from genomic landscape associated with morphological convergence in ratites has a recovered a basal divergence between the ostrich substantial shared regulatory component. and the remaining paleognaths, including the tinamous, which are therefore nested within a paraphyletic ratite clade (Fig. 1A). However, con- onvergent evolution—the independent evo- of avian evolution. One of the most iconic groups trary to recent concatenation analyses (22), our lution of similar phenotypes in divergent of flightless birds is the ratites, consisting of extant coalescent analysis using MP-EST [Maximum http://science.sciencemag.org/ taxa—produces some of the most striking ostriches,kiwi,rheas,cassowaries,andemus,aswell Pseudo-likelihood for Estimating Species Trees C examples of adaptation, but the molecular as the extinct moa and elephant birds. All ratites (30)] consistently places the rheas as sister to the architecture of convergent traits is not well show morphological similarities including fore- kiwi + emu + cassowary clade (figs. S2 and S3). understood (1–4). In some cases, similar or iden- limb reduction (ranging from moderate in ostriches Our species tree is further corroborated by 4274 tical mutations in independent lineages appear and rheas to a complete absence in moa), reduced informative CR1 retroelement insertions, includ- to be associated with convergent phenotypes pectoral muscle mass associated with the absence ing 18 absent in ostriches but shared among all (5, 6); in other cases, convergent phenotypes ap- of the sternal keel, and feather modifications, as non-ostrich paleognaths, including tinamous (31). pear to arise by diverse molecular paths (7). wellasgenerallylargerbodysize(14–16). Histor- Discrepancies with previous analyses are ex- Studies of convergence are increasingly focused ically, ratites were thought to be a monophyletic plained by the existence of an empirical anomaly on detecting genome-wide patterns (8–13), but sister clade to the volant tinamous (17); however, zone (32) in paleognaths, in which incomplete the relative contributions of regulatory regions despite remaining uncertainties in paleognath lineage sorting across short internal branches on April 17, 2019 and protein-coding genes to convergent pheno- relationships, recent molecular phylogenetic evi- leading to the ancestor of rheas, kiwi, and emu + types remain undetermined. dence strongly supports ratite paraphyly, imply- cassowary results in a set of most common gene A particularly notable example of a convergent ingasmanyassixindependentlossesofflight trees that differ from the species tree (Fig. 1B and trait involves loss of powered flight, which has within this group based on phylogenetic relation- figs. S4 and S5), compromising the concatena- occurred many times independently in the course ships and biogeographic scenarios (16, 18–22). tion approach. Our analysis and biogeographic considerations (20–22)implythreetosixlosses of flight in the history of this group (Fig. 1A). The Fig. 1. Genome-wide data place rheas as alternative—asinglelossofflightatthebaseof sister to a kiwi/cassowary-emu clade. the paleognaths, followed by a regain of flight in (A) MP-EST species tree topology, with tinamous—appears implausible given evidence for 100% bootstrap support throughout (not repeated losses of flight across birds and the lack of shown). Branch lengths in units of substitutions any evidence for regains of flight after loss (fig. S6). per site were estimated with ExaML using a fully partitioned alignment of 20,850 noncoding loci constrained to the MP-EST topology. Ratite 1Informatics Group, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. paraphyly is consistent with either a single loss 2Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, 3 of flight in the paleognath ancestor followed Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, by regain in tinamous (green arrows) or a USA. 4Department of Statistics, Harvard University, minimum of three independent losses of flight in Cambridge, MA, USA. 5School of Biological Sciences, the ratites (dark blue arrows), with at least five University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. 6Centre losses suggested by a proposed sister group for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK. relationship between elephant birds and kiwi (light 7Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, blue arrows; elephant bird branch not shown). New Zealand. 8Jackson School of Geosciences, University of (B) Distribution of the 25 most common gene Texas, Austin, TX, USA. 9Department of Natural History, tree topologies, showing that the species tree Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 10Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University topology (in red and marked with an asterisk) is of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. not the most common gene tree topology. *Corresponding author. Email: tsackton@g.harvard.edu (T.B.S.); sedwards@fas.harvard.edu (S.V.E.) Sackton et al., Science 364,74–78 (2019) 5 April 2019 1of4 RESEARCH | REPORT We analyzed 7654 high-quality gene align- multiple test correction). The larger set of genes in feathers, body size, or other traits, but not ments across 44 species of birds, including nine with selection specifically or predominantly in morphological evolution of forelimbs and related flightless ratites, four volant tinamous, and 21 neo- ratites (regardless of degree of convergence) is skeletal phenotypes such as the loss of a keel. gnaths, to test for convergent evolution in protein- enriched for terms involved in protein meta- We applied profile hidden Markov models to coding genes among ratite lineages (23). We found bolic processes (data S1), but not transcription detect sequence changes that are underrepre- no evidence for an excess of convergent amino factors or proteins with functions in develop- sented in homologs of a protein (33), similar to acid substitutions among ratites (table S5) and ment. This finding suggests that convergent that used to identify putative function-altering minimal evidence for ratite-specific convergent protein-coding evolution in these species may be mutations in protein-coding genes associated with shifts in rates of amino acid divergence (table S6 associated with other phenotypes, such as changes loss of flight in the Galapagos cormorant (34). This and fig. S7). However, we did find 238 genes ex- hibiting positive selection on a subset of codons specifically in ratites, including 63 that are se- lected in multiple species, and an additional 294 genes with positive selection predominately in ratites (>50% of selected branches are ratites). The number of convergently selected genes in ratites is greater than expected under the as- sumption of independent selection in each lin- eage (permutation P < 0.001). However, the degree of convergence we observe declines substantially if we make the conservative assumption that only three independent losses of flight occurred Downloaded from (permutation P = 0.0475; fig. S8); we find no cases of genes positively selected in three inde- pendentlossesofflightundertheconservative Fig. 2. A Bayesian model identifies convergently accelerated CNEEs in ratites. Shown here are loss model (in which flight is lost independently trees for three examples of convergent ratite accelerated

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us