Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/historiameriadoOObruc Qejperia (Ergan3ungsreif)e: S^riften ^ur englifdien pi)iIoIogie l)erausgcgeben Don Qermann dolli^ unb James ID. Brigljt (Ergan3ungsreil|e 2. Ejcft fflSTORIA MERIADOCI AND DE ORTU WALUUANH Two Arthurian Romances of the XIII th Century in Latin Prose edited by J. Douglas Bruce Professor of the English Language and Literature in the University of Tennessee (Bottlngen Dan5ent)oe(t & Hupred)t 1913 Baltimore: ^^c 3o^ns {)op!ins Press 23249 Gedruckt bei Hubert & Co., G. m. b. H. in Gottingen. Table of Contents Page 1. Identical authorship VII 2. Bale's ascription to Robert de Torigui X 3. Date XVI 4. Sources of Historia Meriadoci XXIV 5. Sources of De Ortu Waluuanii XXXV 6. Author LXIV 7. Abstract of Historia Meriadoci LXV 8. Abstract of De Ortu Waluuanii LXX 9. Historia Meriadoci 1 10. De Ortu Waluuanii 54 11. Index of Names 94 Introduction. Since the publication of the first editions of the romances contained in this volume^) two discoveries have been made which render desirable a re-examination of the questions con- cerning the sources of one of them and the date of both. The first of these discoveries was to the effect that both romances are ascribed to Robertus de Monte or Robert de Torigni, as he is variously called (the well-known chronicler and abbot of Mont Saint Michel in Normandy, 1154—1186), in John Bale's Index Britanniae Scriptorum'^). This ascription was first observed ^) De Ortu Waluuanii: an Arthurian romance, now first edited from the Cottonian MS. JBaustina B. VI of the British Museum, by J. Douglas Bruce, Puhlications of the Modern Language Association of America, vol. XIII, pp. 365—456 (1898), and Vita Meriadoci: an Arthurian romance now first edited from the Cottonian MS. Faustina B. VI of the British Museum, by J. Douglas Bruce, ibid. vol. XV, pp. 327—414 (1900). I took the title of the second romance from the old "Elenchus con- tentorum in hoc codice" prefixed to the Cotton MS., but Historia Meriadoci is plainly indicated as the proper title at the beginning of the text, so in this new edition I have followed Miss Morriss's example in adopting this name. In the present edition of these romances the texts have been revised and corrected and the introdiictions re-written and enlarged. '-^) See page 384 f. of this work, edited for the first time by K. L. Poole and Mary Bateson in the Anecdota Oxoniensia: Mediaeval and Modern Series, Part IX, Oxford, 1902. Mr. Poole noted (p. 385, note 1) that the Gesta Walwani and Gesta Marodoci of Bale's entry were identical with the romances in Faustina B. VI, but does not seem to have been aware that I had edited these romances. PA VI Introduction. by Professor Garleton F. Brown, of Bryn Mawr CoUege, Pennsylvania. He communicated his discovery to Miss Margaret Shove Morriss, who, in a paper entitled "The authorship of the De ortu Waluuanii and the Historia Meriadoci'' {Puhlications of tlie Modern Language Association of America^ XXIII, 599 — 645, 1908), endeavors to estabhsh its correctness. The second discovery, made by M. Paul Meyer, relates to fragments of a French romance in octosyllabic couplets which evidently stands in some sort of connection with the source of the De Ortu Waluuanii. These fragments M. Meyer has edited (with critical apparatus) under the title of Les Enfances Gauvain in Romania, XXXIX, 1 — 32 (January, 1910). It is obvious, then, that owing to these discoveries the questions of source and date have been put in a different light and that a new discussion of the principal problems relating to these romances is required. On the other hand, it is doubtful whether a new edition of the texts would have been called for, even in the case of the Meriadoc, for which I have now the advantage of a coUation of the Oxford MS.^), but for the fact that the transcripts of the Gotton MS. on which I relied for my first editions — especially the transcript of the Meriadoc — contained, as it has turned out^), a considerable number of errors, and it seems desirable therefore that a correct impression of these romances should take the place of the older impressions. In the preparation of the new edition circumstances made it impossible for me to coUate the texts, myself, throughout with the original MSS., but Mr. J. A. Herbert of the Department of Manuscripts of the British Museum was so good as to undertake this for me in the case of Faustina B. VI, and the coUation of the Oxford MS. Rawlinson, B. 149 was furnished me by Mrs. New (formerly, Miss A. F. Parker), whose accuracy in work of this character is weU-known to editors of mediaeval texts. It is ^) My attention was first called ' to this MS. by a note in Professor G. L. Kittredge's edition of Arthur and Gorlagon, [Harvard] Studies and Notes in Philology and Literature, VIII, 149, note 4 (1903). ^) I was led to re-examine this matter by M. Paul Meyer's notice of my editions of these romances in Romania, XXXIV, 143 ff. (1905). To be sure, not all of M. Meyer's suggested readings are correct, as will appear from some of the notes below. : Introduction. VII accordingly on these collations of my former editions that the texts in the present volume are based ^). I. Identical Authorskip. In my first edition of the Meriadoc, I remarked (p. 338) that this romance was "evidently by the same author as the De Ortu Waluuanii^^ and in confirmation of this opinion I cited certain similarities in the two romances which are found together in the Gottonian MS., viz. — the situations of the captive princesses in each, Arthur's and GundebaWs methods of testing the knights who seek service under them, and their common tendency to burlesque, as shown by the receipt for the prepa- ration of Greek fire in the De Ortu, (pp. 75 ff. below) and ^) Faustina B. VI is thus described in H. L. D. Ward*s Catalogue of Romances in the Department of MSS. in the British Museum, I, 374 (1883): "Vellum; early XlVth century. Quarto. ff. 39 in double columns, having 35 lines to a column, With initials in bhie and red". Our romances are foUowed in the MS. by 1. Annals, in hands of the 14th century. 2. Lists of monks of Croxden, Staffordshire. 3. Papal letters. 4. Notices of churches and church lands in London that belong to the cathedral church of Canter- bury, in a hand of the 12th century. 5. A calendar obituary of the nunnery of Daunton in Kent (?), in a hand of the 14th century. The Meriadoc covers fols. 2—23, the De Ortu fols. 23 (coL 2)—38b. Rawlinson B. 149 is also a vellum octavo, written at the end of the 14th or beginning of 15th century. For a description of itsee W. D. Macray: Catalogi Codiciim Manuscriptorum Bibliothecae Bodleianae, Part. 5, fasc. 1., cols. 500 f. Historia Meriadoci begins fol. 91a and ends fol. 132b. The text is not written in columns. The contents of the MS. are as follows I. History of the Three Magi. 2. The Latin prose tale (of Welsh origin), Arthur and Gorlagon, edited by Professor Kittredge in the above-mentioned volume of Harvard Studies and Notes. 3. Apollonius of Tyre. 4. Historia Meriadoci. 5. Historia de Preliis [Alexandri Magni]. 6. Aristotle's treatise De Regimine Sanitatis. — On the inside of the back Thomas Hearne, the well known antiquary, has noted that he bought the MS. Dec. 29, 1722. Another note (also Thomas Hearne's, I believe) is to this effect: „The famous Dr. Langbaine's writing". This refers apparently to the table of contents of the MS. which is found on the same page. Miss M. S. Morriss, Publications of the Modern Language Asso- ciation of America, XXIII, 607, wonders whether either of these MSS. is identical with the one which Leland saw in the library of the Norwich Priory. It cant be the latter, however, for this MS. has, p. 10, not silvam Fleuentanam, but silvam cleuentanam or eleuentanam — the first letter is either c or e. Vin Introduction. the description of the mode of preparing food in the forest in the Meriadoc (pp. lOf. below) ^). With regard to the last of these points I do not feel so sure now that the burlesque is intentionaP), but in any event the similarity in spirit be- tween the two descriptions — in each case interrupting a romantic narrative — seems to me indisputable. The stories are, furthermore, similar, inasmuch as they each begin with a narrative of the hero's youth based on a widely diffused folk- tale motif, set in a definite locahty (Rome and Wales respec- tively) which is represented with some degree of historical truth, but later on include fantastic material such as makes up the bulk of the Arthurian romances. Both the De Ortu and the Meriadoc, moreover, show a familiarity with Geoffrey of Monmouth. Looking at the question from the point of view of language, one gains the same impression of identical authorship. Most obvious is the extravagant rhetoric which characterizes the style of both^) and which, as appears from ^) Notice how the same words recur in the following sentences of the two descriptions : "Fit quoque et virga aerea. cuius curuata summitas ad modum clepsedre coaptatur, qua paruum foramen quod in uasis cooperculi patet uertice vi prioribus ohturatur diebus", Be Ortu, p. 77, and 'Ter illud autem spacium a maiori ad humiliorem foveam fit oblique haut magnum foramen quod clepsedra vel sude obturatur", Meriadoc, p.