Nonperturbative φ4 potentials: Phase transitions and light horizons Yuan Shi∗ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA (Dated: July 12, 2021) It is commonly believed that a massive real scalar field φ only mediates short-range interactions on the scale of its Compton wavelength via the Yukawa potential. However, in the nonperturba- tive regime of nonlinear self coupling, φ can also mediate larger scale interactions. Moreover, the classical potential, namely, the static configuration of φ in the presence of an external source, is not always unique for given boundary conditions. In this paper, a complete set of finite-energy potentials (FEPs) induced by a Gaussian source is identified in one, two, and three spatial dimensions when the nonlinearity is of the Mexican-hat type, which is often prescribed to induce spontaneous sym- metry breaking. In the size-strength parameter space of the source, phase boundaries are mapped out, across which the number of FEPs differ. Additionally, softer phase transitions are delineated according to whether the potential exhibits a light horizon at which φ vanishes. The light horizon is of physical significance when φ couples with other particles. For example, when φ is the Higgs field, all elementary particles become massless at the light horizon. It is remarkable that white dwarfs and neutron stars are potentially in a phase where light horizons exist, whose outer radii are a few times the star sizes. Moreover, suppose elementary fermions of mass greater than ∼ 103 GeV exist, then they may also be surrounded by light horizons with radii comparable to the Higgs Compton wave- length. Finally, nonperturbative states may also be realized in condensed matter systems, wherein phase transitions are controllable using localized sources. I. INTRODUCTION Another example is the Yukawa potential, which arises due to the φ ¯ coupling: When the expectation value of ¯ In the presence of nonlinearities, solutions to classi- fermions h i is nonzero, the classical field equation for cal field equations may contain configurations that are φ acquires a finite source term. The significance of an ex- distinct from wave-like solutions [1]. For example, in one ternal source is that it adds to the energy integral a term spatial dimension, a self-interacting real scalar field φ ex- whose sign is indefinite. Consequently, Derrick's theo- hibits kink solutions [2], whose asymptotic values φ(+1) rem [9], which uses a scaling argument to show that spe- and φ(−∞) are different. In two spatial dimensions, with cific finite-energy configurations only exist in specific spa- a complex scalar field coupling to a U(1) gauge field, lo- tial dimensions, no longer applies. Moreover, the source calized vortex solutions exist for which the scalar field term also appears in the conservation law of topologi- is depleted at locations where the magnetic flux pene- cal charges, so field configurations in different topological trates [3]. Other nontrivial field configurations exist in classes become connected via the external source. Since higher dimensions when the gauge group is nonabelian, we are living in a universe that is filled with matter, and such as monopoles in three spatial dimensions [4, 5] and possibly dark matter [10], it is important to also consider instantons in four spatial dimensions [6]. Nonperturba- field configurations in the presence of external sources. tive field configurations are not topologically equivalent As an example of smooth and localized sources, this pa- to the trivial vacuum, in the sense that they cannot be per will focus on an isolated Gaussian. Sources of other obtained by continuously deforming of the vacuum at a profiles, which will be briefly discussed in Sec. IV, lead finite energy cost. Moreover, configurations that have to similar features. On a microscopic scale, the Gaus- different topological charges are also disconnected from sian source may approximate the wave packet of a single each other in perturbation theory, so each topologically particle; On a macroscopic scale, the Gaussian source arXiv:2107.04206v1 [hep-ph] 9 Jul 2021 equivalent class must be included separately in path inte- may approximate the averaged distribution of an aggre- grals [7]. Accounting for nonperturbative configurations gated amount of matter. Regardless of the physical origin may lead to additional terms in the effective Lagrangian, of the source term, the resultant spherically symmetric which may have profound consequences, including break- static field configuration in D spatial dimension satisfies ing the fundamental symmetries of the field theory [8]. @2φ D − 1 @φ @U + = + S ; (1) In this paper, I will show that additional nonpertur- @r2 r @r @φ bative field configurations exist in the presence of ex- ternal sources. External sources arise when one focuses where U(φ) is the self interaction potential and S (r) on a subsystem of a bigger problem. A familiar exam- is the source term. The physical significance of static ple is the Coulomb potential, which acquires a nontriv- field configurations is that they provide low-energy ial configuration when external charges are prescribed. descriptions of the φ-mediated interaction between a test particle and the external source when their rela- tive motion is nonrelativistic. For a Gaussain source, S = (α=aDπD=2) exp(−r2=a2), which becomes a D- ∗ [email protected] dimensional δ-function when a ! 0. Knowing φ due 2 to the δ-function source is sufficient for linear theories, Among an infinite number of solutions to the static in which potentials resultant from other sources can be field equation, only a countable number of potentials have constructed using convolutions. However, in nonlinear finite energy. The energy of a given field configuration R D 1 2 1 2 theories, the behavior of φ is qualitatively different for is E = d x[ 2 (@tφ) + 2 (rφ) + U + S φ], and the sources of different size a and strength α. The goal of time derivative vanishes for static field configurations. this paper is to map out the behaviors of φ in the source For spherically symmetric source and potentials, E = 2 2−D size-strength parameter space. v m σD−1H, where σD is the surface area of the unit R 1 D−1 Apart from the external source, the other key ingredi- D-sphere, and the normalized energy H = 0 dρρ E. ent for nontrivial field configurations is the nonlinearity, The normalized energy density is which enters via the self interaction potential. A particu- 1 1 larly important case is the Maxican-hat potential which, E = p2 + (q2 − 1)2 + Sq; (4) up to some shifts and rescalings, can be written as 2 8 2 2 λ where S = S0 exp(−ρ =R ). The extremum of H, which U = (φ2 − v2)2; (2) satisfies δH/δq = 0, leads to Eq. (3). To have a finite en- 4! ergy, the potential must be well behaved near the origin, where the constant v > 0 is the vacuum expectation value which is possible because the smoothness of the source (VEV) and the coupling constant λ > 0 so that the the- regularizes the behavior of q at ρ ∼ 0. Then, a finite ory is temporally stable. The Maxican-hat potential is energy only requires that E approaches zero faster than often prescribed to model spontaneous symmetry break- ρ−D when ρ ! 1. Since S falls off rapidly, the energy ing: There exist two degenerate ground states φ = ±v is finite as long as q approaches ±1 faster than ρ−D=2. in the absence of source terms. Spontaneous symmetry In fact, when the source term vanishes and q ! ±1, the breaking plays an important role in field theories. For potentials becomes the Yukawa potential, which falls off example, in the phenomenological model of superconduc- as ∼ exp(−ρ)/ρ(D−1)=2 when ρ ! 1. Therefore, the tivity [11], a U(1) version of the spontaneous symmetry spherically symmetric potential is of finite energy if and breaking emulates effects of Cooper-pair formation below only if p(0) = 0 and q(1) = ±1. the superconducting transition temperature [12]. More- For a given boundary condition, the existence and over, in the standard model of particle physics, an SU(2) uniqueness of finite-energy potentials (FEPs) are not version of the spontaneous symmetry breaking is invoked guaranteed. To see why, notice that as a classical dynam- to explain a finite Higgs VEV that endows elementary ical system, Eq. (3) has three fixed points in the qp-phase particles with their masses [13]. space at (0; 0) and (±1; 0) when S0 = 0. While (0; 0) is Given the source and the nonlinearity as two key ingre- a stable fixed point, (±1; 0) are unstable saddle points. dients, to study classical potentials, namely, static field In other words, the boundary conditions q(1) = ±1, configurations, it is convenient to nondimensionalized the which may lead to FEPs that are stable against tempo- field equation. In the natural units ~ = c = 1, since the ral fluctuations, are associated with solutions that are R D 1 2 unpredictable against spatial uncertainties. This intrigu- action dtd x[ 2 (@µφ) − U − S φ] is dimensionless, φ has the mass dimension (D − 1)=2. Then, in Eq. (2), ing situation, although perhaps not surprising, may be v has the same unit as φ, the self coupling λ has the better appreciated through the following thought exper- mass dimension 3 − D, and the strength of the Gaus- iment: Suppose an experimentalist measures the Higgs sian source α has the mass dimension (3 − D)=2. Thus, expectation value hφi to be v1 near the sea level of Earth, a natural scheme to nondimensionalize Eq. (1) is to de- which serves as a localized source; and another experi- fine q = φ/v; ρ = rm; R = am, and A = αmD−2=v.