Short-Term Toxicity Effects of Prymnesium Parvum on Zooplankton Community Composition; Aquatic Sciences; Witt Et Al.; University of Oklahoma; [email protected]

Short-Term Toxicity Effects of Prymnesium Parvum on Zooplankton Community Composition; Aquatic Sciences; Witt Et Al.; University of Oklahoma; Dhambright@Ou.Edu

Aquatic Sciences (2019) 81:55 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0651-2 Aquatic Sciences RESEARCH ARTICLE Short‑term toxicity efects of Prymnesium parvum on zooplankton community composition Brenda A. Witt1,2 · Jessica E. Beyer1 · Thayer C. Hallidayschult1 · K. David Hambright1 Received: 13 November 2018 / Accepted: 29 June 2019 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract Harmful algal blooms (HABs) can disrupt aquatic communities through a variety of mechanisms, especially through toxin production. Herbivorous and omnivorous zooplankton may be particularly susceptible to HAB toxins, due to their close trophic relationship to algae as grazers. In this study, the acute toxigenic efects of the haptophyte Prymnesium parvum on a zooplankton community were investigated under laboratory conditions. Total zooplankton abundances decreased during 48-h exposure, although species responses to P. parvum densities varied. Changes in community composition were driven by declines in Daphnia mendotae and Keratella spp. abundances, which resulted in an average shift in copepod abundance from 47.1 to 72.4%, and rotifer abundance from 35.0 to 7.1%. Total cladocerans were relatively unchanged in relative abundance (11.1–10.4%), though the dominant cladoceran shifted from Daphnia mendotae (61.3% of cladocerans) to Bosmina longiro- stris (81.5% of cladocerans). Daphnia mendotae and Keratella spp. are known to be non-selective or generalist feeders and were likely harmed through a combination of ingestion of and contact by P. parvum. Proportional increases in copepod and Bosmina abundances in the presence of P. parvum likely refect selective or discriminate feeding abilities in these taxa. This study corroborates previous feld studies showing that P. parvum can negatively afect zooplankton, refecting species-specifc diferences in zooplankton-P. parvum interactions. Such changes can alter zooplankton community composition, leading to substantial food-web consequences and potential long-term ecosystem-level impacts in lakes that experience blooms. Keywords Acute toxicity · Harmful algae · Zooplankton community · Zooplankton feeding behavior Introduction afected community (Lampert 1987; DeMott and Mueller- Navarra 1997; Granéli and Johansson 2003a, b). Addition- Harmful algal blooms (HABs) dominate pelagic phytoplank- ally, HABs directly and deleteriously afect a wide range ton worldwide (Huisman et al. 2005; Granéli and Turner of aquatic organisms, including fsh, mussels, zooplankton, 2006; Hudnell 2008; Shumway et al. 2018). A variety of and other microbial species (James and De La Cruz 1989; mechanisms have been hypothesized to explain HAB domi- Guo et al. 1996; Landsberg 2002; Shumway et al. 2003; nance: toxicity, low nutritional value for grazers, increased Glibert et al. 2005), thereby changing the entire structure of competitive abilities following environmental change, and an aquatic food web (Sunda et al. 2006). subsequent ability to produce strong bottom-up efects in the The toxigenic, haptophyte alga Prymnesium parvum Carter 1937 forms HABs in fresh waters, presumably Electronic supplementary material The online version of this having acclimated from its marine origins (Edvardsen article (https ://doi.org/10.1007/s0002 7-019-0651-2) contains and Paasche 1998). Since the frst known appearance of supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Prymnesium in the U.S. in the Pecos River, TX in 1985, it has spread to 23 other states (Roelke et al. 2016). A * K. David Hambright [email protected] suite of cytolytic, hemolytic, and ichthyotoxic toxins are produced by Prymnesium, evidenced by massive fsh kills 1 Plankton Ecology and Limnology Laboratory, Department observed during blooms (Johansson and Granéli 1999; of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, Legrand et al. 2001; Granéli and Johansson 2003b; Baker USA et al. 2007; Roelke et al. 2007). While the mechanism of 2 Present Address: Redlands Community College, El Reno, toxin delivery is hypothesized to be the release of toxins OK 73036, USA Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 55 Page 2 of 8 B. A. Witt et al. into the surrounding water (Tillmann 1998; Skovgaard Methods and Hansen 2003; Tillmann 2003; Blossom et al. 2014), evolutionary considerations and controlled experimenta- Study site and zooplankton collection tion reveal that cell-to-cell contact may be necessary to produce toxicity to fsh (Lewis 1986; Jonsson et al. 2009; Lake Texoma has a history of Prymnesium blooms that Remmel and Hambright 2012). typically have been isolated to the western regions of the At the front line of interaction with harmful algae (HA), lake where salinity is higher due to infow from the Red such as Prymnesium, are zooplankton—the nexus of pri- River. Intermittent Prymnesium blooms have occurred mary production and higher-level consumers, such as fsh. in Lake Texoma since 2001. The environmental condi- Much is known about the physiological responses of indi- tions conducive to blooms of Prymnesium have been well vidual zooplankton exposed to HA (Colin and Dam 2002; studied. While lab studies and lake surveys have revealed Remmel et al. 2011). Feeding experiments have confrmed a wide range of salinity tolerances for P. parvum (Roe- that non-selective suspension feeders like Daphnia and lke et al. 2007; Hambright et al. 2014; Rashel and Patiño Brachionus are highly vulnerable to P. parvum (Barreiro 2017), a salinity of 1.67 psu and cooler water temperatures et al. 2005; Remmel et al. 2011), and a long-term monitor- are generally required for bloom formation in Lake Tex- ing study of a recurrent bloom of P. parvum led Hambright oma (Hambright et al. 2015), the salinity tolerance perhaps et al. (2010) to hypothesize that species’ feeding guilds refecting Prymnesium’s origins in coastal marine systems. may explain observed species-specific responses. For Blooms in Texoma have tended to be restricted to coves example, copepods and some cladocerans (e.g., Bosmina) where salinity elevations are common during relatively dry are more selective than other zooplankters (DeMott 1982, winters (Hambright et al. 2010, 2015). Large and devastat- 1995; Hambright et al. 2007b), and this feeding behav- ing fsh kills have resulted from these blooms, though fsh ior may mediate responses to HA, as has been shown for community recovery has been swift, likely due to the small cyanobacterial blooms (Sommer et al. 2001; Hambright scale of blooms and subsequent fsh immigration from et al. 2007b). Other studies, including short-term mes- unafected areas of the lake (Zamor et al. 2014). The fate ocosm manipulations, have also indicated differential of afected zooplankton communities is less well studied. vulnerabilities of herbivorous zooplankton to P. parvum Long-term monitoring of Prymnesium cell densities (Errera et al. 2008; Schwierzke et al. 2010). Addition- across the lake, both littoral and pelagic, has provided a ally, cladoceran and rotifer abundances declined before clear picture of the seasonal dynamics of blooms (Ham- copepod abundances during a P. parvum bloom in Lake bright et al. 2010) and ofered the opportunity to study Koronia, further supporting diferential responses among zooplankton communities based on prior exposure. zooplankton taxa (Michaloudi et al. 2009). But despite Because adaptation or acclimation may lead to toxin all the knowledge of the efects of HA on individual zoo- resistance due to long-term exposure, and could confound plankters and zooplankton taxa, little is known about the interpretation of the immediate efects on a zooplankton immediate efects of HABs on zooplankton communities. community during a bloom, this study used a community The aim of this study was to separate the direct acute that has not experienced high bloom densities, yet has the toxicity impacts of Prymnesium on zooplankton commu- potential to encounter a Prymnesium bloom in the future nity structure in Lake Texoma (OK-TX, USA) from the (Hambright et al. 2014). Zooplankton were collected longer-term indirect impacts, such as zooplankton com- from the Soldier Creek Inlet (33.927829, − 96.682097, munity interactions and shifts in algal food quality. An see Fig. 1 in Hambright et al. 2010), an area of the lake environmentally controlled, two-day microcosm study for which Prymnesium cell densities to date have never with a semi-natural zooplankton assemblage and varying exceeded 3000 cells mL −1, thus reducing the chances of Prymnesium cell densities was used to test for diferen- exposure-mitigated toxin resistance. tial survivorship within a zooplankton community. Rem- Zooplankton were collected on 9 May 2014 using verti- mel et al. (2011) hypothesized that zooplankton feeding cal tows of 63-µm- and 350-μm-mesh Wisconsin plankton behavior might provide an explanation of the community nets. In addition, water was collected at ~ 1-m depth using shifts observed in southern US reservoir during P. parvum a Van Dorn sampler and fltered through 20-μm-mesh blooms (Hambright et al. 2010), as feeding mechanisms Nitex netting to remove all zooplankton and large colonial and selectivity are likely to mediate exposure to toxins. algae, while still providing a suitable algal community to The prediction was that, when exposed to increasing con- serve as food for the zooplankton. This procedure provided centrations of P. parvum, non-selective grazers would drop a semi-natural environment inclusive of the grazeable out of the community frst and selective feeders would assemblage of phytoplankton [but not containing Prym- dominate.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us