CENSUS OF INDIA 1961 MADHYA PRADESH" DISTRICT CENSUS HANDBOOK GUNA DISTRICT e. JAGATHPATHI OF THE INDIAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE SUPERINTI£NDENT OF CENSUS OPERATIONS, MADHYA PRADESH PUBLIS~~ BY THE GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH 1964 :a:g6:a: CENSUS PUBLIcATIONS, MADHYA PJlADESH (AU the Ce'R3U8 Publications of this State will bea.r Volume No. VIII) PART I General Report including Subsidiary Tables (in Sub-Parts) PART II-A Genera) Population Tables PART II-B Economic Tables (in Sub-parts) PART II-C Cultural and Migration Tables (in Sub-Parts) PART III Household Economic Tables PART IV Housing and Establishment Tables (in­ (in Sub-parts) cluding Subsidiary Tables) and Report PART V Special Tables for Scheduled Castes and (in Sub-parts) Scheduled Tribes PART VI Village Survey Monographs (A Separate Sub­ part for each Village Surveyed) PART VII Survey of Handicrafts of the State (A Separate Sub-part for each Handicraft Surveyed) PART VIlI-A Administration Report - Enumeration PART VIII-B Administration Report-Tabulation I'ART IX Maps STATE PUBLICATIONS DISTRICT· . CENSUS HAND BOOKS District CensllS Hand-books Cor each of the 43 Districts in Madhya Pradesh PREFACE The publication of District Cens.us Hand-books, which was begun. in the 1951 Census, represents a significant step in the process of making census statistics available for the smaller territorial units basic to executive and developmental administration. Apart from the fact that the proper implementation of policy depends on the ability of the administrative authorities concerned to quantify accurately the variables involved, it is at these levels that policies get really thoroughly tested; also, policies can fail-and probably have failed-because their statistical basis was weak. It is undoubtedly necessary that gaps in statistics at lower levels be fined as rapidly as possible. It was not possible at this Census to base all censu:> statistics on the development block as the unit mainly because ,in 1961 there were many areas not till then covered by blocks. The coverage had become complete by about the middle of 1963 and it is not unlikely that the 1971 Census will recognise the b!ock as the basic field unit as much for purposes of presentation as for operational purposes. 2. What we have tried to do in the 1961 Census Hand.,.books is to make them more informative by the inclusion of as many categories of non-census statistics as possible; some of these are climate, agriculture, co-operation, industry, bank­ ing, education, health etc. There is also an introductory note to each Hand­ book high-lighting the more striking featuns. It has not been possible· for the Census Organisation to check the accuracy of the figures supplied by various authorities; it is to be hoped that some other organisation, better equipped for the purpose, will take up this task. 3. For the seventeen districts of Mahakoshal (Part of erstwhile Madhya Pradesh) and for Panna and Tikamgarh districts of erstwhile Vindhya Pradesh, which are part of the present State of Madhya Pradesh, the area figures for districts and tahsils furnished by the Director of Land Records and presented in Table A-I are internally inconsistent in the sense that the tahsil areas do not add up to the district area. This inconsistency arose from the fact that, in the case of these districts, the district area includes, but the tahsil areas exclude, 'forest' area for which the tahsilwise breakup was not then available. Later on, while this Hand-book was in the press, the Director of Land Records brought out revised area figures for the year 1952-63 for tahsils and districts, which among other improvements, do not suffer from the defect of internal 2 inconsistency even in case of these nineteen districts. Revision of Table A-I on the basis of these area figures was not feasible at this late stage; the only alternative was to print these revised area figures also in this Hand-book. 4. One unfortunate fact about these Hand-books is that they became avail­ able to the users rather late in the decade. This is partly due to the considerable time required for the collection of information from various authorities. and partly to difficulties in printing. Owing to the fact that State presses, with a heavy back­ log of printing weighing down on them, would find it impossible to print all the District Census Hand-books themselves, arrangements have been made for printing them in private presses. If these Hand-books are to have a useful life of more than four or five years of inter-censal decennium, more expeditious methods for the collection of non-census statistics, for the preparation and checking of the manuscripts and for printing will have to be devised. 5. The Census Organisation is grateful to the Government of Madhya Pradesh for having been so kind as to undertake the publication of these Hand­ books and to the Superintendent, Government Printing and his organisation­ particularly the Assistant Superintendent, Printing, Government Regional Press, Indore and his staff--for the printing arrangements' made. The inspiration behind this ambitious venture is that of our indefatigable Registrar General, Shri Asok Mitra, to whom we are all deeply grateful. Our thanks are also ·due to the various authorities who supplied us with all the necessary statistics. G. JAGATHPATHI CONTENTS Pages Notes and Explanations .. i-1'ii Appendix I Standard Industrial Classification viii-xvi Appendix II National Classification of Occupations xvii-xxiii Selected Statistics Selected Statistics of India, Madhya Pradesh, Divisions, Dis­ tricts and Important Towns of Madhya Pradesh xxiv-xxxiii Revised Area and Density Figures xxxiv-xxxvi Introducing the District xxxvii-ivi PART I A-GENERAL POPULATION TABLES 3-9 Table A-I Area, Houses and Population 3 Appendix I Statement showing 1951 Territorial units constituting the prpsent set up 4 Annexure to Appendix 1 5 Appendix III Houseless and Institutional population 6 Table A-II Variation in population during sixty years 7 Appendix District and Tahsils showing 1951 population according to their territorialjurisdiclion in 1951, changes in area and population involved in those changes .7 Table A-ill Villages classified by population 8 Table A-IV Towns (and town-Groups) classified by population in 1961 with variation since 1901 . .. • . .. 9 B-ECONOMIC TABLES 10-103 (i) General Economic Tables 10-75 PriDltlry Census Abstract 10-11 Table B-1 Workers and non-workers classified by sex and broad age­ groups 12-13 Table B--III Part A Industrial classification of workers and non-workers by educational levels in urban areas only 14-15 Part B Industrial classification of workers and non-workers by educational levels in rural areas only 16-17 Table B-IV • Part A IndustrIal classification by sex and class of worker of persons at work at Household Industry .. 18-20 Part B Industrial classification by sex and class of worker of per­ sons at work in Non-Household Industry, trade, busi­ ness, profession or service 21-26 Part C Industrial classification by Sex and Divisions, Major groups and Minor groups of persons at work other than Culti­ vation 27-37 1J Pages Table B-V Occupational Classification by Sex of Persons at work other than Cultivation. 38·55 Table 8-VI Occupational Divisions of Persons at work other than Cul­ tivation classified by Sex, Broad Age-groups and Edu­ cationallevels in Urban areas only 56-59 Table 8-VII Part A Persons working principally (i) As Cultivators, (ii) As Agri­ cultural Labourers or (iii) At Household Industry classi· fled by Sex and by Secondary work, 0) At Household Industry (ii) As Cultivators or (iii) As Agricultural Labourers 60-62 Part B Industrial Classification by Sex of Persons working in Non­ Household Industry, Trade, Business, Profession or Service who are also engaged in Household Industry 63-69 Table B-VDJ Part A Persons unemployed aged 15 and above by Sex. Broad age~ groups and Educational levels in Urban areas only 70-71 Part B Persons unemployed aged 15 and above by Sex and Educa­ tional Levels in Rural areas only 70-71 Table B-IX Persons not at work- classified by Sex, :Sroad age-groups and type of activity 72-75 (ii) Housebold Economic Tables 76-103 Table B.X Sample Households 0) engaged neither in cultivation nor in Household Industry, (ii) engaged either in Cultivation or Household Industry but not in both and (iii) engaged both in Cultivation and Household Industry for an areas 76 Table B-XI Sample Households engaged in cultivation classified by interest in land and size of land cultivated in rural and urban areas separately 77 Table B-XII Sample Households engaged in cultivation only classified by size of land cultivated and number of family workers and hired workers in rural and urban areas separately 78-81 Table B-XIII Sample households engaged both in cultivation and house­ hold industry showing size of land cultivated classified by principal household industry in rural and urban areas separately 82-83 Table B·XIV Sample households engaged only in household industry classified by prinCipal household industry in all areas 84-87 Part A Households classified by major groups of principal house­ hold industry and number of persons engaged 84-85 Part B Households classified by minor groups of principal house­ hold industry 86-87 iii Pages Table B-XV Sample households engaged both in cultivation and house· hold industry classified by size of land in rural and urban areas separately 88-91 TableB-XVI Sample principal household industry classified by duration of work in a year and total number of workers engaged in household industry in all areas 92-101 Table B-XVII Sample households classified by size and participation in household cultivation or industry 102·103 C-SOCIAL AND CULruRAL TABLES 104-115 Table C-I Family composition of sample households by relationship to bead of family classified by size of land cultivated 104 Table C-U Age and marital status .