FREE RICHARD THE SECOND PDF William Shakespeare,William Dolan Shakespeare | 113 pages | 09 Jan 2001 | Penguin Books Australia | 9780140714821 | English | Hawthorn, Australia Richard II of England - Wikipedia Although the First Folio edition of Shakespeare's works lists the play as a history play, the earlier Quarto edition of calls it The tragedie of King Richard the second. The play spans only the last two years of Richard's life, from to The first Act begins with King Richard sitting majestically on his throne in full state, having been requested to arbitrate a dispute between Thomas Mowbray and Richard's cousin, Henry Bolingbroke, later Henry Richard the Secondwho has accused Mowbray of squandering money given to him by Richard for the king's soldiers and of murdering Bolingbroke's uncle, the Duke of Gloucester. Bolingbroke's father, John of Gaunt1st Duke of Lancaster, meanwhile, believes it was Richard himself who was responsible for his brother's murder. After several attempts to calm both men, Richard acquiesces and it is determined that the matter be resolved in the established method of trial by battle between Bolingbroke and Mowbray, despite the objections of Gaunt. The tournament scene is very formal with a long, ceremonial introduction, but as the combatants are about to fight, Richard interrupts and sentences both to banishment from England. Bolingbroke is originally sentenced to ten years' banishment, but Richard reduces this to six years upon seeing John of Gaunt's grieving face, while Mowbray is banished permanently. The king's decision can be seen as the first mistake in a series leading eventually to his overthrow and death, since it is an error which highlights many of his Richard the Second flaws, displaying as it does indecisiveness in terms of whether to allow the duel to go aheadabruptness Richard waits until the last possible moment to cancel the dueland arbitrariness there is no apparent reason why Bolingbroke should Richard the Second allowed to return and Mowbray not. In addition, the decision fails to dispel the suspicions surrounding Richard's involvement in the death of the Duke of Gloucester — in fact, by handling the situation so high-handedly and offering no coherent explanation for his reasoning, Richard only manages to appear more guilty. Mowbray predicts that the king will sooner or later fall at the hands of Bolingbroke. John of Gaunt dies and Richard II seizes all of his land and money. This angers the nobility, who accuse Richard of wasting England's money, of taking Gaunt's money belonging by rights to his son, Bolingbroke to fund war in Ireland, of taxing the commoners, and of fining the nobles for crimes committed by their ancestors. There remain, however, subjects who continue to be faithful to the king, among them Bushy, Bagot, Green and the Duke of Aumerle son of the Duke Richard the Second Yorkcousin of both Richard and Bolingbroke. When King Richard leaves England to attend to the war in Ireland, Bolingbroke seizes the opportunity to assemble an army and invades the north coast of England. Executing both Bushy and Green, he wins over the Duke of York, whom Richard has left in Richard the Second of his government in his absence. Upon Richard's return, Bolingbroke not Richard the Second reclaims his lands but lays claim to the very throne. Aumerle and others plan a rebellion against the new king, but York discovers his son's treachery and reveals it to Henry, who spares Aumerle as a result of the intercession of the Duchess of York while executing the other conspirators. After interpreting King Henry's "living fear" as a reference to the still-living Richard, an ambitious nobleman Exton goes to the prison and murders him. King Henry repudiates the murderer and vows to journey to Jerusalem to cleanse himself of his part in Richard's death. Shakespeare's primary source for Richard IIas for most of his chronicle histories, was Raphael Holinshed 's Chronicles ; the publication of the second edition in provides a terminus post quem for the play. This play, which exists in one incomplete manuscript copy at the British Museum is subtitled Thomas of Woodstockand it is by this name that scholars since F. Boas have usually called it. This play treats the events Richard the Second up to the start of Shakespeare's play though Richard the Second two texts do not Richard the Second identical characters. This closeness, along with the anonymity of the manuscript, has led certain scholars to attribute all or part of the play to Shakespeare, though many critics view this play as a secondary influence on Shakespeare, not as his work. The second and third quartos followed in — the only time a Shakespeare play was printed in three editions in two years. Q4 followed inand Q5 in The play was next published in the First Folio in Richard II exists in Richard the Second number of variations. The quartos vary to some degree from one another, and the folio presents further differences. The first three quartos printed in andcommonly assumed to have been prepared from Shakespeare's holograph lack the deposition scene. The fourth quarto, published inincludes a version of the deposition scene shorter than the one later printed, presumably from a prompt-bookin the First Folio. The scant evidence makes explaining these differences largely conjectural. Traditionally, it has been supposed that the quartos lack the deposition scene because of censorship, either from the playhouse or by the Master of the Revels Edmund Tylney and that the Folio version may better reflect Shakespeare's original intentions. There is no external evidence for this hypothesis, however, and the title page of the quarto refers to a "lately acted" deposition scene although, again, this could be due to earlier censorship which was later relaxed. The play is divided into five acts and its structure is as formal as its language. Elliott Jr. The normal structure of Shakespearean tragedy is modified to portray a central political theme: the rise of Bolingbroke to the throne and the conflict between Richard and Bolingbroke over the kingship. Literary critic Hugh M. Richmond notes that Richard's beliefs about the Divine Right of Kings tend to fall more in line with the medieval view of the throne. Bolingbroke on the other hand represents a more modern view of the throne, arguing that not only bloodline but also intellect and political savvy contribute to the makings of a good king. Elliott argues that this mistaken notion of his role as king ultimately leads to Richard's failure. Elliott goes on further to point out that it is Bolingbroke's ability to relate Richard the Second speak with those of the middle and lower classes that allows him to Richard the Second the throne. Unusually for Shakespeare, Richard II is written entirely in verseand this is one Richard the Second only four plays of his which are, the others being King John and the first and third parts of Henry VI. It thus contains no prose. There are also great differences in the use of language amongst Richard the Second characters. Traditionally, Shakespeare uses prose to distinguish social classes — the upper class generally speaks in poetry while the lower classes speak in prose. In Richard IIwhere there is no prose, Richard uses flowery, metaphorical language in his speeches whereas Bolingbroke, who is also of the noble class, uses a more plain and direct language. In Richard II besides the usual blank verse unrhymed pentameters there are long stretches of heroic Richard the Second pairs of rhymed pentameters. The play contains a number of memorable metaphors, including the extended comparison of England with a garden in Act III, Scene iv and of its reigning king to a lion or to the sun in Act IV. The language of Richard II is more eloquent than that of the earlier history plays, and serves to set the tone and Richard the Second of the play. Shakespeare uses lengthy verses, metaphors, similesand soliloquies to reflect Richard's character as a man who likes to analyse situations rather than act upon them. He always speaks in tropes using analogies such as the sun as a symbol of his kingly status. Richard places great emphasis on symbols which govern his behaviour. His crown serves as a symbol of his royal power and is of more concern to Richard the Second than his actual kingly duties. The play was performed and published late in the reign of the childless Elizabeth I of Englandat a time when the queen's advanced age made the succession an important political concern. The historical parallels in the succession of Richard Richard the Second may not have Richard the Second intended as political comment on the contemporary situation, [11] with the weak Richard II analogous to Queen Elizabeth and an implicit Richard the Second in favour of her replacement by a monarch capable of creating a stable dynasty, but lawyers investigating John Hayward 's historical work, The First Part of the Life and Raigne of King Henrie IVa book previously believed to have taken from Shakespeare's Richard IIchose to make this connection. Samuel Schoenbaum contests that Hayward had written his work prior to Richard IIjoking that "there is nothing like a hypothetical manuscript to resolve an awkwardness of chronology", as Hayward noted he had written the work several years before its publication. That Hayward had made his dedication was fortunate for Shakespeare, otherwise he too might have lost his liberty over the affair. Shakespeare's play appears to have played a minor role in the events surrounding the final downfall of Richard the Second.