<p><a href="/goto?url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal?utm_source=repository.uchastings.edu%2Fhastings_law_journal%2Fvol16%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;utm_medium=PDF&amp;utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages" target="_blank"><strong>Hastings Law Journal </strong></a></p><p>|</p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><a href="/goto?url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol16?utm_source=repository.uchastings.edu%2Fhastings_law_journal%2Fvol16%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;utm_medium=PDF&amp;utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages" target="_blank">Volume 16</a><a href="/goto?url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol16?utm_source=repository.uchastings.edu%2Fhastings_law_journal%2Fvol16%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;utm_medium=PDF&amp;utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages" target="_blank">&nbsp;</a><a href="/goto?url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol16/iss3?utm_source=repository.uchastings.edu%2Fhastings_law_journal%2Fvol16%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;utm_medium=PDF&amp;utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages" target="_blank">Issue 3 </a></li><li style="flex:1"><a href="/goto?url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol16/iss3/3?utm_source=repository.uchastings.edu%2Fhastings_law_journal%2Fvol16%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;utm_medium=PDF&amp;utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages" target="_blank">Article 3 </a></li></ul><p></p><p>1-1965 </p><p>Direct Action and the Struggle for Integration </p><p>Mulford Q. Sibley </p><p>Follow this and additional works at: <a href="/goto?url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal?utm_source=repository.uchastings.edu%2Fhastings_law_journal%2Fvol16%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;utm_medium=PDF&amp;utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages" target="_blank">h</a><a href="/goto?url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal?utm_source=repository.uchastings.edu%2Fhastings_law_journal%2Fvol16%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;utm_medium=PDF&amp;utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages" target="_blank">t</a><a href="/goto?url=https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal?utm_source=repository.uchastings.edu%2Fhastings_law_journal%2Fvol16%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;utm_medium=PDF&amp;utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages" target="_blank">ps://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal </a></p><p>Part of the <a href="/goto?url=http://network.bepress.com/hgg/discipline/578?utm_source=repository.uchastings.edu%2Fhastings_law_journal%2Fvol16%2Fiss3%2F3&amp;utm_medium=PDF&amp;utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages" target="_blank">Law Commons </a><br>Recommended Citation </p><p>Mulford Q. Sibley, <em>Direct Action and the Struggle for Integration</em>, 16 Hastings L.J. 351 (1965). </p><p>Available at: htps://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol16/iss3/3 </p><p>is Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. </p>