Integrating Microorganisms Into the Study of Succession

Integrating Microorganisms Into the Study of Succession

+ MODEL Research in Microbiology xx (2010) 1e8 www.elsevier.com/locate/resmic Changes through time: integrating microorganisms into the study of succession Noah Fierer a,*, Diana Nemergut b,c, Rob Knight d, Joseph M. Craine e a Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA b Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA c Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA d Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA e Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA Received 9 March 2010; accepted 1 June 2010 Abstract Ecologists have documented the process of plant succession for centuries, yet the successional patterns exhibited by microbial communities have received relatively little attention. We examine recent work on microbial succession and show how, despite some key differences, studies of plant succession can serve as a template for understanding microbial succession. We divide the broad range of patterns of microbial primary succession into three categories based on the source of carbon inputs and present conceptual models for each of these categories to explain and predict microbial succession patterns. We show how studies of microbial succession can lead to the development of more comprehensive ecological models of succession and improve our understanding of the processes that regulate microbial diversity in natural and man-made environments. Ó 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Keywords: Microbial colonization; Microbial communities; Microbial diversity; Succession 1. Introduction research topics as plaque formation on teeth, microbial colo- nization and corrosion of pipes, the production of fermented Research on succession, defined here as the somewhat foods, and composting could all be considered examples of orderly and predictable manner by which communities change microbial succession (Table 1). over time following the colonization of a new environment, Methodological limitations have made it difficult for ecol- has been central to the development of ecological theories for ogists to adequately document microbial succession. Micro- over a century. However, the vast majority of this research has bial communities are highly diverse, community composition focused on plant communities with succession in microbial can change rapidly and the vast majority of microbial taxa communities receiving far less attention. Given that most of cannot be identified using standard culture-based methodolo- the phylogenetic diversity on earth is microbial (Pace, 1997), gies. With recent developments in molecular phylogenetic and given the abundance, ubiquity and biogeochemical methods, comprehensive surveys of microbial diversity and importance of microbes, better integration of microbes into patterns of succession can be documented with unprecedented conceptual models of ecological succession would benefit ease. These methodological improvements coincide with multiple disciplines. An ecological perspective on microbial a growing recognition that the study of microbial succession succession may also provide valuable insight into such applied presents unique opportunities for ecologists to test, and possibly expand, pre-existing conceptual models of ecological * Corresponding author. succession. In addition, research on how specific microbial E-mail address: noah.fi[email protected] (N. Fierer). taxa change in abundance during succession may provide 0923-2508/$ - see front matter Ó 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2010.06.002 Please cite this article in press as: Fierer, N., et al., Changes through time: integrating microorganisms into the study of succession, Research in Microbiology (2010), doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2010.06.002 2 N. Fierer et al. / Research in Microbiology xx (2010) 1e8 Table 1 The three general categories of microbial succession, their distinguishing features, and some specific examples. General succession Distinguishing features Where this type of microbial succession categories is likely to be found Autotrophic Initial colonizers are predominately autotrophs using light Metal and concrete pipes (Okabe et al., 2007) or the oxidation of inorganic compounds to generate energy Little to no organic C initially available Glacial till, volcanic deposits, and other newly-exposed mineral surfaces (Hoppert et al., 2004; Gomez-Alvarez et al., 2007; Nemergut et al., 2007; Schutte et al., 2009) Organic C supply changes relatively slowly over time Aquatic biofilms receiving light (Johnson et al., 1997; Besemer et al., 2007) Endogenous Initial colonizers are predominately heterotrophs, respiring Decomposing wood and litter, compost (Nakasaki et al., Heterotrophic or fermenting organic compounds to generate energy 2005; Danon et al., 2008; Novinscak et al., 2009; Rui et al., 2009) Succession primarily fueled by organic carbon derived Food products including cheese, alcoholic beverages, from the substrate itself cured meats, vinegar, cacao fermentation, etc. (Ercolini et al., 2004; Haruta et al., 2006) Initial community development can be fast Leaf surface (Osono, 2005; Redford and Fierer, 2009) Substrate quality changes over time as succession progresses Skin surface (Fierer et al., 2008a; Costello et al., 2009) and substrate is directly modified by microbes Exogenous Initial colonizers are predominately heterotrophic respirers Sewage and wastewater bioreactors (Santegoeds et al., Heterotrophic or fermenters 1998; van der Gast et al., 2008) Organic carbon supplied by external inputs Teeth (Kolenbrander et al., 2006) Initial community development can be fast Aquatic biofilms forming under reduced light conditions (Martiny et al., 2003) Organic C quality and quantity not directly controlled by the Human gut (Palmer et al., 2007; Balamurugan et al., 2008) microbes and can be highly variable over time This classification scheme is not meant to be all-encompassing. Rather, it is intended to organize the discussion of the successional patterns observed in a wide array of distinct microbial habitats. important clues (perhaps the only clues) to the natural history general operationally-defined categories of microbial succes- and physiology of the majority of taxa that resist laboratory sion, all of which would traditionally be considered forms of cultivation and isolation. primary succession (Table 1). We emphasize that we are Our objective is not to summarize previous research on restricting our discussion to primary succession dynamics, the microbial succession; rather, we discuss how conceptual community changes that occur following the colonization of models developed for plant communities might serve as sterile or nearly sterile environments by microorganisms. We a template for understanding primary succession in microbial will not focus on temporal changes in microbial communities communities and specific processes driving succession that occur following disturbances or changes in environmental patterns. We also show how ecologists can use microorgan- conditions as these are not considered examples of primary isms to broaden the scope of research on succession and how succession unless they lead to the removal of all, or nearly all, studies of ecological succession can help microbiologists microbes in a given environment. better understand community dynamics in both natural and At a basic level, microorganisms can be divided into artificial environments. autotrophs and heterotrophs, with most autotrophs using CO2 as their carbon (C) source and heterotrophs requiring organic 2. Categories of microbial succession C compounds as their C source. Since these physiologies are fundamentally dissimilar and since the two categories of In plant communities, succession is typically divided into organisms may co-occur, but are likely to dominate in very two categories, primary and secondary succession, where distinct types of environments, the initial stages of primary primary succession occurs on an uncolonized substrate and succession could be considered to be divided into categories secondary succession occurs in a previously colonized envi- determined by the source of C for biosynthesis (Table 1). We ronment following a severe disturbance. However, in our further divide heterotrophic succession into exogenous and opinion, these categories are not useful for describing micro- endogenous categories where exogenous succession is fueled bial succession as they are essentially distinguished by the by continuous external inputs of organic C, while the majority presence or absence of soil. Since microbes are not restricted of organic C supplies in endogenous succession are derived to soil and are far more diverse (both phylogenetically and from a single initial input contained within the substrate itself physiologically) than plant communities, we need a different (Table 1). These two categories are also differentiated by the classification scheme to describe microbial succession. degree to which the developing communities modify and Although there are a myriad of ways microbial succession influence the quantity and quality of available C supplies, an patterns could effectively be subdivided and no single classi- effect which is likely to be more pronounced during endoge- fication scheme will apply to all situations, we propose three nous succession than during exogenous succession. During Please cite this article in press as: Fierer, N.,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us