Diversification of the Amazonian Flora and Its Relation to Key Geological

Diversification of the Amazonian Flora and Its Relation to Key Geological

TWENTY-THREE Diversifi cation of the Amazonian fl ora and its relation to key geological and environmental events: a molecular perspective R. Toby Pennington1 and Christopher W. Dick2 1Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, UK 2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Abstract This chapter provides a molecular perspective on Neogene plant diversifi cation in the Amazon drainage basin. The history of Amazon plant diversifi cation must be understood in a broader context of migration of lineages from other continents during the Neogene and earlier periods. The history of major migration events, as revealed by recent molecular systematics research, is reviewed here. These studies demonstrate the role of land bridge migration and oceanic dispersal in forming contemporary Amazon plant diversity. Many of the diversifi cation histories coincide geographically and in timing with the uplift period of the Andean orogeny and, in some cases, with Pleistocene climatic changes. Although the Pleistocene history of Amazon vegetation is poorly understood, population genetics approaches may help to elucidate the occurrence of population contractions and expansions and their relation to putative moist forest refuges during glacial periods. The overlay of ecological traits, such as soil or habitat preference, onto phylogenies highlights the role of habitat specialization in plant diversifi cation across the Amazon drainage basin. This review suggests that collabora- tion between molecular systematists, ecologists, geologists and palaeobotanists will advance future research on the driving factors of Amazon plant diversifi cation. Introduction population genetics, which have generated a substantial change in our perspective of diversifi cation histories. In this chapter we discuss biogeographical hypotheses relevant to Neogene Amazon history. These include (i) the role of Gondwana vicariance and oceanic dispersal in shaping the Paleogene fl ora; Overview of molecular methods (ii) the role of the Isthmus of Panama and Great American Biotic Interchange on Amazonian plant diversity; (iii) the role of the In conjunction with fossils and geographical data, molecular Andean uplift as a source of plant diversity and as a geographic techniques hold great promise for inferring the biogeographical barrier for lowland plant species; (iv) the role of Pleistocene climate histories of populations, clades and communities and, ultimately, change as a driver of speciation; (v) the role of edaphic heterogene- for addressing the question of why there are so many species of ity in adaptive divergence; and (vi) the role of speciation between plants in the Amazon drainage basin. biomes. In reviewing research relevant to understanding the con- This review will draw largely upon inferences from phylogenies, tribution of these diverse processes, our approach emphasizes at or above the species level, derived from DNA sequences. This advances from molecular systematics and, to a smaller degree, fi eld of molecular phylogenetics can be contrasted with that of molecular population genetics, which examines genetic variation of populations. Bridging these two approaches is phylogeography, Amazonia, Landscape and Species Evolution: A Look into the Past, which uses molecular data to examine the geographical history 1st edition. Edited by C. Hoorn and F.P. Wesselingh. of closely related species or geographical lineages. Population © 2010 Blackwell Publishing genetic and phylogeographic studies are poorly developed for HHoorn_ch23_Final.inddoorn_ch23_Final.indd 337373 110/24/20090/24/2009 112:41:452:41:45 SShobhahobha 374 R.T. Pennington & C.W. Dick Amazonian plants. Recent biogeographical inference in molecular Even when multiple fossil calibrations are available, confi dence phylogenetics has frequently used techniques that permit the intervals on dates for individual nodes are seldom narrower inference of absolute time from a phylogenetic tree derived from than one million years, and often as much as fi ve million years, DNA data, but such methods have limitations, which are impor- meaning that it is hard to pinpoint dates with even million-year tant to consider. accuracy. Dating with precision using the ‘borrowed molecu- The two commonly used approaches to inferring divergence lar clocks’ technique is even more diffi cult because substitution times using DNA sequences are (i) fossil-calibrated DNA phyl- rates calculated from other taxa can vary by an order of magni- ogenies, and (ii) ‘borrowed molecular clocks’, which use a range tude, and this variability must be accounted for. However, despite of substitution rates inferred for other taxa. Both approaches their approximate nature, molecular clock methods have been can take account of the fact that nucleotide substitution rates are powerful in choosing between biogeographical scenarios that seldom, if ever, homogeneous or clock-like (Li 1997). are well separated in time. For example, using fossil calibration, In the fi rst approach a date is assigned to a given bifurcation Särkinen et al. (2007) evaluated three biogeographical hypoth- (node) in a phylogeny using fossil evidence that can provide a eses of Gondwana vicariance, boreotropical dispersal and recent minimum age for the common ancestor of a group. Several algo- trans-Atlantic dispersal as explanations for the amphi-Atlantic rithms are available that can allow for variation in substitution distribution of Renealmia (Zingiberaceae). Because they are sepa- rate and date all nodes in a phylogeny using one or more fossil rated by at least 35 million years, the same three biogeographical calibrations (reviewed by Renner 2005; Rutschman 2006). Fossil hypotheses were evaluated as explanations of the amphi-Atlantic calibrations produce misleading results if the fossil records are not disjunction of the kapok tree, Ceiba pentandra, using substitution accurately dated or if they are assigned to the wrong phylogenetic rates from other taxa (Dick et al. 2007). However, in the context node (Graur & Martin 2004). Assignment of fossils to nodes on of this volume, molecular clock techniques, even phylogenies cali- phylogenetic trees requires detailed knowledge of the morpho- brated by multiple fossils, are too approximate for distinguishing logical features of the extant taxa, and where these features have between more closely timed or overlapping events. These include changed in the phylogeny (see Renner 2005), and this information many important geological events of the Neogene associated with is often lacking. Multiple fossils (e.g. Lavin et al. 2005) are desir- Amazonia such as the Andean orogeny and marine incursions able because they provide independent calibrations that can be into the Amazon drainage basin. cross-validated (Near & Sanderson 2004). However, the paucity Resolution of Neogene speciation events is further constrained of Late Cretaceous and Tertiary macrofossils from South America by generally slow rates of nucleotide substitution in plants and Africa means that multiple fossil calibrations will seldom compared with the relatively fast evolving mitochondrial DNA be possible for tropical taxa, and that the age of some large (mtDNA) of animals. The primary source of molecular mark- tropical tree clades may be underestimated simply because their ers for comparative studies in plants, chloroplast DNA (cpDNA), fossils have not been discovered (Heads 2005). Fossil pollen is evolves 10 times more slowly than animal mtDNA (Wolfe et al. more widespread than macrofossils and has been used to infer the 1987). The Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) may be the only age and geographical origin of rainforest tree species (Dick et al. nuclear region that can be easily sequenced across diverse plant 2003, 2007). The utility of fossil pollen, however, varies greatly lineages using universal primers and without the cloning that is among plant groups because its morphology can be uniform necessary to separate the multiple copies of most nuclear loci. The even among some large families. Dates can also be assigned to ITS region has been used for intraspecifi c analyses of divergences nodes using geological events, such as the timing of separation of in the Neogene and older (e.g. Dick et al. 2003). However, the continental land masses or the emergence of oceanic islands ITS region does not show suffi cient variation among species in (e.g. Plana et al. 2004). However, such geological calibrations some important clades of relatively recent origin (e.g. Pliocene- are less preferable than fossils because of the possibility of more Pleistocene), such as the rainforest tree genus Inga (Richardson recent dispersal, which has been repeatedly inferred from fossil- et al. 2001); and the slow rate of substitution in some woody calibrated phylogenies (e.g. Lavin et al. 2004). plant lineages may preclude analysis of Pleistocene divergence ‘Borrowed molecular clocks’ using substitution rates calculated times. Thus the most reliable inferences of divergence times for from other taxa have been applied in the absence of fossils, but Amazonian plants are for relatively old clades. are no more reliable than the rate estimates made in the origi- nal studies. This method assumes that DNA of the study taxon evolves at a rate somewhere between the fastest and slowest Gondwana and boreotropical origins of the published rates of nucleotide substitution for a given genetic Amazonian fl ora region (Richardson et al. 2001; Dick et al. 2003; Kay et al. 2006). Published rates of nucleotide substitution for single regions can

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us