Population Biology of Phoma Betae and Management Strategies for Phoma Leaf Spot of Table Beet in New York

Population Biology of Phoma Betae and Management Strategies for Phoma Leaf Spot of Table Beet in New York

POPULATION BIOLOGY OF PHOMA BETAE AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR PHOMA LEAF SPOT OF TABLE BEET IN NEW YORK A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Lori Blair Koenick May 2019 © 2019 Lori Blair Koenick ABSTRACT Phoma betae, causative agent of seedling, foliar, and root diseases, is an important pathogen of table and sugar beet worldwide. Little is known of the epidemiology and management of diseases caused by P. betae in New York (NY) table beet production systems. This research was conducted to understand the population biology of P. betae in table beet in NY and evaluate management options for the foliar disease caused by P. betae, Phoma leaf spot (PLS). Microsatellite and mating type markers were developed to genotype P. betae populations, and population biology analysis was performed to investigate hypotheses concerning pathogen biology and the role of various inoculum sources in PLS epidemics. High genetic diversity and moderate differentiation was observed among populations, along with evidence for a mixed reproductive mode. Development of these genetic tools will facilitate future studies targeting specific epidemiological questions. Field surveys were conducted in the summers of 2017 and 2018 to estimate prevalence, incidence, and severity of PLS epidemics in conventional and organic NY table beet production systems. PLS was found in 35 of 60 fields with incidence up to 31% in affected fields. The prevalence of PLS in organic table beet fields (74%) was higher than in conventional fields (49%). This research also focused on the potential of cultivar resistance to form part of an integrated management strategy for PLS in organic production. Eight popular table beet cultivars were evaluated for susceptibility to PLS and horticultural characteristics in mist chamber and small plot, replicated trials. Non-red cultivars (Avalanche, Boldor, and Chioggia Guardsmark) were consistently less susceptible to PLS than red cultivars (Falcon, Merlin, Red Ace, Rhonda, and Ruby Queen). Information from this research will be used to strengthen durable management strategies for this disease in NY. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Lori grew up in Potomac, MD and received her high school diploma from Winston Churchill High School in 2012. She continued her education studying Applied and Environmental Microbiology at West Virginia University and graduated with a Bachelor of Science in May 2016. Throughout her undergraduate studies, Lori expanded her interest in microbiology and plant pathology through various classes, student organizations, and working in research labs. In summer 2014, Lori worked as an undergraduate research assistant in a nematology lab studying how to optimize management methods for dagger nematode populations in peach orchards. Throughout 2015 and 2016, Lori worked as an undergraduate research assistant in a forest pathology lab studying the biocontrol potential of various fungal symbionts of hemlock trees and ambrosia beetles. In summer 2016, Lori joined the lab of Dr. Sarah Pethybridge in the Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section of the School of Integrative Plant Science at Cornell University to complete her master’s degree studying the importance of the fungal pathogen, Phoma betae, in NY table beet production. iii Dedicated to my parents who have always given me the support and confidence to pursue happiness. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Sarah Pethybridge, for letting me complete my master’s thesis in her lab, and her continuous support throughout my time at Cornell. I would also like to say a special thank you to my other committee members, Drs. Steve Reiners and Chris Smart, for their warmth and guidance throughout this process. In addition, I would like to thank all the current and past EVADE lab members for providing continuous encouragement and making the lab such a fun place to come into work every day. Thank you to Dr. Noel Knight for your patience in teaching me how to navigate academia. Thank you to Dr. Niloofar Vaghefi and David Strickland for training on numerous techniques. Thank you to Carol Bowden and Sean Murphy for your positivity and training in how to conduct mist chamber and field trials. Thank you to Adrienne Gorny for always having a listening ear available and support throughout this degree. Thank you to Matt Schwarzkopf for excellent summer assistance with mating type marker development. Thank you to Libby Cieniewicz, Larissa Osterbaan, Anna Wallis, Martha Sudermann, and Ali Cala for being incredible office mates and always keeping the sweets bowl full. Special shout outs to Zachary Stansell, Jane Petzoldt, Jenny Wilson, and Katrin Ayer for endless encouragement and affirmation throughout this degree. Thank you to Cornell Cooperative Extension Vegetable Specialists, Amy Ivy, Crystal Stewart, Elizabeth Buck, and Ethan Grunberg, for allowing me to experience table beet production in New York first hand. A special thank you to Vegetable Specialist, Julie Kikkert, who has taught me much about the vegetable processing industry in New York and has been a supportive collaborator throughout this entire degree. Thank you to Dr. Lindsey du Toit for encouraging collaboration and providing isolates of P. betae. This work would not have been possible without funding from the Towards Sustainability Foundation Organic and Sustainability Grants Program, the New York State Vegetable Growers Association and Council, the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Capacity project NYG 2018-19-113 and Hatch project NYG-625-424, and a fellowship from the Cornell Graduate School. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Biographical Sketch .....................................................................................................................iii Dedication ....................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................v List of Figures ..............................................................................................................................vii List of Tables ...............................................................................................................................viii Chapter 1: Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Genetic Diversity and Differentiation in Phoma betae Populations on Table Beet in New York and Washington States .....................................................................................13 Introduction ............................................................................................................................15 Materials and Methods ...........................................................................................................19 Results ....................................................................................................................................28 Discussion ..............................................................................................................................47 References ..............................................................................................................................53 Chapter 3: Phoma Leaf Spot Susceptibility and Horticultural Characteristics of Table Beet Cultivars in New York ...........................................................................................................61 Introduction ............................................................................................................................62 Materials and Methods ...........................................................................................................64 Results ....................................................................................................................................73 Discussion ..............................................................................................................................82 References ..............................................................................................................................87 Chapter 4: Conclusion ................................................................................................................92 Appendix: New York Field Surveys for Phoma Leaf Spot of Table Beet ..................................95 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Phoma leaf spot and Phoma root rot symptoms on table beet ....................................4 Figure 1.2 Disease cycle of Phoma leaf spot in table beet production ........................................6 Figure 2.1 Genotype accumulation curve based on 10 microsatellite markers used on 175 Phoma betae isolates..............................................................................................................29 Figure 2.2 Dot plot representing the number and frequency of multilocus genotypes shared across populations of Phoma betae from New York and Washington States .......................34 Figure 2.3 Dendrograms of the relationships among Phoma betae populations from New York and Washington States ..................................................................................................38 Figure 2.4 Discriminant

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    109 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us