Developing a Chronology for Thinning of the Laurentide Ice Sheet in New Hampshire During the Last Deglaciation

Developing a Chronology for Thinning of the Laurentide Ice Sheet in New Hampshire During the Last Deglaciation

University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Fall 2016 Developing a Chronology for Thinning of the Laurentide Ice Sheet in New Hampshire During the Last Deglaciation Taylor Hodgdon University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Hodgdon, Taylor, "Developing a Chronology for Thinning of the Laurentide Ice Sheet in New Hampshire During the Last Deglaciation" (2016). Master's Theses and Capstones. 873. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/873 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPING A CHRONOLOGY FOR THINNING OF THE LAURENTIDE ICE SHEET IN NEW HAMPSHIRE DURING THE LAST DEGLACIATION by Taylor Hodgdon B.S. Geology, University of New Hampshire, 2014 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Earth Science: Geology September, 2016 This thesis has been examined and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences by: Thesis Director, Joseph M. Licciardi, Associate Professor of Earth Sciences Michael Palace, Associate Professor of Environmental Sciences, Geospatial Analysis and Remote Sensing Thompson Davis, Professor of Natural and Applied Sciences at Bentley University On June 27, 2016 Original approval signatures are on file with the University of New Hampshire Graduate School. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor, Joe Licciardi, who has guided me through the development and competition of this research project. Joe has played an instrumental role in this thesis research, from teaching me proper lab procedures to helping me develop overarching research questions. Joe has helped me become a more critical thinker and grow as a scientist through his unwavering support and encouragement. Without Joe’s support and knowledge this thesis research would not have been possible. I would also like to thank my thesis committee members, Mike Palace and Thom Davis for all of their insight and help interpreting field data. I also appreciate all of the time Mike spent teaching me how to model ice sheets using ArcGIS. Thank you also to my dedicated group of field assistants including: Scott Hodgdon, Grace Delgado, Sarah Widlansky, Sophie White, Jillian Swist, Avy Schweinsberg, Ian Henry, Stephany Gebo, and Julia Dalton. I am grateful to Mike Routhier who spent countless hours teaching me the different functions of ArcGIS and to Nate Hastings and William McKernan who helped me generate figures using Adobe Photoshop. I would also like to thank Susan Zimmerman and Alan Hidy at the Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory who provided assistance with the analysis and calculation of our exposure ages. This research project would not have been possible without generous funding in the form of a graduate assistantship through the Memorial Union Building, a research grant from the University of New Hampshire Department of Earth Sciences, a graduate student research grant from the Geological Society of America, a research grant from the Sigma Xi Scientific Research Society, and a scholarship from Jon Herndon. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………… iii LIST OF TABLES…………………………………………………………………………… vi LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………………….. vii ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………….. viii CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………….………. 1 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW………………………………………………….……….. 1 1.2 GEOLOGIC SETTING…………………………………………………….……... 3 1.3 ICE RETREAT CHRONOLOGY………………………………………….……... 4 1.3.1 VARVE RECORDS ………………………………..………….………. 4 1.3.2 RADIOCARBON DATED LAKE SEDIMENT RECORDS….……….. 6 1.3.3 COSMOGENIC 10BE EXPOSURE AGES…………………….……….. 8 1.4 ICE SHEET THINNING CHRONOLOGY………..………………….………….. 9 1.5 ICE FLOW PATTERNS…………………………………………….……………. 11 II. METHODS……………………….……………………………………………………….. 13 2.1 FIELD WORK……………………………….……………………..…………….. 13 2.2 SAMPLE PREPARATION & ANALYSIS ………………………………………15 2.3 MAPPING STRIATIONS IN ARCGIS …………………………………………. 16 2.4 ICE SHEET PROFILES………………………………………………………….. 17 III. RESULTS………………………………………………………………………………… 19 3.1 COSMOGENIC 10BE EXPOSURE AGES………………………………………..19 3.2 ICE FLOW PATTERNS…………………………………………………………. 24 iv IV. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATIONS……………………………………………… 26 4.1 COMPARISON OF 10BE AGES FROM SAMPLE SUMMITS………………….. 26 4.2 COMPARISON TO PREVIOUSLY REPORTED CHRONOLOGY………........ 28 4.3 ICE FLOW PATTERNS…………………………………………………………... 31 4.4 ICE SHEET PROFILES…………………………………………………………… 31 4.5 ICE SHEET SURFACE MODELS……………………………………………....... 33 4.6 PALEOCLIMATIC INTERPRETATIONS……………………………………….. 35 V. CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………………………………………..... 37 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………………. 38 APPENDIX…………………………………………………………………….………….… 43 v LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 01. 10BE EXPOSURE AGE RESULTS……………………………………………………… 19 02. STRIATION MEASUREMENTS……………………………………………………….. 24 A1. 10BE CALCULATIONS……………………………….………………………………… 44 A2. 14C CALCULATIONS…………………………………………………………………... 45 A3. DATA FOR 10BE CALCULATIONS………………………………………………….... 46 vi LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 01. LAURENTIDE ICE SHEET EXTENT……………………….…………………………. 2 02. NORTH AMERICAN VARVE CHRONOLOGY……………….……………………… 5 03. ICE RETREAT RATE…………………………………………………….……………... 6 04. LAKE SEDIMENT CORE 14C AGES………………………………….………………... 7 05. KATAHDIN TRANSECT……………………………………………………………..... 10 06. 10BE FIELD SAMPLING SITES………………………………………………………... 14 07. ICE SHEET THINNING SCHEMATIC………………………………………………... 18 08a-d. 10BE AND STRIATION RESULTS…………………………………………………. 20 09. HIGHEST AND LOWEST STRIATIONS……………………………………………… 25 10. STRIATION DISTRIBUTIONS………………………………………………………… 25 11. 10BE AGES WITH 14C CHRONOLOGY……………………………………………...... 29 12. ICE SHEET PROFILES…………………………………………………………………. 32 13. MODELED ICE SHEET SURFACES…………………………………………………... 35 vii ABSTRACT DEVELOPING A CHRONOLOGY FOR THINNING OF THE LAURENTIDE ICE SHEET IN NEW HAMPSHIRE DURING THE LAST DEGLACIATION by Taylor Hodgdon University of New Hampshire, September 2016 Well-constrained ages for the retreat of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) have been developed at key sites throughout New England, providing a framework for the deglacial history of the region. Previous work has focused primarily on documenting retreat of the ice sheet margin, but few studies have attempted to reconstruct changes in ice sheet geometry and flow patterns during its recession. This study provides the first direct age control on the thinning of the LIS in central and southern New Hampshire during the last deglaciation. In situ cosmogenic 10Be exposure ages were developed from four glaciated summits, in order to determine when each mountain top emerged from the ice as it thinned. Exposure ages indicate the southernmost summit in the study (Mt. Monadnock) was exposed at 15.4 ± 0.2 ka, and the northernmost peak (Mt. Dickey) was exposed at 13.1 ± 0.2 ka. This age range supports a period of rapid ice surface lowering in New England. Striation measurements collected both from this study and previously published literature were analyzed to observe how ice flow patterns evolved in this region. The striations at the lowest elevations display a wider azimuthal range than those found at the highest viii elevations, indicating the development of strong topographic control on ice flow as thinning occurred. Three-dimensional ice sheet surfaces were modeled to display changes in ice sheet geometry, and suggest an increased rate of thinning from 1 m/yr to 2 m/yr at ~15 ka coinciding with the start of the Bølling Allerød warm period. This study provides valuable new insight on LIS thinning and flow patterns in New Hampshire and suggests potential links between changes in ice sheet geometry and regional paleoclimate forcings. ix Chapter I: Introduction 1.1: Project Overview New England has long been the focus of glacial-geologic studies due to the abundance of glacial features covering the landscape. Agassiz (1870) was one of the first to provide evidence that glaciers once occupied the White Mountains. Early hypotheses stated that this region was dominated solely by alpine glaciers due to lack of “grooved patterns” outside of the White Mountains (Jackson, 1844). The hypothesis for a continental ice sheet in New Hampshire was not proposed until many years later and was not widely accepted until the work of Goldthwait (1916). The Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) reached its maximum extent (Fig. 1) in New England 26.1 ka (Balco et al., 2002; Balco et al, 2009) at the onset of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) between 26.5 and 20 ka (Clark et al., 2009). The chronology of ice recession in New England since the LGM is based primarily on basal 14C ages from modern lacustrine environments and varve records in proglacial lake sediments (Thompson et al., 1999; Ridge and Toll, 1999). These records indicate rapid retreat, roughly 300 m/yr, of the LIS margin across New Hampshire during the last deglaciation (Ridge et al., 2012). However, the radiocarbon and varve-based records rely on indirect dating of ice margin positions and do not provide any detail on ice sheet surface geometry. Recent studies

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    56 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us