Light Dark Matter through Resonance Scanning Djuna Croon,1, ∗ Gilly Elor,2, y Rachel Houtz,3, z Hitoshi Murayama,4, 5, 6, x and Graham White6, { 1TRIUMF Theory Group, 4004 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, B.C. V6T2A3, Canada 2Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 3Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, U.K. 4Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5Theory Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 6Kavli IPMU (WPI), UTIAS, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan We propose a new out-of-equilibrium production mechanism of light dark matter: resonance scanning. If the dark matter mass evolved in the early Universe, resonant production may have occurred for a wide range of light dark matter masses today. We show that the dark matter relic abundance may be produced through the Higgs portal, in a manner consistent with current experimental constraints. I. INTRODUCTION A specific example of the resonance scanning mech- anism is given by a non-minimally coupled morphon Light dark matter has become a focus of the next gen- field. The evolution of the scalar curvature, in particular eration of direct-detection experiments [1{8]. However, through the anomalous breaking of scale invariance near unlike for the popular weakly interacting massive parti- the QCD scale, gives the morphon a varying potential cles (WIMP), thermal production of sub-GeV dark mat- and the dark matter a falling mass. We will demonstrate ter requires a cross section in tension with existing cos- the success of this scenario in detail. mological constraints. As such, production mechanisms Dark matter with a dynamical mass has previously for dark matter in this mass range are limited [9{11]. been considered as a way to open/close new produc- In this work we propose a new mechanism for the pro- tion channels [37{40], dynamincally trigger freezeout [41], duction of light dark matter, through a Higgs portal. The raise the dark matter mass observed today to explain an mechanism is based on the hypothesis that the dark mat- anomaly [42], make use of an exotic confinement transi- ter mass was not constant in the early Universe, but in- tion [43] or make dark matter heavier than is normally stead depends on the vacuum expectation value (VEV) of allowed by perturbativity [44]. This work complements an ultralight scalar, the morphon. As the Universe cools, these existing proposals by decoupling the dark matter the temperature-dependent morphon VEV implies a de- mass today from the dark matter mass through which creasing dark matter mass. The scanning dark matter the yield was set, allowing a range of masses to benefit from resonantly enhanced production. mass will generically pass through mχ ≈ mh=2, imply- ing resonant enhancement of Higgs portal production. In this way, light dark matter can be produced through a smaller portal coupling λhDM than in the standard case. II. RESONANT PRODUCTION The dark matter only obtains its final sub-GeV mass af- ter losing contact with the thermal bath. Let us first review some key principles of resonant pro- The mechanism opens up the parameter space of ex- duction in Higgs portal models. Throughout this work, isting Higgs portal dark matter models [12{16]. The pa- we assume the dark matter is a Dirac fermion, below the rameter space of the standard Higgs portal WIMP sce- weak scale defined by nario has been encroached on by direct detection and collider experiments [17{36]. In fact, the only remain- µ 1 Lχ =χγ ¯ @µχ − mχχχ¯ − λhχhχχ¯ ; (1) arXiv:2012.15284v1 [hep-ph] 30 Dec 2020 ing allowed parameter space corresponds to the special 2 case that the dark matter mass is near half of the Higgs mass, such that its interactions with the SM through the where mχ ∼ MeV is the T = 0 mass of the dark matter Higgs portal are resonantly enhanced. The mechanism fermion. The last operator in Lχ { the portal coupling to presented here implies that this enhancement is not co- the SM Higgs field { breaks SU(2)L and therefore λhχ / incidental, but a generic stage in the thermal evolution v=Λ (where Λ is a new physics scale) may be small. of Higgs portal dark matter. In standard thermal freeze-out, the portal coupling controls how much dark matter annihilates before it de- couples, and therefore sets the relic abundance. Alterna- tively, in freeze-in scenarios the portal coupling controls ∗ [email protected] the production of dark matter though the same diagram. y [email protected] The dark matter annihilation into SM final states pro- z [email protected] ceeds through a Higgs boson in the s-channel. When x [email protected], [email protected] the dark matter mass is in the region mχ ' mh=2, the { [email protected] annihilation cross section is resonantly enhanced. µ Direct detection experiments [35, 36] and current lim- trace of the stress-energy tensor Tµ , such that it is non- its on invisible Higgs decays [45] only allow for small por- vanishing due to the anomalous breaking of scale invari- µ tal couplings λhχ. On the other hand, the annihilation ance (the trace anomaly, Tµ 6= 0). The effects that break cross section must be large enough that freeze-out repro- scale invariance during the relevant period of the mor- duces the correct relic abundance. In order to simulta- phon's phase transition are the perturbative running of neously achieve relic abundance and avoid direct detec- couplings, mass thresholds, and QCD confinement. tion bounds, the dark matter must annihilate through Estimating the size of R from the running of the cou- the Higgs mediator on resonance. The enhanced annihi- plings only, we find R=H2 ∼ 10−2{10−1 for T ∼ GeV, lation cross section allows for comparatively small Higgs with a quick increase near QCD confinement where the portal couplings. This effect can be seen in the line of perturbative analysis breaks down [49]. The full anal- the relic abundance curve for Higgs portal models, repro- ysis, including a careful treatment of confinement and duced here as the dark blue curve in Fig. 3. The reso- deviations from scale invariance due to mass thresholds, nance peak appears instead as a valley on this plot, and has been done in [50]. In our calculation, we will use the relic abundance curve dips into small enough cou- their result for the evolution of the Ricci scalar between p plings to avoid Xenon1T bounds just as mχ approaches T ∼ 100 MeV and T ∼ 10 GeV. This is plotted as R(T ) mh=2, highlighted by the dotted vertical line. in Fig. 1. At high temperatures the morphon develops a nonzero VEV: III. DARK MATTER MASS MORPHING 8 r <> 1 ξR − m2 ; ξR > m2 λφ φ φ Here we will consider coupling the dark matter to a vφ(T ) = (5) pseudoscalar morphon field φ, :> 0 otherwise : L = LSM + Lχ − iyφχφχγ¯ 5χ − V (φ) (2) In this way, the morphon VEV decreases with decreasing T , until it vanishes at low temperatures. The dark matter We will study the scenario in which the morphon poten- loses the extra contributions to its mass from interactions tial V (φ) implies a temperature dependent evolution of with the morphon, realizing its final light mass. The red the morphon vacuum expectation value vφ(T ), such that solid line of Fig. 1 shows the temperature evolution of the the morphon field contributes a temperature dependent dark matter mass for a sample benchmark point. The piece to the effective dark matter mass, dark matter mass triggers the resonance when it is equal 2 2 2 2 to half of the Higgs mass, mχ(Tres) = mh=2. mχ(T ) = [mχ,0 + λhχvh] + yφχvφ(T ) (3) where the terms within brackets indicate the zero tem- IV. CONSISTENT THERMAL AVERAGING perature mass which we will simply refer to as mχ. Resonance scanning relies on the evolution of the mor- phon field φ from a nonzero field value (v (T ) > 0) to In order to study the production of dark matter in φ this scenario, we will solve a Boltzmann equation of the a zero field value (vφ(T ) = 0) at low temperatures. If 1 the shift in dark matter mass is significant, the mor- form, phon potential has to be relatively flat, if it is not to dn + 3Hn = − n2 − n2 hσ vi (6) contribute significantly to the vacuum energy at early dt eq χχ¯ times. It would therefore be natural to consider scenarios in which the morphon field is a pseudo-Goldstone boson, The simple form of this equation relies on thermally in which case (3) can be considered an expansion around averaging the dark matter annihilation cross section, a the minimum of the potential. procedure based on the momentum distribution func- As a proof of concept, we consider a scenario in which tions for the dark matter particles. If the mass changes the morphon field is coupled to the Ricci-scalar, more rapidly than the rates establishing kinetic equi- librium, the distribution functions are no longer well- 1 1 1 defined. Therefore, we introduce three conditions to en- V (φ) = m2 φ2 − ξRφ2 + λ φ4 ; (4) 2 φ 2 4 φ sure the formalism is appropriate, where we choose ξ = 1=6, motivated by conformal in- variance [46, 47]. Such a coupling has earlier been stud- 1 ied in [48, 49]. The temperature evolution of the Ricci Typically the decay rate ΓH!χχ dominates for mχ mh. How- scalar generates a temperature-dependent mass term in ever, for resonance scanning dark matter this decay channel only the potential.