A new public transit network for the East end of Montréal Information session REM DE L'EST | MAY 2021 Filiale de la Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec | cdpqinfra.com Ce document constitue de l’information privilégiée et confidentielle, et ne peut être transmis ou communiqué sans le consentement préalable de la Caisse. Agenda 1 The CDPQ Infra model 2 Analysis and reference project PHASE 1 - Mobility analysis PHASE 2 - Multi-criteria analysis of preliminary scenarios PHASE 3 - Analysis of the stakes Proposed solution 3 Integration 4 The next steps The CDPQ Infra Model An innovative model unveiled in 2015 Green light given by The government the government identified mobility STEP 1 needs CDPQ Infra is Design a reference one of the few project organizations in the world with the financial capacity and technical expertise required to carry out public STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 Consultation and Planning and Development and Operation transit communication financing execution infrastructure projects. Public interest project Analysis and Reference Project Input considered in selecting the solution Analyses and reference project | 5 PRELIMINARY PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 RESULT PHASE Mobility analysis Multi-criteria Analysis of the Reference Territory analysis of stakes project proposal diagnosis preliminary scenarios Identification Identification Identification of mobility of potential of reference needs routes solution The data analysis and the choice of the solution are studied with our partners. PHASE 1 Mobility analysis Objective: Identification of mobility needs Strategic areas to service du Ruisseau-De Montigny nature Park Cégep Marie-Victorin PDUES Sherbrooke Street Frédéric-Back Park Pointe-de-l'île industrial sector De la Pointe-aux-Prairies nature Park De la Pointe-de-l’Île Sector Santa-Cabrini Institut universitaire Institut de Cardiologie Hospital en santé mentale de Montréal Maisonneuve- Vieux Rosemont Du Vieux-Moulin Park Hospital Pointe-aux-Trembles Maisonneuve Park De l’hôtel-de-ville park Olympic Stadium sector Bellerive Park Mont-Royal. Park Lafontaine Park Longue-Pointe Hospitals Assomption-Sud Sector Sector Employment districts McGill University UQAM Assomption Sud Downtown – Longue-Pointe Green spaces Industrial- port areas CHUM Knowledge districts Notre-Dame East Des corridor Strategic sectors identified by the City of Montréal Faubourgs Principles for promoting use of public transit Connexion to downtown maximize ridership and use of the service Direct Frequency and access reliability limit overloading emphasize the dedicated corridor and agile High-performance technology anD efficient service Fluidity and Universal interconnectivity accessibility simple and sufficient space for service quick access accessible to everyone PHASE 2 Multi-criteria analysis of preliminary scenarios Objective: Identification of potential routes Strategic hubs Sherbrooke Dame - Notre Highway 25 Langelier Lacordaire Saint-Michel Papineau Travel corridors studied Ridership – preliminary studies Combo 1 Reference Lacordaire + Pointe-aux-Trembles project Combo 2 Papineau + Pointe-aux-Trembles Papineau / Boul. Industriel Papineau St-Joseph / Papineau / Bourassa North-east Lacordaire Langelier Aut. 25 Tram – break Honoré-Beaugrand Tram - Notre-Dame/Pointe-aux-Trembles East Sherbrooke/End of Island Pointe-aux-Trembles BOARDING / MORNING PEAK 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 Multi-criteria analysis of preliminary scenarios and analysis of the stakes Social Attractiveness acceptability Technical BalanCe Environmental capacity to be founD impacts Financial Network balance impacts PHASE 3 Analysis of the stakes Objective: Identification of the mode and the type of insertion Tramway 4 times less ridership than light rail Non-competitive travel time: Frequency of passage: Major limitation to ridership Not very flexible 20 km/h 3.5 to 4 minutes capacity: to changing needs insufficient to meet demand Tram-train 4 times less ridership than light rail metro Average travel time, Frequency of passage Ridership: insufficient Not very flexible depending on type of route equivalent to the tramway to meet demand to changing needs when at ground level 3.5 to 4 minutes Light rail metro Competitive travel time: Frequency of passage: Ridership: sufficient Flexible evolution 40-45 km/h up to every 90 seconds to meet demand over time RESULT Reference project Objective: Maximize the satisfaction of all the criteria analyzed REM de l’Est reference route Montréal-Nord 7 days/week Cégep Marie-Victorin $10 B Couture Schedule synchronized with the total estimated Montréal metro project cost Pointe-Aux-Trembles Saint-Léonard Rousselière Tricentenaire 2 to 4 min. Lacordaire Saint-Jean-Baptiste 32 km frequency during Saint-Zotique rush hours of dedicated tracks: Contrecoeur Hôpital 8 km underground and 24 km elevated Maisonneuve-Rosemont Honoré-Beaugrand 100% Assomption Haig stations electric and automated 23 Saint -Clément universally accessible Pie Viauville Davidson-IX Sud Saint Dufresne -UrbainLabelle Cartier Robert-Bourassa Stations Aerial track Potential station Scenic river views Underground route Intermodal stations Solution identified Montréal-Nord Cégep Marie-Victorin Couture Pointe-Aux-Trembles Saint-Léonard Rousselière Tricentenaire Lacordaire Saint-Jean-Baptiste Saint-Zotique Contrecoeur Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont Honoré- Beaugrand Assomption Stations Haig Potential station Saint Pie -Clément Elevated route along -IX Sud Viauville Intermodal stations Davidson Underground route the north side of the Saint Dufresne street REM -UrbainLabelle Cartier Montréal metro Exo trains Robert-Bourassa Elevated route variable Elevated route down the according to sector centre of the street Pie-IX BRT A network integrated with other modes Intermodal Connections • Mascouche line • Green, blue and orange lines • Pie-IX BRT • REM • STM, STL, RTL and exo bus networks Importance of offering an attractive solution TARGETED OBJECTIVES WITH THE REM DE L’EST % time savings Current situation with the REM de l'Est compared to the current situation Pointe-aux-Trembles ↔ downtown 45 to 60 minutes 25 min 45 to 60% Pointe-aux-Trembles ↔ 55 minutes Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital 35 min 35% Pointe-aux-Trembles ↔ Port of Montréal 55 to 70 minutes 30 min 45 to 60% Pointe-aux-Trembles ↔ Les Faubourgs 65 minutes 30 min 55% Mercier-Est ↔ Université de Montréal 35 to 55 minutes 30 min 15 to 45% Cégep Marie-Victorin ↔ downtown 55 to 70 minutes 30 min 45 to 60% Mobility benefits • Reduces traffic congestion associated with BY 2044 “solo cars” • Doubles the coverage of the metro 133,000 network in Montréal East (x 2.5) users per day • Services destinations other than just downtown 380 million • Offers frequent and reliable service passenger-km per year 165million vehicle-km Environment benefits • Encourages moDal transfer from “solo car” to public transit IN OPERATION • Acts as an important vector for rehabilitating ContaminateD brownfields in the East end of Montréal • Contributes to improving the overall environmental balanCe 35,000 of the East end of Montréal tons of GHG prevented per year • Includes a GHG offset strategy during the construction phase Economy benefits • Serves the industrial parKs, including the Port of Montréal and DURING the reCreational anD CONSTRUCTION tourist area of the Olympic district • Leverages development in the industrial sectors of Pointe-de- l'Île and + 6.3 B $ L'Assomption Sud – Longue-Pointe contributed to Québec’s GDP • Contributes to revitalizing the CommerCial arteries • Improves workforce reCruitment anD retention + 60,000 • Services 27 million square feet of vacant lanD conducive to direct and indirect jobs redevelopment Integration Distinguishing Montreal Design of elevated structures and A design that adapts to the stations with a modern and identifying characteristics symbolic signature for Montreal, of each segment. similar to other large metropolises around the world Multidisciplinary expert committee Maud Cohen, Ken Paula Christian Committee Chair, Negron, President and Greenberg, Savard, Ph.D., Associate Executive Director, urban designer, Executive Director, Professor, Université CHU Sainte-Justine professor, author Vivre en ville Foundation de Montréal Christian Stéphanie Jean-Paul Trudeau, Éric Yaccarini, President and CEO, Viguier, Executive Vice Gauthier, Société Architect, President and President, Québec Architect, FABG développement Founder of VIGUIER at Énergir Angus Luc Gagnon, Rose Mouna Éric Director of the Lyndsay Service de Andraos, Millette, Architectural Conservation l’urbanisme et de la Daudier, Co-founder of Daily and Integration Consultant, mobilité, Ville de Executive Director, tous les jours Montréal Fusion jeunesse CONTEXTURE Marie Elaine Monique Frédérick Farley, Bouthillette, Simard, President and Chief Assistant Deputy Minister for Strategic Producer and cultural Executive Officer, Public Transit and Rail Projects, manager Chambre de la Ministère des Transports sécurité financière Multidisciplinary expert committee Upstream development Vision Mandate of guidelines through a concerted approach, led Inspired by best practices Participate in developing the around the world, ensure the architectural design guidelines by experts, design and architecture of the that will be imposed on the for the architectural, REM de l'Est integrates consortiums during the request urban and landscape seamlessly with its for proposals process. surroundings integration of the Provide recommendations to the network.