Ultrathin metallic coatings can induce quantum levitation between nanosurfaces Mathias Bostrom, Barry W. Ninham, Iver Brevik, Clas Persson, Drew F. Parsons and Bo Sernelius Linköping University Post Print N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original article. Original Publication: Mathias Bostrom, Barry W. Ninham, Iver Brevik, Clas Persson, Drew F. Parsons and Bo Sernelius, Ultrathin metallic coatings can induce quantum levitation between nanosurfaces, 2012, Applied Physics Letters, (100), 25, 253104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4729822 Copyright: American Institute of Physics (AIP) http://www.aip.org/ Postprint available at: Linköping University Electronic Press http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-79698 Ultrathin Metallic Coatings Can Induce Quantum Levitation between Nanosurfaces Mathias Boström,1,2, a) Barry W. Ninham,2 Iver Brevik,1 Clas Persson,3, 4 Drew F. Parsons,2 and Bo E. Sernelius5, b) 1)Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway 2)Department of Applied Mathematics, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 3)Dept of Materials Science and Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden 4)Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P. Box 1048 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway 5)Division of Theory and Modeling, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden There is an attractive Casimir-Lifshitz force between two silica surfaces in a liquid (bromobenze or toluene). We demonstrate that adding an ultrathin (5-50Å) metallic nanocoating to one of the surfaces results in repulsive Casimir-Lifshitz forces above a critical separation. The onset of such quantum levitation comes at decreasing separations as the film thickness decreases. Remarkably the effect of retardation can turn attraction into repulsion. From that we explain how an ultrathin metallic coating may prevent nanoelectromechanical systems from crashing together. PACS numbers: 42.50.Lc, 34.20.Cf, 03.70.+k At close distances particles experience a Casimir- Lifshitz force (van der Waals force). 1–8 This takes a SiO2 Toluene SiO2 weaker (retarded) form with increasing separation. 2,3 We show how addition of ultrathin nanocoatings to in- teracting surfaces can change the forces from attractive to repulsive. This can be done by exploiting dielectric b properties to shift the retarded regime down to a few nanometers. The addition of very thin coatings may also give repulsive van der Waals interactions (non-retarded Gold Casimir-Lifshitz interactions) in asymmetric situations. While these curious effects were in principle known 40 d years ago 4,8,9 they have not been explored in detail. Nan- otechnological advances now allow their exploitation. In this letter the focus is on the interaction between Figure 1. Model system where repulsive Casimir-Lifshitz in- gold coated silica and silica across toluene. For thick teraction can be induced between silica surfaces in toluene coating there is a retardation driven repulsion that sets when one surface has an ultrathin gold nanocoating. in at 11 Å while for thin coating there can also be repul- sion in the case when retardation is neglected. There are in the case of one surface with thin gold coating repulsive. It becomes repulsive for separations above a and one bare surface not only a retardation driven re- critical distance. 10 This distance, which we will refer to 10 pulsion but also an effect due to the system being an as the levitation distance, decreases with decreasing film 4 asymmetric multilayer system. A schematic illustration thickness. At large separation the interaction is repulsive; of the system is shown in Fig. 1. Leaving one surface when separation decreases the repulsion increases, has a bare and treating one surface with an ultrathin metallic maximum, decreases and becomes zero at the levitation nanocoatings so provides a way to induce what might be distance; for even smaller separation the interaction is termed quantum levitation, i.e reduced friction between attractive. The repulsion maximum increases with de- equal surfaces in a liquid. The Casimir-Lifshitz energy creasing gold-film thickness. depends in a very sensitive way on differences between We study two silica (SiO ) 11 surfaces in different dielectric functions. When a 5-50 Å ultrathin gold coat- 2 liquids [bromobenzene (Bb) with data from Munday ing is added to one of the silica surfaces the force becomes et al., 12 bromobenzene with data from van Zwol and Palasantzas, 13 and toluene 13]. To enable calculation of Casimir-Lifshitz energies a detailed knowledge of the di- a)Electronic mail: [email protected] electric functions is required. 3,4 Examples of such func- b)Electronic mail: [email protected] tions are shown in Fig. 2. As noted by Munday et al.12 2 10 of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), as well as SiO its further extension NEMS (nanoelectromechanical sys- !(0) 2 Bb;M tems). The demonstration of the first MEMS in the mid- Bb Au dle 1980’s generated a large interest in the engineering SiO Bb;Z community, but the practical usefulness of the technol- 2 Toluene ogy has been much less than what was anticipated at its ) Toluene " inception. One of the key barriers to commercial success (i 17,18 ! has been the problem of stiction. Stiction is the ten- dency of small devices to stick together, and occurs when surface adhesion forces are stronger than the mechanical restoring force of the microstructure. The application of 1 thin surface layers has turned out to be a possibility to reduce or overcome the problem. In particular, as dis- 1014 1015 1016 1017 cussed in this letter, if the use of thin metallic layers " (rad/s) creates an over-all repulsion between closely spaced sur- faces in practical cases, this will be quite an attractive Figure 2. The dielectric function at imaginary frequencies option. Serry et al. have given careful discussions of the 11 12,13 5 for SiO2 (silica) , Bb (bromobenzene) , Au (gold) , and relationship between the Casimir effect and stiction in 13 Toluene. The static values have been displayed at the left connection with MEMS. 17,18 The reader may also con- vertical axis. sult the extensive and general review article of Bushan. 19 The field of measurements of quantum induced forces due to vacuum fluctuations was pioneered long ago by the fact that there is a crossing between the curves for Deryaguin and Abrikossova. 20 Lamoreaux 21 performed SiO and Bb opens up for the possibility of a transition 2 the first high accuracy measurement of Casimir forces of the Casimir-Lifshitz energy, from attraction to repul- between metal surfaces in vacuum that apparently con- sion. A similar effect was seen earlier in another very sub- firmed predictions for both the Casimir asymptote and tle experiment performed by Hauxwell and Ottewill. 14 the classical asymptote. 22,23 The first measurements of They measured the thickness of oil films on water near Casimir-Lifshitz forces directly applied to MEMS were the alkane saturated vapor pressure. For this system n- performed by Chan et al. 24,25 and somewhat later by alkanes up to octane spread on water. Higher alkanes Decca et al.. 26 A key aspect of the Casimir-Lifshitz force do not spread. It was an asymmetric system (oil-water- is that according to theory it can be either attractive air) and the surfaces were molecularly smooth. The phe- or repulsive. 3,15,27 Casimir-Lifshitz repulsion was mea- nomenon depends on a balance of van der Waals forces sured for films of liquid helium (10-200 Å) on smooth sur- against the vapor pressure. 14–16 faces. 28 The agreement found from theoretical analysis of First we consider the model dielectric function for bro- these experiments meant a great triumph for the Lifshitz mobenzene from Munday et al. 12 also used in Ref. 10. theory. 4,14,16,27 Munday, Capasso, and Parsegian 12 car- This leads to the conclusion that retardation effects turn ried out direct force measurements showing that Casimir- attraction into repulsion at the levitation distance. How- Lifshitz forces could be repulsive. They found attrac- ever, when we use the correct form for the dielectric func- tive Casimir-Lifshitz forces between gold surfaces in bro- tion of bromobenzene from van Zwol and Palasantzas 13 mobenzene. When one surface was replaced with silica the Casimir-Lifshitz force is repulsive also in the non- the force turned repulsive. It was recently shown that retarded limit! We will finally consider Casimir-Lifshitz the repulsion may be a direct consequence of retarda- interactions in toluene. This system provides us with tion. 10,29 Only a few force measurements of repulsive an example where retardation turns attraction into re- Casimir-Lifshitz forces have been reported in the liter- pulsion for levitation distances of less than 11 Å. This is ature. 12,13,30–32 apparently counterintuitive as retardation effects are usu- Now to the actual calculations and numerical results. ally assumed to set in at much larger separations! This is One way to find retarded van der Waals or Casimir- the case when the two interacting objects are immersed Lifshitz interactions is in terms of the electromagnetic in vacuum. If they are immersed in a liquid or gas differ- normal modes5 of the system. For planar structures the ent frequency regions may give attractive and repulsive interaction energy per unit area can be written as contributions. The net result depends on the competition ∞ between these attractive and repulsive contributions. It 2 is obviously very important to have reliable data for the ~ d k dω E = 2 ln [fk (iω)] , (1) dielectric functions of the objects and ambient. Z (2π) Z 2π 0 Quantum levitation from the Casimir effect modulated by thin conducting films may be a way to prevent surfaces where fk (ωk)=0 is the condition for electromagnetic used in quantum mechanical systems to come together by normal modes.