A Simple Mixing Explanation for Late Pleistocene Changes in the Pacific-South Atlantic Benthic Δ13c Gradient

A Simple Mixing Explanation for Late Pleistocene Changes in the Pacific-South Atlantic Benthic Δ13c Gradient

Clim. Past, 6, 305–314, 2010 www.clim-past.net/6/305/2010/ Climate doi:10.5194/cp-6-305-2010 of the Past © Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License. A simple mixing explanation for late Pleistocene changes in the Pacific-South Atlantic benthic δ13C gradient L. E. Lisiecki Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA Received: 30 November 2009 – Published in Clim. Past Discuss.: 23 December 2009 Revised: 1 April 2010 – Accepted: 27 April 2010 – Published: 7 May 2010 Abstract. The fact that the deep-ocean benthic δ13C min- the North Atlantic and Southern Ocean mix in approximately imum shifted from the North Pacific to the South Atlantic equal proportions to form Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) during the Last Glacial Maximum is often interpretted as ev- (Broecker et al., 1998), which flows northward into the South idence of a change in deep water circulation, such as the de- Pacific at depth and returns southward at mid-depths in the velopment of deep water ventilation in the North Pacific or form of Pacific Deep Water (PDW) (Ganachaud et al., 2003; a decrease in Southern Ocean overturning. This study re- Talley et al., 2003). Because southward flowing PDW pro- evaluates the implications of changes in benthic δ13C gra- gressively mixes with younger water during its return trip, to- dients by comparing Pacific Deep Water (PDW) δ13C mea- day the oldest deep water with the most negative δ13C value surements with the values expected for the null hypothesis is found at mid-depth in the North Pacific (Kroopnick, 1985; that PDW ventilation sources remained unchanged through- Matsumoto et al., 2002). out the Late Pleistocene. The δ13C compositions of PDW, However, at the LGM the most negative benthic δ13C mea- Northern Component Water (NCW) and Southern Compo- surements are found in the deep South Atlantic. Does this nent Water (SCW) are estimated from regional benthic δ13C shift imply that at the LGM Pacific deep water was younger stacks of 3–6 sites. Changes in PDW δ13C and PDW-SCW than South Atlantic deep water? Previous studies have sug- δ13C gradients over the past 800 kyr are found to be well de- gested that the change in benthic δ13C gradients was caused scribed by a constant mixture of 60% NCW and 40% SCW by additional mixing between PDW and North Pacific Inter- plus a constant Pacific remineralization offset of −0.5‰. mediate Water (NPIW) (Duplessy et al., 1988; Herguera et Thus, a change in PDW ventilation cannot be inferred solely al., 1992; Keigwin, 1998; Oppo and Horowitz, 2000). Al- on the basis of changes in the Pacific-South Atlantic benthic ternatively, North Atlantic water may have been the primary δ13C gradient. ventilation source for the deep Pacific with intermediate wa- ter providing only a weak, secondary ventilation source (Tog- gweiler et al., 2006). In this study a simple mixing model is 13 1 Introduction used to test the null hypothesis that PDW δ C values re- sult from a constant mixing ratio of water from the North An important unanswered question about glacial ocean circu- and South Atlantic throughout the Late Pleistocene. This 13 lation is whether the shift of minimum δ13C values from the model reproduces most of the changes in PDW δ C, in- 13 North Pacific to the South Atlantic at the Last Glacial Max- cluding glacial reversals of the Pacific-South Atlantic δ C imum (LGM) implies a major change in Pacific circulation. gradient. 13 Benthic δ13C values are often used as a proxy for deep water Section 2 reviews the causes of δ C variability and de- 13 ventilation because deep water δ13C becomes progressively scribes δ C gradients in the ocean today and at the LGM. 13 more negative with age due to the accumulation of remineral- Section 3 estimates the δ C values of PDW, Northern ized low-δ13C organic carbon. Today deep waters formed in Component Water (NCW) and Southern Component Water (SCW) for the last 800 kyr using regional δ13C stacks. Sec- tion 4 compares PDW δ13C with the results of a simple mix- Correspondence to: L. E. Lisiecki ing model based on the assumption that PDW is composed ([email protected]) of a constant proportion of NCW and SCW with a constant Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 306 L. E. Lisiecki: A simple explanation of PDW-SCW δ13C gradient changes remineralization offset. Section 5 discusses model and data Because water mass properties and formation processes limitations and the implications of the model results, includ- differ between glacials and interglacials, I use the gen- ing alternative interpretations. Finally, Sect. 6 summarizes eral term Northern Component Water (NCW) to describe my conclusions. intermediate/deep water formed in the North Atlantic and the term Southern Component Water (SCW) to describe deep/bottom water formed in the Southern Ocean. LGM NCW, often called Glacial North Atlantic Intermediate Wa- 2 Background ter (GNAIW), shoals to 2000 m and has higher δ13C values than NCW today (Oppo and Lehman, 1993). Large changes 13 Modern δ C gradients are explained by differences in wa- in Atlantic δ13C values below 2000 m result from changes in ter masses’ age and surface water processes (biological pro- the mixing ratio of NCW and SCW (i.e., more SCW during ductivity and air-sea gas exchange). Here, age is defined glacials) and the δ13C values of the two water masses (Curry as the length of time since water last had contact with the and Oppo, 2005). 13 surface ocean. As C-depleted organic carbon sinks below The δ13C value of SCW may have been as low as −0.9‰ the thermocline and remineralizes at depth, it increases the at the LGM (Ninnemann and Charles, 2002; Curry and 13 13 δ C of surface water and decreases the δ C of deep wa- Oppo, 2005). Repeated δ13C measurements of LGM benthic 13 ter. The flux of low-δ C organic carbon from the surface foraminifera from different locations throughout the South to deep ocean produces a remineralization (or “aging”) off- Atlantic are all consistent with a low-δ13C glacial SCW end- set because the longer that deep water remains out of contact member, indicating that these values are not an artifact of the 13 with the surface, the more negative its δ C value becomes. phytodetrital effect (Ninnemann and Charles, 2002; Curry Another important source of carbon isotope fractionation is and Oppo, 2005). The large change in SCW δ13C is con- temperature-dependent air-sea gas exchange (e.g., Mook et sidered evidence for glacial reductions in air-sea exchange al., 1974; Charles et al., 1993; Lynch-Stieglitz et al., 1995), and overturning rates around Antarctica (e.g., Marchitto and 13 which tends to decrease the δ C of warm surface water and Broecker, 2006; Bouttes et al., 2009), which could result 13 increase the δ C of cold surface water. Lastly, the global from a northward shift in westerly winds over the South- 13 − average δ C of the ocean is thought to change by 0.3‰ ern Ocean, increased sea ice cover, and/or increased sur- (Duplessy et al., 1988) during glaciations as the result of a face stratification (Toggweiler et al., 2006). Increases in 13 net transfer of low-δ C organic carbon from the continents the biological productivity of the Southern Ocean may also to the ocean (Shackleton, 1977). contribute to the decrease in δ13C(Brovkin et al., 2007; Today North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW), which fills Martinez-Garcia et al., 2009). most of the deep Atlantic above 4000 m, has the highest Because PDW is derived from a mixture of NCW and δ13C of all deep water (∼1‰; Kroopnick, 1985) because it SCW that progressively accumulates low-δ13C organic car- is recently formed from surface water that experiences high bon during its transit, one might expect that minimum δ13C biological productivity. Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW), values would always occur in the deep Pacific. How- which is formed from water with incomplete nutrient utiliza- ever, LGM Pacific δ13C measurements (although somewhat tion, has lower δ13C values (∼ 0.2; Kroopnick, 1985) and is sparse) indicate that the lowest LGM Pacific δ13C values found below 4000 m in the South Atlantic. Although PDW is (−0.4‰, Matsumoto et al., 2002) were much less negative formed from approximately equal parts NADW and AABW than the −0.9‰ values found in the deep South Atlantic. (Broecker et al., 1998), remineralization in the deep Pacific LGM reconstructions show a slight decrease in PDW δ13C makes PDW δ13C values more negative than AABW, with a below 2000 m and a slight increase above 2000 m (Herguera minimum value of approximately −0.2‰ in the oldest wa- et al., 1992; Matsumoto et al., 2002). The lowest values re- ter in the North Pacific (Kroopnick, 1985; Keigwin, 1998; main in the north but shift from 2000 m today to 3000 m at Matsumoto et al., 2002). Alternatively, a study by John- the LGM (Matsumoto et al., 2002). The only observations of son (2008) suggests that PDW may be approximately 60% lower Pacific δ13C values (−0.8‰) are in the western South AABW, 20% NADW and 20% Antarctic Intermediate Water Pacific at 2000–3000 m where SCW enters the Pacific (Mc- (AAIW). Cave et al., 2008). The δ13C of carbonate from benthic foraminifera is used Thus, during the LGM the lowest δ13C values are found to estimate past changes in a water mass’s δ13C composition in the South Atlantic rather than the Pacific. Does re- and spatial extent.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us