Introduction to Supersymmetry(1)

Introduction to Supersymmetry(1)

Introduction to Supersymmetry(1) J.N. Tavares Dep. Matem¶aticaPura, Faculdade de Ci^encias,U. Porto, 4000 Porto TQFT Club 1Esta ¶euma vers~aoprovis¶oria,incompleta, para uso exclusivo nas sess~oesde trabalho do TQFT club CONTENTS 1 Contents 1 Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics 2 1.1 The Supersymmetric Oscillator . 2 1.2 Witten Index . 4 1.3 A fundamental example: The Laplacian on forms . 7 1.4 Witten's proof of Morse Inequalities . 8 2 Supergeometry and Supersymmetry 13 2.1 Field Theory. A quick review . 13 2.2 SuperEuclidean Space . 17 2.3 Reality Conditions . 18 2.4 Supersmooth functions . 18 2.5 Supermanifolds . 21 2.6 Lie Superalgebras . 21 2.7 Super Lie groups . 26 2.8 Rigid Superspace . 27 2.9 Covariant Derivatives . 30 3 APPENDIX. Cli®ord Algebras and Spin Groups 31 3.1 Cli®ord Algebras . 31 Motivation. Cli®ord maps . 31 Cli®ord Algebras . 33 Involutions in V .................................. 35 Representations . 36 3.2 Pin and Spin groups . 43 3.3 Spin Representations . 47 3.4 U(2), spinors and almost complex structures . 49 3.5 Spinc(4)...................................... 50 Chiral Operator. Self Duality . 51 2 1 Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics 1.1 The Supersymmetric Oscillator i As we will see later the \hermitian supercharges" Q®, in the N extended SuperPoincar¶eLie Algebra obey the anticommutation relations: i j m ij fQ®;Q¯g = 2(γ C)®¯± Pm (1.1) m where ®; ¯ are \spinor" indices, i; j 2 f1; ¢ ¢ ¢ ;Ng \internal" indices and (γ C)®¯ a bilinear form in the spinor indices ®; ¯. When specialized to 0-space dimensions ((1+0)-spacetime), then since P0 = H, relations (1.1) take the form (with a little change in notations): fQi;Qjg = 2±ij H (1.2) with N \Hermitian charges" Qi; i = 1; ¢ ¢ ¢ ;N. Let us see some imediate consequences of relations (1.2: ² The supercharges Qi are constants of motion. In fact: [H; Q] = [Q2;Q] = 0 (1.3) where Q is any of the Qi. ² The Hamiltonian H is an hermitian positive operator, and so the energy spectrum is always positive de¯nite. In fact: 2 2 H = Q1 = ¢ ¢ ¢ = QN (1.4) So, 8jÃi 2 H we have: hÃjHjÃi = hÃjQ2jÃi = hÃjQyQjÃi = kQjÃik2 ¸ 0 where Q is any of the Qi. This also proves that: ² ker H = \i ker Qi (1.5) Since the Hamiltonian H is a positive operator, any eigenstate jÃ0 > of H with zero eigenvalue is a \ground state", and for such a ground state we have that QijÃ0 >= 0; 8i. We then say that the \supersymmetry is unbroken". When there is no eigenstate with zero eigenvalue, then the ground state jÃ0i has energy EÃ0 > 0. This implies that QjÃ0i 6= 0 and we then say that we have \spontaneous susy breaking". Now we focus our attention in the N = 2 model, which we call the: 1.1 The Supersymmetric Oscillator 3 \Supersymmetric Oscillator" In this case let us de¯ne the following two \nonhermitian supercharges", adjoint of each other: def 1 S = (Q + iQ ) 2 1 2 def 1 S = Sy = = (Q ¡ iQ ) (1.6) 2 1 2 Then we have the following \representation" for the above (N = 2)-Susy algebra: 2 2 H = Q1 = Q2 = fS; Sg S2 = S2 = 0 (1.7) We also have [H; Q] = 0, where Q is any of the Qi;S or S. Consider the Hilbert space H with basis: jnB; nF i nB = 0; 1; 2; ¢ ¢ ¢ ; 1 nF = 0; 1 (1.8) y where nB and nF are \boson" and \fermion occupation numbers" respectivelly, and let a; a \anihilation-creation" bosonic operators, and f; f y \anihilation-creation" fermionic opera- tors, acting on H in the standard way. They satisfy the following commutation and anti- commutation relations: [a; ay] = 1 ff; f yg = 1 f 2 = (f y)2 = 0 [a; f] = 0 (1.9) Then if we put: def S = k af y \destroy a boson ­ create a fermion" def S = k ayf \create a boson ­ destroy a fermion" (1.10) where k is a constant so that S and S are adjoints of each other (S = Sy), we see that: y S jnB; nF i = k af jnB; nF > / jnB ¡ 1; nF + 1i y S jnB; nF i = k a fjnB; nF > / jnB + 1; nF ¡ 1i (1.11) so that these operators convert a boson into a fermion and vice-versa. Moreover we can verify properties (1.7), using (1.9). 1.2 Witten Index 4 Now what about the Hamiltonian? We compute: H = fS; Sg = k2(af yayf + ayfaf y) 1 1 = k2(aya + ) + k2(f yf ¡ ) 2 2 def = HB + HF (1.12) So the H is the sum of two non-interacting terms: the Hamiltonian of the bosonic oscillator HB with energy spectrum EB, and the Hamiltonian of the fermionic oscillator HF with energy spectrum EF given respectivelly by: 1 1 H = k2(aya + ) E = k2(n + ) n = 0; 1; 2; 3; ¢ ¢ ¢ B 2 B B 2 B 1 1 H = k2(f yf ¡ ) E = k2(n ¡ ) n = 0; 1 (1.13) F 2 F F 2 B Note that: 2 y y y y y nF = f f f f = f ff; f gf = f f = nF and so in fact the eigenvalues of nF are 0; 1 which is the \Pauli exclusion principle". Note also that the frequencies ! = k2 of these two oscillators are the same. 1.2 Witten Index For the above (N = 2)-Susy QM model, we can de¯ne an operator: def (¡1)F = (¡1)nF 1l such that: F F 2 F y F f(¡1) ;Qig = 0 ((¡1) ) = 1l ((¡1) ) = (¡1) (1.14) Converselly, given an Hilbert space H and hermitian operators H; Q; (¡1)F such that (¡1)F is bounded and: H = Q2 ((¡1)F )2 = 1l fQ; (¡1)F g = 0 (1.15) we can de¯ne a (N = 2)-Susy QM model by putting: F Q1 = Q and Q2 = i(¡1) Q We explore now the abstract data given by an Hilbert space H and hermitian operators H; Q; (¡1)F , with (¡1)F bounded, and verifying conditions (1.15). Here follows some properties of this \abstract Susy model", fH; Q; (¡1)F g, which are imediate consequences of conditions (1.15): 1.2 Witten Index 5 I ² [(¡1)F ;H] = [(¡1)F ;Q2] = f(¡1)F ;QgQ ¡ QfQ; (¡1)F g = 0 (1.16) II ² We have a decomposition of H in eigenspaces of (¡1)F corresponding to the eigenvalues §: H = Hb © Hf with: F Hb = f à 2 H :(¡1) à = +à g F Hf = f à 2 H :(¡1) à = ¡Ã g (1.17) F so that (¡1) acts on H as: " # 1l 0 (¡1)F = b 0 ¡1lf III ² The involution (¡1)F induces also a decomposition on the algebra of operators acting on H. If: " # AB K = CD acts on H = Hb © Hf , then: " # A 0 - K is \bosonic" or \even" i® [(¡1)F ;K] = 0 i® K = 0 D " # 0 B - K is \fermionic" or \odd" i® f(¡1)F ;Kg = 0 i® K = C 0 IV ² In particular, since Q is hermitian and anticommutes with (¡1)F , we have that Q is odd and: " # 0 Ay Q = (1.18) A 0 So, applying Q to a vector à = Ãb © Ãf 2 H, we have: " #" # " # 0 Ay à Ayà Qà = b = f A 0 Ãf AÃb and since this belongs to Hb © Hf we must have: QbHb = A : Hb ¡! Hf y QbHf = A : Hf ¡! Hb (1.19) Note also that: " # AyA 0 H = (1.20) 0 AAy 1.2 Witten Index 6 V ² Now we turn to the fundamental property of this Susy model. Let à be an eigenvalue of H with positive energy E > 0: Hà = Eà E > 0 Then, as [H; Q] = 0 we have: H(QÃ) = Q(HÃ) = E (QÃ) which means that Qà is again an eigenvalue of H with the same positive energy E > 0. Note that if E = 0 we can not apply this reasoning, since Hà = 0 implies that: 0 = hÃjHjÃi = hÃjQ2jÃi = hÃjQyQjÃi = kQÃk2 and so Qà = 0 which is not an eigenvector. As we have seen, if à 2 Hb (resp., Hf ) then Qà 2 Hf (resp., Hb) (we call Qà the \superpartner" of Ã), and so we conclude that \all eigenstates with energy E > 0 are paired": dim ker[(H ¡ E)bHb)] = dim ker[(H ¡ E)bHf )] 8E > 0 (1.21) H Q H E > 0 b Ã! f Bosonic sector Fermionic sector ............................................... Hb E = 0 Hf Nf Nb | {z } Q = 0 here Here we have put: Nb = dim ker(HbHb) Nf = dim ker(HbHf ) (1.22) If either Nb or Nf are nonzero, then there exists a state of zero energy (a ground sate) and supersymmetry is unbroken. So if we can compute Nb or Nf we can decide about Susy breaking. In general this is a di±cult problem, and the only thing available is the di®erence Nb ¡ Nf . Thus we de¯ne the \Witten index" as: ¢W = Nb ¡ Nf (1.23) 1.3 A fundamental example: The Laplacian on forms 7 This has remarkable stability properties. In fact \small perturbations" of the system don't a®ect ¢W , since the states of non-zero energy move always in Bose-Fermi pairs. " # 0 Ay Since Q has the form (1.18), i.e., Q = , with A an elliptic operator, then by A 0 (1.19), we have that: ¢W = Nb ¡ Nf = dim ker A ¡ dim ker Ay = index (A) (1.24) 1.3 A fundamental example: The Laplacian on forms Assume that M is a compact oriented closed smooth n-dimensional Riemannian manifold, and let ­k(M) be the Hilbert space obtained by completion of the space of smooth k-forms, with respect to the usual inner product: Z < ®; ¯ >= ® ^ ¤¯ M Now we construct an \abstract Susy model" fH; Q; (¡1)F g, on the Hilbert space: def n k H = ©k=0 ­ (M) (1.25) by de¯ning: ² H = ¢ = dd¤ + d¤d, the operator closure of the usual laplacian on smooth forms.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    54 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us