INDIAN BUREAU OF MINES MINERALS DEVELOPMEMT AND REGULATION DIVISION MCDR INSPECTION REPORT Hyderabad regional office Mine file No : AP/NLG/LST-3/HYD Mine code : 38APR14025 (i) Name of the Inspecting : PR09( ) M.Pratap.Reddy Officer and ID No. (ii) Designation : Assistant Mining Geologis (iii) Accompaning mine : R.RAM REDDY MENES MANAGER Official with Designation (iv) Date of Inspection : 11/03/2017 (v) Prev.inspection date : 27/10/2015 PART-I : GENERAL INFORMATION 1. (a) Mine Name : MATTAPALLI (b) Registration NO. : (c) Category : A Mechanised (d) Type of Working : Opencast (e) Postal address State : TELANGANA District : NALGONDA Village : MATTAPALLI Taluka : HUZURNAGAR Post office : SEEMAPURI Pin Code : 508204 FAX No. : 08683-227629 E-mail : mines @nclind.com Phone : 08683- 227630 ,227640 (f) Police Station : MATTAMPALLY (g) First opening date : 05/06/1998 (h) Weekly day of rest : SUN 2. Address for : MATTAPALLY correspondance MATTAMPALLY MANDAL NALGONDA DISTRICT 3. (a) Lease Number : APR1312 (b) Lease area : 46.36 (c) Period of lease : 20 (d) Date of Expiry : 28/05/2018 4. Mineral worked : LIMESTONE Main PAGE : 2 5. Name and Address of the Lessee : NCL INDUSTRIES LTD 3-8-352, RR TOWERS CHIRAGALI LANE HYDERABAD HYDERABAD TELANGANA Phone:23203637 FAX :040-23202496 Owner : K.RAVI NCL INDUSTRIES LTD 3-8- 352,7TH FLOOR,R.RATNA TOWERS,CHIRAGALI LANE HYDERABAD TELANGANA Phone: 040-23203637 FAX : 040-23202496 Agent : P.N.RAJU S3-8-352, RR TOWERS CHIRAGALI LANE HYDERABAD HYDERABAD TELANGANA Phone: 08683227634 FAX : 08683227629 Mining Engineer Name : S.K.NAZEER,Full Time Qualification : B.E. Appointment/ : 29/09/2009 Termination date Manager Name : E.UPENDRA CHARY Qualification : DIPLOMA IN MINING & FIRST CLASS MINES Appointment/ : 20/10/2010 Termination date 6. Date of approval of Mining : Mining Scheme rule 12 MCDR1988 05/03/2003 Plan/Scheme of Mining Modif.approved Mining Scheme 28/04/2006 Mining Scheme rule 12 MCDR1988 19/05/2008 Mining Scheme rule 12 MCDR1988 23/09/2013 PAGE : 3 PART - II : OBSERVATION/COMMENTS OF INSPECTING OFFICERS Exploration : Sl.No. Item Proposals Actual work Remarks 1a Backlog of No backlog - previous year exploration is pending- 1b Exploration over G1 Scale of G1 scale of exploration lease area for exploration has been completed. geological axis 1 or 2 1c Exploration Exploration Rock Engineering Agencies and agency name Coredrills. Expeniture Expenditure in has not been incurred is Rs. 7.80,000 lakh rupees proposed. during the year Expenditure details have also not been furnished. 1d Balance area to 4.013 ha 4.013 ha be explored to bring Geological axis in 1 or 2 1e Balance reserve 1,97,39,650 T 1,96,88,950 T There is a minor as on 01/04/20 variation in the balance reserve. The deviation is about 0.25% 1f General remarks Simple bedded Simple subhorizntal of inspecting deposit with bedded deposit with 92% officers on 90% of G1 of G1 scale exploration. geology, scale exploration etc exploration. Development : Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 2a Location of Between Development cum NA development Coordinates production is carried w.r.t.lease area W85-E565 and out beween coordintes S250-S600 W85-E565 and S250-S600 2b Separate benches No such Benches as proposed have in topsoil, proposals have been formed in the overburden and been made Limestone. minerals (Rule since there is 15) no top soil and overburden and all the benches proposed are in Limestone only. PAGE : 4 2c Stripping ratio Nil Nil or ore to OB ratio 2d Quantity of Nil - topsoil generation in m3 2e Quantity of Nil - overburden generation in m3 2f General remarks Single pit Simple sub horizental of inspecting where all the bedded deposit without officers on benches have any overburden and all development of been proposed the benches are in pit w.r.t. type in Limestone Limestone itself in of deposit etc only. single pit. Exploitation: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 3a Number of pit Single Pit Single Pit NA proposed for production 3b Quantity of ROM 8,00,000 Mt 8,54,000 Mt Marginal excess mineral production by production about 6.75% proposed 3c Recovery of 100 % Recovery Except handling losses sailable/usable there is no recovery mineral from ROM loss. production 3d Quantity of Nil - mineral reject generation 3e Grade of mineral None. There is - rejects no generation generation and mineral threshold value rejects. declared. 3f Quantity of sub No proposal of - grade mineral generation of generation. sub grade mineral. 3g Grade of sub None - grade mineral generation 3h Manual / No segregation - Mechanised proposals method adopted for segregating from ROM PAGE : 5 3i Any analysis or None - beneficiation study proposed and carried out for sub grade mineral and rejects. 3j Provision of Yes, made. Drilling and blasting is drilling and being carried out in the blasting in mineral benches. mineral benches 3k Provision of Yes, proposals As proposed, machinary mining have been made has been deployed in machineries in for movement mineral benches. mineral benches of mining machinary in mineral benches 3l Whether height yes, The bench height is of benches in maitained at 6 mts which overburden and is suitable for mineral suitable mechanised method of for method of mining. mining proposed in MP/SOM 3m Total area 32.62 ha 32.62 ha covered under excavation/pits 3n Ore to OB ratio Nil - for the pit/mine during the year. 3o Total area put 37.4 ha 37.39 ha in use under different heads at the end of year 3p Production of 2011-12 = 2011-12 = 8,10,000 T There is neglisble ROM mineral 8,00,000 T 2012-13 = 6,57,750 T deviation of during the last 2012-13 = 2013-14 = 7,57,500T production five year period 8,00,000 T 2014-15 = 8,32,300 T as applicable 2013-14 = 2015-16 = 8,54,000 T 8,00,000 T 2014-15 = 8,00,000 T 2015-16 = 8,00,000 T 3q General remarks Opencast As proposed opencast of inspecting mechanised mechanised metohod of officers on method of mining is practiced. method of mining mining etc. Solid Waste Management - Dumping: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks PAGE : 6 4a Separate dumping There are no - of topsoil, OB such proposals and mineral of top soil,OB rejects (Rule and mineral 32,33) rejects since none of them exists. 4b Location of There are no - topsoil, OB and such proposals mineral reject of top soil,OB dumps and mineral rejects since no such generation . 4c Number of dumps Nil - within lease area and outside of lease area 4d Location of There are no - dumps w.r.t. proposals of ultimate pit dump as there limit (Rule 16) is no generation of waste material. 4e Number of active Nil - and alive dumps. 4f Number of dead Nil - dumps. 4g Number of dumps Nil - established. 4h Whether No such - Retaining wall proposals have or garland drain been made. all along dumps are there. 4i Length of Nil - Retaining wall or garland drain all along dumps 4j Number of Nil - settling ponds 4k Specific There are no No waste dump exists in comments of such proposals the ML area. and hence inspecting of waste dump management of waste dump officer on waste management. does not arise. dump management Solid Waste Management - Backfilling: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks PAGE : 7 5a Status of part No such - or full proposals have extraction of been made as mineral from the mineral is mined out area yet to before starting exhaust. backfilling. 5b Area under Nil - backfilling of mined out area 5c Concurrent use meagre amount As propoosed the meagre of topsoil for soil which is quantity of top soil is restoration or likely to be utilised for rehabilitation generated is afforesation. of mineral out proposed for area (Rule 32) concurrent use for afforestation. 5d Total area Nil - fully reclaimed and rehabilitated 5e General remarks No backfilling - of inspecting and officers on reclamation backfilling and proposals have reclamation etc. been made as the area is yet to mature. Progressive Mine Clousre Plan: Sl.No. Item Propasals Actual work Remarks 6a Whether Annual To be Yes, submitted. report on PMCP submitted. submitted on time and correctly. Rule 23 E(2). 6b Area available No such - for proposals have rehabilitation been made for (ha) . rehabilitation . 6c afforestation Yes Afforestation is done. done (ha). 6d No. of saplings 600 saplings 450 saplings planted during the year 6e Cumulative no 1500 saplings About 1350 saplings .of plants exist. PAGE : 8 6f Any other method N0 - of rehabilitation 6g Cost incurred on No cost Cost incurred is Rs watch and care details and 1,55,000/- during the year haveeen proposed. 6h Compliance on No such - reclamation and proposals have rehabilitation been made by backfilling since the area (i) Voids is yet to available for mature. backfilling ( Lx B x D 6i Compliance on No such - reclamation and proposals have rehabilitation been made by backfilling since the area (ii) Voids is yet to filled by waste mature. / tailings 6j Compliance on No such - reclamation and proposals have rehabilitation been made. by backfilling (iii)Afforestati on on backfilled area 6k Compliance on No such - reclamation and proposals have rehabilitation been made . by backfilling (iv) Rehabilitation by making water reservoir 6l Compliance on No such - reclamation and proposals have rehabilitation been made . by backfilling (v)any other specific means. 6m Compliance of No such - rehabilitation proposals have of waste land been made within lease since no waste (i)afforestation land exists in the lease area. PAGE : 9 6n Compliance of No such - rehabilitation proposals have of waste land been made .