Global Assessment of the Antimicrobial Activity of Polymyxin B Against 54 731 Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli

Global Assessment of the Antimicrobial Activity of Polymyxin B Against 54 731 Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector ORIGINAL ARTICLE 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01351.x Global assessment of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B against 54 731 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance programme (2001–2004) A. C. Gales1, R. N. Jones2,3 and H. S. Sader1,2 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Universidade Federal de Sa˜o Paulo, Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil, 2JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA, and 3Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA ABSTRACT In total, 54 731 Gram-negative bacilli isolated worldwide between 2001 and 2004 from diverse sites of infection were tested for susceptibility to polymyxin B by the broth reference microdilution method, with interpretation of results according to CLSI (formerly NCCLS) guidelines. Polymyxin B showed excellent potency and spectrum against 8705 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 2621 Acinetobacter spp. isolates (MIC50, £ ⁄ ⁄ 1mg L and MIC90,2mg L for both pathogens). Polymyxin B resistance rates were slightly higher for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (2.7%) and Acinetobacter spp. (2.8%), or multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa (3.3%) and Acinetobacter spp. (3.2%), when compared with the entire group (1.3% for P. aeruginosa and 2.1% for Acinetobacter spp.). Among P. aeruginosa, polymyxin B resistance rates varied from 2.9% in the Asia-Pacific region to only 1.1% in Europe, Latin America and North America, while polymyxin B resistance rates ranged from 2.7% in Europe to 1.7% in North America and Latin America £ ⁄ % among Acinetobacter spp. Polymyxin B also demonstrated excellent activity (MIC90, 1mg L; > 98 susceptible) against Citrobacter spp., Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., but activity was more variable £ ⁄ % against Enterobacter spp. (MIC50, 1mg L; 83.3 susceptible) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC50, £ ⁄ % ⁄ 1mg L; 72.4 susceptible), and was very limited (MIC50,>8mg L) against Burkholderia cepacia (11.8% susceptible), Serratia spp. (5.4% susceptible), indole-positive Proteus spp. (1.3% susceptible) and Proteus mirabilis (0.7% susceptible). Keywords Antimicrobial activity, Gram-negative bacilli, polymyxin B, resistance, SENTRY, surveillance Original Submission: 20 October 2005; Accepted: 17 November 2005 Clin Microbiol Infect 2006; 12: 315–321 thereby displacing the calcium and magnesium INTRODUCTION cations that stabilise the LPS molecules. This The polymyxins are amphipatic polypeptide process is independent of the entry of polymyx- antimicrobial agents. Their basic structure con- ins into the cell, and results in an increase in sists of a fatty-acid side-chain attached to a cell-envelope permeability, leakage of cell con- polycationic peptide ring composed of eight to tents and, consequently, cell death [2,3]. More- ten amino-acids [1]. The polymyxins possess a over, the fatty-acid side-chain of polymyxins unique mechanism of action, targeting the bac- interacts with the LPS molecules to facilitate terial cell-membrane. The polycationic peptide further complexing between the polymyxins and ring of the polymyxins interacts with the the cell-membrane [4]. In addition to their anionic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules in antibacterial action, the polymyxins also possess the outer-membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, anti-endotoxin activity. The endotoxin of Gram- negative bacteria is the lipid A portion of LPS molecules, which is neutralised by the action of Corresponding author and reprint requests: A. C. Gales, polymyxin [5]. Division of Infectious Diseases, Universidade Federal de Sa˜o The polymyxins have activity against a wide Paulo, Rua Leandro Dupret 188, Sa˜o Paulo – SP, Brazil CEP 04025–010 variety of Gram-negative bacilli, including E-mail: [email protected] Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermentative isolates Ó 2006 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 316 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 12 Number 4, April 2006 [6,7]. Polymyxins B and E (colistin) were intro- Susceptibility testing duced into clinical practice during the 1950s for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth the treatment of Gram-negative infections. How- microdilution according to CLSI (formerly NCCLS) guidelines ever, the parenteral use of these compounds was and the results were interpreted following the latest suggested £ ⁄ abandoned during the 1970s when better-toler- breakpoints (polymyxin B susceptible breakpoint of 2mg L) [13,14]. Dry-form microdilution panels and broth for inocula- ated anti-pseudomonal agents became available tion were from Trek Diagnostics Inc. (Cleveland, OH, USA); [4,8]. The emergence of multidrug-resistant selected comparator agents were: cefepime, ceftazidime, pip- (MDR) isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and eracillin ⁄ tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, ⁄ Acinetobacter spp. has required the expanded amikacin, gentamicin, trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole (Burkholderia cepacia and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia only), systemic use of these polymyxins [9]. Carbape- ampicillin ⁄ sulbactam (Acinetobacter spp. only) and ticarcil- nem resistance has been increasing among lin ⁄ clavulanate (S. maltophilia only). Quality control strains P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. isolates [10– Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and 35218, and P. aeruginosa ATCC 12]. As the use of polymyxin increases, the 27853, were tested for quality assurance purposes, with all results within published ranges [14]. emergence of polymyxin resistance may become a concern. The main objective of this study was to assess the contemporary activity and spectrum of RESULTS polymyxin B, as a marker of polymyxin potency, The antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B against against a worldwide collection of Gram-negative 13 808 non-fermentative isolates of Gram-negative bacilli isolated through the SENTRY antimicrobial bacteria is summarised in Table 1 in comparison surveillance programme (2001–2004). with the other antimicrobial agents tested. Only polymyxin B demonstrated reasonable potency and spectrum against Acinetobacter spp. (MIC ⁄ , MATERIALS AND METHODS 50 90 £ 1 ⁄ 2mg⁄ L; 97.9% susceptible) and P. aeruginosa Study design £ ⁄ ⁄ % (MIC50 ⁄ 90, 1 2mg L; 98.7 susceptible). Sus- The SENTRY programme monitored the predominant patho- ceptibility rates for the other antimicrobial agents gens and their antimicrobial resistance patterns, via a broad tested ranged between 44.3% (ciprofloxacin) and network of sentinel hospitals, in four major geographical 81.1% (imipenem) for Acinetobacter spp., and regions: Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America and North Amer- % % ica (USA and Canada). Guided by common protocols, bacterial between 70.5 (ciprofloxacin) and 88.3 (amika- isolates from diverse body sites were forwarded to the regional cin) for P. aeruginosa. Polymyxin B showed variable monitors (JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA, for activity against some other non-fermentative isolates from North America, Latin America and Europe; the Gram-negative bacilli, such as Pseudomonas spp. Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, for £ ⁄ ⁄ isolates from the Asia-Pacific region) for confirmation of other than P. aeruginosa (MIC50 ⁄ 90, 1 4mg L; % organism identification and reference susceptibility testing. 88.3 susceptible) and S. maltophilia (MIC50 ⁄ 90, Only a single isolate per patient was referred to the monitoring 1 ⁄ 8mg⁄ L; 72.4% susceptible), and only very centre. Common reagents and methodologies were used in limited activity against B. cepacia (MIC50, both central laboratories. >8 mg⁄ L; 11.8% susceptible). Trimethoprim ⁄ £ ⁄ % sulphamethoxazole (MIC50, 0.5 mg L; 85.6 Participating medical centres susceptible) was the most potent agent against The number of participating centres varied according to the ⁄ % B. cepacia, but meropenem (MIC50,1mg L; 94.1 ) geographical region, with 42 North American sites (five in exhibited the highest susceptibility rate, followed Canada and 37 in the USA), 30 in Europe, 12 in Latin America, ⁄ % and 17 in the Asia-Pacific region. by ceftazidime (MIC50,2mg L; 92.2 ). The activity of polymyxin B against 40 923 Bacterial isolates isolates of Enterobacteriaceae is summarised in Table 2. Polymyxin B exhibited the highest activ- In total, 54 731 aerobic Gram-negative bacterial isolates were £ ⁄ collected between January 2001 and December 2004. All ity (MIC90, 1mg L) against Citrobacter spp. isolates were identified at the participating institution by the (99.1% susceptible), E. coli (99.5% susceptible), routine methodology in use at each laboratory. Isolates with Klebsiella spp. (98.2% susceptible) and Shigella imipenem or meropenem MICs ‡ 16 mg ⁄ L were considered to spp. (99.0% susceptible). However, polymyxin B be resistant to carbapenems. Isolates exhibiting resistance to ⁄ showed variable activity against Enterobacter spp. piperacillin tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, % % meropenem, ciprofloxacin and amikacin were categorised as (83.3 susceptible) and Salmonella (76.0 sus- MDR. ceptible), and only limited activity (MIC50, Ó 2006 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 12, 315–321 Gales et al. Polymyxin B activity – SENTRY programme 317 Table 1. Antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B, compared Table 1. Continued with other antimicrobial agents tested, against 13 808 non- aCriteria as published by the CLSI [14]. fermentative Gram-negative isolates (SENTRY antimicro-

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us