Update Alert the Supreme Court Denies Petition to Hear Andrea Lea, Arkansas State Auditor V. United

Update Alert the Supreme Court Denies Petition to Hear Andrea Lea, Arkansas State Auditor V. United

UPdate Alert LINKING ASSETS INC. A Jaisan Recovery Corp. OCTOBER 2020 Litigation UPdate and redemption of United States Savings Bonds preempt the State of Arkansas from obtaining ownership of matured but unredeemed bonds through a statute providing for the escheat of Andrea Lea, Arkansas State title to the State. Auditor v. United States, et al. 2. Whether the federal statute, regulations, and By Christa DeOliveira, CIA, CCEP contractual provisions governing the transfer and redemption of United States Savings Bonds In Andrea Lea, Arkansas State Auditor v. United States, require the United States Department of the et al. the Supreme Court was asked to review the Treasury to redeem matured savings bonds that findings of the United State Court of Appeals for the are owned by a State pursuant to a valid Federal Circuit. The case sought to clarify judgment of escheatment but that the State jurisdictional questions for matured, unredeemed cannot identify by serial number without Savings Bonds held by the U.S. Treasury. The Treasury’s assistance. Supreme Court denied this petition on October 5, 2020. Details and documents can be viewed at: 3. Whether the interpretation of federal law https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filena adopted by the Federal Circuit below results in an me=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/19-1285.html. uncompensated taking of property in violation of the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause. This case had been previously heard at the Appeals Court on August 13, 2019 (case number 2018-1509, Therefore, the ruling from the United State Court of 2018-1510) and a rehearing was denied on December Appeals for the Federal Circuit stands. Specifically, 11, 2019. The petition for writ of certiorari was “Because the States’ escheat laws attempt to requested and can be viewed here: transfer ownership of the bonds to the States in https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19- contravention of Treasury regulations, they are 1285/143156/20200508145830219_Lea%20v.%20Uni preempted by Federal law. In addition, because the ted%20States%20-%20Petition.pdf. States lack the serial numbers or possession of the bonds at issue, they could not redeem the bonds There were three central questions presented in the even if they validly owned them.” May 8, 2020, petition: (https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19- 1285/134443/20200228122601820_Exhibit%20A.pdf) 1. Whether the federal statute, regulations, and contractual provisions governing the transfer 535 5th Avenue, 24th Floor | New York, New York 10017 | (212) 256-1155 | www.linkingassets.com © 2020 Linking Assets Inc. all rights reserved. .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us