Prepared for County of Sarasota Coastal

Prepared for County of Sarasota Coastal

FINAL REPORT LITTLE SARASOTA BAY CIRCULATION STUDY Prepared for County of Sarasota Coastal Zone Management Division Environmental Services Department 9250-110-RT Contract No. C82-66 Prepared by Stergios A. Dendrou Charles I. Moore Raymond Walton CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE 7630 Little River Turnpike Annandale, Virginia 22003 August 1983 Suggested reference Camp Dresser & McKee and Mote Marine Laboratory. 1983. Little Sarasota Bay circulation study. Sarasota County. Contract no C82-66. Mote Marine Laboratory Technical Report no 57. 175 p. Available from: Mote Marine Laboratory Library. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. LIST OF FIGURES . iii LIST OF TABLES . ix I INTRODUCTION ........................................... I-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA .......................... I-1 SCOPE OF WORK .......................................... I-3 REPORT OUTLINE ......................................... I-4 II RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS . II-1 III LITTLE SARASOTA BAY MODEL .............................. III-1 DYNAMIC ESTUARY MODEL .................................. III-1 MODEL THEORY ........................................... III-1 Basic Hydrodynamic Equations ...................... III-4 Numerical Solution-Stability ...................... III-5 Boundary Conditions ............................... III-6 LITTLE SARASOTA BAY GRID NETWORK ....................... III-7 Geometric Input Data .............................. III-7 IV PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ................................... IV-1 TIDES AND TIDAL PHASING ................................ IV-1 WIND EFFECTS ........................................... IV-16 FRESHWATER INFLOWS ..................................... IV-17 V FIELD PROGRAM .......................................... V-1 INTRODUCTION ........................................... V-1 BATHYMETRIC SURVEY ..................................... V-1 TIDE GAGES ............................................. V-2 CURRENT VELOCITY STUDIES ............................... V-5 DYE AND DROGUE STUDIES ................................. V-9 VI MODEL CALIBRATION ...................................... VI-1 CALIBRATION PROCEDURE .................................. VI-1 CALIBRATION RESULTS .................................... VI-2 July Simulation Period ............................ VI-3 April Simulation Period ........................... VI-9 DISCUSSION ............................................. VI-9 VII MODEL VERIFICATION ..................................... VII-1 VERIFICATION PROCEDURE ................................. VII-1 NOVEMBER SIMULATION RESULTS ............................ VII-1 DISCUSSION ............................................. VII-19 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Section Page No. VIII MODEL APPLICATIONS ..................................... VIII-1 ANALYSIS OF BAY CIRCULATION ............................ VIII-1 "NO-NAME" STORM ANALYSIS ............................... VIII-18 Introduction ...................................... VIII-18 Simulation of Storm ............................... VIII-23 Simulation Results ................................ VIII-25 IMPACTS OF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY ON BAY CIRCULATION .... VIII-43 CONSEQUENCES OF MIDNIGHT PASS DREDGING ................. VIII-46 CONVECTION AND DISPERSION CHARACTERISTICS AROUND BIRD ISLAND - DYE STUDY ................................... VIII-62 IX CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . IX-1 REFERENCES APPENDICES (Separate Volume) A Preliminary Model Inputs B Bathymetric Survey Data C Reduced Tide Data for Four Study Periods D Field Data E Final Model Inputs F Velocity Vector Plots for April and July Periods G Program Listing ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Page No. I-1 Little Sarasota Bay .................................... I-2 III-1 Definition Sketch - Node-Link Estuary Model ............ III-2 III-2 Little Sarasota Bay DEM Link Node Network .............. III-8 IV-1 Predicted High and Low Tides at St. Petersburg, April 1982 ................................................. IV-7 IV-2 Diurnal Tide at all Boundaries ......................... IV-8 IV-3 Semi-Diurnal Tide at all Boundaries .................... IV-10 IV-4 Semi-Diurnal Tide in Phase at Stickney and Blackburn Points ............................................... IV-12 IV-5 Semi-Diurnal Tide with Stickney Point Lagged One Half- Hour from Blackburn Point ............................ IV-13 IV-6 Semi-Diurnal Tide with Stickney Point Lagged Two Hours from Blackburn Point ................................. IV-14 IV-7 Effect of 50 mph Wind from Stickney Point .............. IV-18 IV-8 Little Sarasota Bay Drainage Subbasins ................. IV-19 V-1 Bathymetry Transects ................................... V-3 V-2 Location of Tidal Gages and Velocity Measurement Stations ............................................. V-4 VI-1 Observed vs. Simulated Elevations at Gage No. 2, July 13-14, 1982 .......................................... VI-5 VI-2 Observed vs. Simulated Elevations at Gage No. 3, July 13-14, 1982 .......................................... VI-6 VI-3 Observed vs. Simulated Elevations at Gage No. 4, July 13-14, 1982 .......................................... VI-7 VI-4 Observed vs. Simulated Elevations at Gage No. 5, July 13-14, 1982 .......................................... VI-8 VI-5 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 1, July 13-14, 1982 .......................................... VI-10 VI-6 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 2, July 13-14, 1982 .......................................... VI-11 iii LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure No. Page No. VI-7 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 3, Magnitude and Direction, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-12 VI-8 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 4, Magnitude and Direction, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-13 VI-9 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 5, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-14 VI -10 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 6, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-15 VI -11 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 7, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-16 VI-12 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 8, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-17 VI-13 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 9, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-18 VI-14 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 10, Magnitude and Direction, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-19 VI-15 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 11, Magnitude and Direction, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-20 VI-16 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 12, July 13-14, 1982 . VI-21 VI-17 Observed vs. Simulated Elevation at Gage No. 2, April 28- 29, 1982 . VI-22 VI-18 Observed vs. Simulated Elevation at Gage No. 3, April 28- 29, 1982 . VI-23 VI-19 Observed vs. Simulated Elevation at Gage No. 4, April 28- 29, 1982 . VI-24 VI-20 Observed vs. Simulated Elevation at Gage No. 5, April 28- 29, 1982 . VI-25 VI-21 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 1, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-26 VI-22 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 2, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-27 iv LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure No. Page No. VI-23 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 3, Magnitude and Direction, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-28 VI-24 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 4, Magnitude and Direction, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-29 VI-25 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 5, April 28-29, 1982 . .... VI-30 VI-26 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 6, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-31 VI-27 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 7, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-32 VI-28 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 8, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-33 VI-29 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 9, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-34 VI-30 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 10, Magnitude and Direction, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-35 VI -31 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 11, Magnitude and Direction, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-36 VI-32 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 12, April 28-29, 1982 . VI-37 VI-33 Velocity and Vorticity at the Centroid of a Grid Element VI-40 VI-34 Vorticity Calculations at Station 4 . VI-41 VI-35 Vorticity Field and Sub-Grid Scale Vorticity . VI-44 VII-1 Observed vs. Simulated Elevation at Gage No. 2, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-3 VII-2 Observed vs. Simulated Elevation at Gage No. 3, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-4 VII-3 Observed vs. Simulated Elevation at Gage No. 4, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-5 VII-4 Observed vs. Simulated Elevation at Gage No. 5, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-6 V LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure No. Page No. VII-5 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 1, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-7 VII-6 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 2, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-8 VII-7 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 3, Magnitude and Direction, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-9 VII-8 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 4, Magnitude and Direction, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-10 VII-9 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 5, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-11 VII-10 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 6, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-12 VII-11 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 7, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-13 VII-12 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 8, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-14 VII-13 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 9, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-15 VII-14 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 10, Magnitude and Direction, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-16 VII-15 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station No. 11, Magnitude and Direction, November 10-11, 1982 . VII-17 VII-16 Observed vs. Simulated Velocity at Station

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    186 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us