Bandwidth and Latency Latency

Bandwidth and Latency Latency

Bandwidth and Latency Latency • Time it takes to send a message from point A to point B Bandwidth • Components of latency • Amount of data that can be transmitted per time unit Latency = Propagation + Transmit + Queueing ⇒ transmitted = put into the pipe (wire) Propagation = Distance / Speed-of-Light • Example: 10Mbps (10 million bits per second) Transmit = Packet-Size / Bandwidth • Speed of light (electromagnetic wave) – 3.0 × 108 meters/second in a vacuum – 2.3 × 108 meters/second in a cable × 8 1 bit/sec −> 2 seconds – 2.0 10 meters/second in a fiber – C = λ × f Latency 2 bits/sec −> 1 second High-speed networks — high-bandwidth network Given a file of 1 giga bits in size – • Gigabit networks – 1 second transmission time Transmission Propagation Queueing • Megabit networks – 1,000 seconds transmission time UDel CISC Computer Networks (CCS) Bandwidth and Latency-1 UDel CISC Computer Networks (CCS) Bandwidth and Latency-2 Performance • Relative importance of bandwidth vs. latency – depending on applications Network performance is measured in 2 fundamental ways – small message (e.g., 1 byte): [1ms vs 100ms] (latency) (1) Bandwidth (throughput – measured performance) dominates [1Mbps vs 100Mbps] – large message (e.g., 25 MB): [1Mbps vs 100Mbps] (BW) • Amount of data that can be transmitted per time unit dominates [1ms vs 100ms] • Example: 10Mbps (10 million bits per second) • Delay × Bandwidth Product – volume of pipe (2) Latency (delay) how many bits the sender must tx. before the 1st bit arrives at the receiver • Time it takes to send message from point A to point B ⇒ the amount of data that could be in transit • Components of latency delay Latency = Propagation + Transmit + Queueing Propagation = Distance / Speed-of-Light bandwidth Transmit = Packet-Size / Bandwidth • Speed of light Example: 100ms RTT and 45Mbps BW ≈ 560 KB of data – 3.0 × 108 meters/second in a vacuum – 2.3 × 108 meters/second in a cable Principle – keep the pipe full – 2.0 × 108 meters/second in a fiber • Application needs (vs. channel can support) • Notes – bandwidth: digital library (burst; the more the better) vs. – no queueing delays in direct link video (peak rate; upper limit) – process-to-process latency includes software overhead – latency: one-way delay vs. latency varies from packet to – software overhead can dominate when Distance is packet (jitter) small UDel CISC Computer Networks (CCS) Performance-3 UDel CISC Computer Networks (CCS) Performance-4.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us