FERMILAB-PUB-14-327-A Quantum Entanglement of Matter and Geometry in Large Systems Craig J. Hogan University of Chicago and Fermilab Standard quantum mechanics and gravity are used to estimate the mass and size of idealized gravitating systems where position states of matter and geometry become indeterminate. It is proposed that well-known inconsistencies of standard quantum field theory with general relativity on macroscopic scales can be reconciled by nonstandard, nonlocal entanglement of field states with quantum states of geometry. Wave functions of particle world lines are used to estimate scales of geometrical entanglement and emergent locality. Simple models of entanglement predict coherent fluctuations in position of massive bodies, of Planck scale origin, measurable on a laboratory scale, and may account for the fact that the information density of long lived position states in Standard Model fields, determined by the strong interactions, is the same as that determined holographically by the cosmological constant. I. INTRODUCTION most candidate unified quantum theories (e.g., [4, 5]). However, these theories generally use standard approx- In general relativity, space-time geometry is a dynam- imations on length scales much larger than Planck, so ical system. Einstein's equations govern the evolution of they do not directly address how geometrical quantum a 4-manifold, whose dynamical degrees of freedom carry degrees of freedom behave in large systems. energy and information. The system is classical: the In fact, as discussed here in several examples, standard Einstein equations relate physical quantities with defi- theory predicts indeterminate geometry in systems much nite values at definite, localized points. larger than the Planck length, extending to arbitrarily large scales. Isolated systems with low mass have macro- This geometrical system also interacts with matter. scopic trajectories with the character of quantum wave Of course, matter in the real world is a quantum sys- functions rather than classical trajectories. As shown tem, not a classical one[1, 2]; unlike geometry, properties here, such systems are impractical to create and mea- of matter are indeterminate and not spatially localized. sure, but they are not paradoxical; they require only a In standard general relativity, matter is approximated relatively small total mass, isolated from disturbances by a classical entity, the expectation value of its energy- on gravitational timescales. The quantum character of momentum tensor. such systems, while exotic, does not require new funda- In reality, geometry and matter must join together as mental quantum degrees of freedom of the geometry: in parts of a single quantum system, in order to couple con- them, gravity behaves like any other force in nonrelativis- sistently with each other. In quantum mechanics, subsys- tic quantum mechanics. tems of a whole are entangled[3]. However, the nature of However, important clues to new physics come from the entanglement of matter and geometry is not known, inconsistencies between general relativity and standard because it depends on unknown quantum degrees of free- arXiv:1412.1807v1 [gr-qc] 4 Dec 2014 quantum field theory on large scales. In standard theory, dom of the geometry. the mass of quantum field states can exceed the mass Thus in standard physics, any model of a whole physi- of a black hole in large volumes[6]. Some new, nonlocal cal system has two qualitatively different dynamical sub- principle must prevent excitations of standard quantum systems, quantum matter and classical geometry. The fields, even at modest energies, from forming impossibly combined system is usually approximated in different massive macroscopic geometries. ways, depending on the situation: when quantum effects It is suggested here that this new principle might take are important, the dynamical behavior of the geometry the form of a quantum entanglement between matter is ignored, while if geometrical dynamics are important, fields and geometry. Although it emerges from new the quantum character of the matter is ignored. These Planck scale physics, some forms of this entanglement can approximations are only consistent in some situations; in create new effects, even in nearly-flat space, distinct from others, they lead to paradoxes or ambiguities. This pa- classical modifications of general relativity[7], or macro- per analyzes systems where such inconsistencies arise on scopic quantum behavior in classical geometry[8{10]. In large scales, and seeks to reconcile them. some models, unique signatures of this entanglement may Well-known inconsistencies in the standard scheme oc- be found in precise laboratory measurements of positions cur at the Planck length, which has been the focus of of bodies or mechanical systems[11{15]. 2 Furthermore, it is suggested here that geometrical en- B. Classical Theory tanglement might explain the value of the cosmological constant, a quantity with no current explanation in stan- The standard complete theory of physics| space-time dard theory[16, 17]. The spatial structure of long-lived and matter| follows from the Einstein-Hilbert action world line states in field theory connects the density of lo- calized position states in the field vacuum to an emergent S = SG + SM: (5) global curvature on a vastly different scale. Statistical The actions for geometry S [g (x)] and matter arguments based on information equipartition are used G µν S [g (x); φ (x)] are functionals of the space-time 4- here to account for a long known coincidence between M µν i metric g (x) and matter fields φ (x). the value of the cosmological constant and the sponta- µν i The geometrical action is neous spatial localization scale of Standard Model fields, Z fixed by the strong interactions. 4 p SG = d x −gR(x) (6) 4 II. LIMITS OF STANDARD THEORY where R ≡ R(c =16πG), is the Ricci curvature scalar µν 4 R ≡ g Rµν in units of 16πG=c , Rµν denotes the Ricci curvature tensor (which depends on g (x) and its deriva- The notion that quantum effects of gravity can in some µν tives), and g ≡ Det[gµν ]. circumstances be important on macroscopic scales is both Similarly, the matter action is counterintuitive and generally unfamiliar. Nevertheless, it is a simple consequence of standard theory. To clarify Z p S = d4x −gL(x) (7) the implications, it is useful to outline briefly which as- M pects of standard theory are well-tested, and which are not. where L(x) is the matter Lagrangian density that rep- resents all the non-geometrical degrees of freedom, and defines the theory of particles and fields and their inter- actions. It is a function of fields φ (x ) and their deriva- A. Quantum and Gravitational Extremes of i µ Physical Systems tives. The field equations of relativity follow from the action through the variational principle, The Planck mass and length relate the energy scale of pure spacetime systems, such as black holes and gravita- δS/δgµν = 0: (8) tional waves, to Planck's quantum of action ¯h: Here, δS represents the variation of S for variations in the metric, δg . The variations are arbitrary within m ≡ p¯hc=G = 1:22 × 1019GeV=c2 = 2:18 × 10−8kg; µν P the volume of the system, but assume that δg (x) ! 0 (1) µν at the boundaries of the system, or as xµ ! 1. The µν p 3 −35 coupling of the geometry to matter, via T , emerges lP ≡ ctP ≡ ¯hG=c = 1:616 × 10 m; (2) from the variation of the SM term in Eq. (5); the matter action is is related to standard 4D energy-momentum where G denotes the Newton constant of gravity and c tensor in the field equations by the functional derivative denotes the speed of light. Planck units are defined so µν that ¯h = c = G = 1. T = δSM/δgµν : (9) In Planck units, the size of the most compact spacetime configuration, a black hole, is given by the Schwarzschild The variation (Eq. 8) then leads to the field equations in radius for mass M, their standard form, 1 8πG R = 2M: (3) Rµν − gµν R + gµν Λ = Tµν ; (10) S 2 c2 The minimum size of a quantum wave packet is given ap- the trace of which can be written proximately by the wavelength in Einstein's photoelectric 2πG Λ = (T + 2R); (11) relation, c4 λ = 2π=m; (4) where Λ denotes the cosmological constant. The equations of motion for the fields themselves follow for particle energy m. from similar variation of their degrees of freedom, δφi: All physical systems fall between these two relations. δS/δφ = 0: (12) At the Planck scale, a black hole is the same size as a i single quantum of the same energy. In a standard ge- This variational formulation leads to equations of mo- ometry, systems can exist with smaller mass, but they tion for any degrees of freedom, whether or not they are cannot have a smaller size (see Figure 1). \fundamental". 3 C. Theories of Emergent Geometry space-time system is defined by the \local Rindler hori- zons of P", a set of sheets in all null directions from P. The theory above is classical. For example, Eq. (11) According to standard thermodynamic principles, a sys- is an exact relationship between scalar quantities, each tem in equilibrium, the most probable macroscopic state, of which has definite value at each event. In reality, it obeys is known that matter is actually a quantum system, so δQ = T dS: (13) T (xµ) is only a classical approximation for a system in which both information and energy are not localized. At Here, δQ denotes a heat flow carried by matter across some level, the same must be true of both Λ and R. the local Rindler horizon H, T denotes the Unruh tem- For matter, there is a consistent quantized theory of perature for the same horizon, and dS / δA denotes the fields φ , the Standard Model, that agrees with micro- i variation of entropy associated with the areal variation scopic experiments[2].