Intelligence Primer (Release 1) Andrew N. Sloss Karl F. Fezer Arm Inc. Arm Inc. [email protected] [email protected] August 19, 2020 Abstract This primer explores the exciting subject of intelligence. Intelligence is a fundamental com- ponent of all living things, as well as Artificial Intelligence (AI). Artificial Intelligence has the potential to affect all of our lives and a new era for modern humans. This paper is an attempt to explore the ideas associated with intelligence, and by doing so understand the implications, constraints, and potentially the capabilities of future Artificial Intelligence. As an exploration, we journey into different parts of intelligence that appear essential. We hope that people find this useful in determining where Artificial Intelligence may be headed. Also, during the exploration, we hope to create new thought-provoking questions. Intelligence is not a single weighable quantity but a subject that spans Biology, Physics, Philosophy, Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, Psychology, and Computer Science. Historian Yuval Noah Harari pointed out that engineers and scientists in the future will have to broaden their understandings to include disciplines such as Psychology, Philosophy, and Ethics. Fiction writers have long portrayed engineers and scientists as deficient in these areas. Today, modern society, the emergence of Artificial Intelligence, and legal requirements all act as forcing functions to push these broader subjects into the foreground. We start with an introduction to intelligence and move quickly onto more profound thoughts and ideas. We call this a Life, the Universe and Everything [2] primer, after the famous science fiction book by Douglas Adams. Forty-two may very well be the right answer, but what are the questions? 1 Introduction arXiv:2008.07324v2 [cs.AI] 18 Aug 2020 We start with an introduction to human intelligence as we currently understand it and move on to an exploration of artificial intelligence. This section starts by covering the complexities of defining intelligence and ends with the fundamental mathematical concepts associated with Artificial Intelligence. Think of these subjects as a level down from the title, as-in distinctly different ideas but universally connected. The biochemist Efraim Racker eloquently put it “anyone who is not thoroughly confused just doesn’t understand the subject”. Intelligence is complicated and not in a small way. We suffer from introspection where the system under study and the observer are one of the same. There is a long history of debate (probably unsettled) about whether it is truly impossible for a system under study to be completely and self-consistently understood. This introspection causes inherent hubris when it comes to intelligence. We will travel from the world of total confusion, see Figure 1, to playing with some wrong numbers, and in the process, hopefully, transfer some exciting thoughts. As discussed, intelligence is a complex subject due to our very own deep involvement. To help put this into perspective, we use a concept introduced by Plato in his work called The Republic 1 Figure 1: Words associated with intelligence (514a−520a). This concept is called Plato’s Cave [35], see Figure 2. The scene, outlined in the concept, describes a cave, with a set of prisoners. Each prisoner’s existence involves facing forward in one direction, distanced apart, shackled to one another, and with no communication. Behind them, shines a bright candle. From their perspective, the entire world consists of silhouettes of themselves. Meaning their world, and realization of self is both narrow and distorted as viewed by people outside the cave. Intelligence suffers from the very same problem since we are considering the subject from our perspective, with our tools. We do not have the luxury of viewing intelligence from an outside perspective and are forced to rely on introspection. When we discuss intelligence, what are we trying to understand? Is it finding the purpose of intelligence? What components make up intelligence? How can it be applied? Discover the limitations? Measure the capability? How to build it? Or even, how to control it? Each question is essential and complicated. But the question we try to cover first is : why we should care?. Why should we care? Apart from the fact that intelligence strengthens survival, it also empowers humans to handle abstract problems. One such problem is “why has something occurred?”, explaining the cause of 2 Figure 2: Plato’s Cave by Rex St. John (January, 2020) a situation. We will discuss the concept of cause and effect throughout this primer, as it touches on many ideas associated with intelligence. Another reason to care is that artificial versions can augment or even replace our intelligence, e.g., extend our sensory capabilities such as eyesight, hearing, and data processing. We can use intelligence to push the boundaries of knowledge and exploration. Lastly, in theory, with greater capability comes resilience, higher reliability, and, hopefully, better decision making. Creativity Creativity is the capacity to understand a problem space and produce a novel solution. If intelligence were solely about carrying out a set of tasks, then we would have already created the most advanced intelligent systems. Even with traditional rule-based systems, we can effectively repeat complicated tasks. The challenge is handling new problems and new situations. Handling new situations is why creativity comes into the equation. It is one of the significant attributes which sets animal species apart from one another. It is also how we solve new problems which are either fully or partially visible. Creativity can be in many forms: playing football, painting, composing music, solving mathe- 3 matical equations, or designing new User Interfaces. The list is endless. There are many cultural and social aspects associated with creativity. An essential factor is that it moves humans beyond the primary survival objectives to other subjects such as art, music, and aesthetics. In other words, the secondary reasons, not just the primary goals of life, are sought. It is arguable whether or not creativity exists in other animals. For example, is a bird song creative? Is it an expression of bird-self? Or is it simply a prescribed sequence of musical notes that a bird uses to maximize its chances to mate? Does a bird song purely satisfy a functional purpose of maximizing the effect of mating or mimicking? Are humans alone in creativity? What is creativity? Margaret Boden, a Research Professor of Cognitive Science, broke down creativity into three useful mechanisms [4], namely exploration - playing within the rules, combi- nation - applying one set of rules to another domain, and transformation - rewriting the rules by removing a critical constraint. For intelligence, exploration creativity is risk-averse and limited, and at the other end of the scale, transformation has the highest risk with potential novelty. Humans can achieve all three levels. By contrast, current Artificial Intelligence struggles with anything beyond exploratory, it never ventures beyond the original programming. If Artificial Intelligence is going to be part of our society, does it need to be creative? Do we want it to be creative? For now, creativity serves as a distinct difference between human-level intelligence and machine intelligence. Are we living in a trusted simulator? Are we? Maybe. Rene Descartes (circa 1637) struggled with this question and went to enormous lengths to create an answer, culminating in the famous line, from Discourse on Method, “Cogito, ergo sum”, or translated to “I think, therefore I am”. Regardless of the answer to the question, intelligence plays the same role in both the real and the simulated. Everything in the world can be replaced by a simulation and the underlying decision processes of the individual would remain unchanged. Simulation is critical if we want to mimic intelligence. We will return to this subject in both Sections 8 & 11 on Consciousness and the Wrong Numbers. The only thing we can trust is our ability to think, everything else (the inputs from our environ- ment) must be considered untrustworthy. This places skepticism into the forefront of intelligence. In the field of Artificial Intelligence skepticism is a useful quality, and it encourages the developer to reduce potential errors by having more sensors, either of different types or the same type, to reduce the concerns and potential errors. Simultaneous correlation of disperse sensors is one of the best reasons for the Internet of Things (IoT). Alan M. Turing Alan Turing has been a significant contributor in our understanding of both natural and Artificial Intelligence. He covered basic fundamental operations of computing, provided a measurement for intelligence and described his ideas on how to build said intelligence. On the fundamental operations of computing, he devised what is commonly called the Turing Machine (TM), where digital computation is a small set of essential functions. It is also worth mentioning biological organisms possibly use a variant of the Turing Machine called a Random Access Machine (or RAM). The significant difference between Turing Machines and Random Access Machines is that a RAM-based system can access arbitrary tape locations. Turing Machines can convert to Random Access Machines, but this is not bidirectional; not all Random Access Machines convert to a Turing Machine. Also, it is worth noting that in biology the hardware is numerous 4 and software is the same, whereas in digital computers the hardware tends to be limited and the software is different. In Computing machinery and intelligence [41], released in 1950, Turing explored the idea of creating Artificial Intelligence. He determined that a system will require an ability to make er- rors/mistakes, i.e., allow for creativity, and must include, as a critical component, some form of randomness. Finally, Turing envisaged a test that can gauge whether Artificial Intelligence has been achieved, either by a system mimicking intelligence or a system with intelligence.