Are Echinocandins Equal?

Are Echinocandins Equal?

Are Echinocandins Equal? Daniel H. Kett, M.D. Professor of Clinical Medicine University of Miami School of Medicine Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Potential Conflicts of Interests • Research Grants – Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality – Akers Bioscience, Inc. – Pfizer, Inc. • Scientific Advisory Boards – Pfizer, Inc. – Cadence Pharmaceuticals – Kimberly Clark • Consult – Pfizer, Inc. • Amphotericin B IV, nephrotoxic – AmB deoxycholate (Fungizone) – ABLC (Abelcet) – Liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome) • Azoles – Fluconazole (Diflucan) PO/IV, hepatotoxic – Voriconazole (Vfend) PO/IV, hepatotoxic, CNS • Echinocandins – Caspofungin (Cancidas) IV – Micafungin (Mycamine) IV – Anidulafungin (Eraxis/Ecalta) IV Are Echinocandins Equal? • All three echinocandins: • Inhibit fungal growth through a non-competitive inhibition of 1,3-β-D-glucan synthase • Share a similar structural chemical backbone • IDSA and ESCMIS guidelines do not differentiate between the three available echinocandins • The only head to head randomized study in Invasive Candidiasis showed non-inferiority between Caspofungin and Micafungin. Echinocandins Pharmacodynamics Pharmacokinetics • Concentration- – Loading dose Anidulafungin dependent killing • ANID: 200 mg • Prolonged post- • CASPO: 70 mg antifungal effects • MICA: none • AUC/MIC and required C /MIC predictive max – Dosing is daily via IV indices Caspofungin infusion • Candida pharmaco- • ANID: 100 mg dynamic targets similar among • CASPO: 50 mg echinocandins and • MICA: 50/100 mg Candida sp – Tissue penetration • AUC/MIC target=10-20 • No active drug in Micafungin • Cmax/MIC target = 1-3 urinary tract, CSF, vitreous Micafungin and Liver Tumours • Micafungin is used in babies, children and adults in the following situations: • To treat invasive candidiasis (a type of fungal infection caused by a yeast-like fungus called Candida). ‘Invasive’ means that the fungus has spread into tissue and blood vessels • To prevent infection with Candida in patients who are having a bone marrow transplant or who are expected to have neutropenia (low levels of neutrophils, a type of white blood cell) for 10 days or more. • Mycamine is also used to treat candidiasis in the oesophagus (gullet) in patients over 16 years of age for whom intravenous treatment is suitable. Because of a possible risk of liver tumours, Mycamine is only to be used if other antifungal medicines are not appropriate. Anidulafungin: Dosage and Administration • Original Formulation: Reconstitution with companion diluent – 20% (w/w) Dehydrated Alcohol in Water for Injection • New USA and European formulation: 100mg lyophilized vial (stored at 5o C) – Reconstitute with 30 mL SWFI – Further dilute with 100 mL of either D5W or NS – Total volume approximately 130 mL – To be administered over 1.5 hrs (at a rate not exceeding 1.1 mg/min) – Reconstituted solution stable for 1 hr under refrigeration – (2-8 degrees C) – Diluted solution stable for up to 24 hrs under refrigeration – (2-8 degrees C) and must be used within 24 hrs. Are Echinocandins Clinically Equivalent? • Activity of the three echinocadins against Candida spp. – MICs – Paradoxical growth – Activity against biofilms • Pharmacology – Pharmacokinteics – Drug-drug interactions • Aspergillus activity • My assessment: – The differences between the echinocandins are real – How these difference impact patient care and results depends on the population being treated and your clinical practice. Echinocandins Invasive Candidiasis Studies (End Points and Success Rates) Efficacy Success Rate Overall Study Design End Point (cured + improved) Mortality Primary: Mora-Duarte Caspofungin vs. favourable response at end of 73% vs. 62% 34% vs. 30% et al, 2002 Amphotericin B IV therapy only (MITT) Primary: 87% vs. 90% Micafungin vs. favourable response at end of Kuse et al, Limposomal therapy (per protocol) 40% vs. 40% 2007 Amphotericin B MITT 69% vs. 74% Primary: Pappas et al, Micafungin (100,150 mg) 29% vs. 33% favourable response at end of 76% vs.71% vs. 72% 2007 vs. Caspofungin vs. 26% IV therapy (MITT) Primary: Reboli et al, Anidulafugin vs. favourable response at end of 76% vs. 60%* 23% vs. 33% 2007 Fluconazole IV therapy (MITT) * (p < 0.05) Defining Success • Clinical Success – Favorable clinical response: • Complete resolution of signs and symptoms attributable to the invasive mycoses – Favorable microbiological response: • Eradication from follow-up cultures (“presumptive eradication” permitted for non-blood cases if there was no apparent evidence of residual infection from symptoms, physical exam, or radiographic studies) • Mortality – Secondary endpoint Micafungin vs. Caspofungin: Invasive Candidiasis 595 patients In the 100 Mica 100 MITT population: 76.4 Mica 150 80 71.4 72.3 Caspo 70/50 191 pts micafungin 100 mg 199 pts micafungin 150 mg 60 188 pts caspofungin 70/50 mg. 40 33.2 29.0 26.4 10 days of intravenous therapy was required. 20 0 Treatment Success Mortality Pappas PG, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45:883-893. Antifungal Susceptibility of 2,000 Bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States MIC90 (in µg/mL), by antifungal agent No. of Candida species isolates FLU VOR AFG CFG MFG C. albicans 733 2 0.06 0.03 0.5 0.03 C. glabrata 458 32 1 0.13 1 0.06 C. parapsilosis 391 2 0.06 2 2 2 C. tropicalis 307 16 2 0.13 1 0.06 C. krusei 50 >64 1 0.13 2 0.25 C. lusitaniae 20 2 0.06 0.25 2 2 C. dubliniensis 19 0.5 0.03 0.06 0.5 0.03 C. guilliermondii 9 4 0.06 1 1 0.5 Ostrosky-Zeichner L, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47:3149–54 Antifungal Susceptibility of 5346 Invasive Isolates of Candida: Six Years of Global Surveillance No. of Cumulative % of isolates susceptible at a MIC (μg/ml) ofa: Organism Agent isolates 0.007 0.015 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 ≥8 Albicans 2,869 ANID 6.2 33.5 69.5 92.4 99.1 99.5 99.5 99.6 100.0 CASPO 1.7 26.7 74.2 97.1 99.3 99.9 100.0 MICA 11.9 80.6 96.4 99.3 99.4 99.5 99.6 100.0 Parapsilosis 759 ANID 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.4 4.7 27.9 92.5 100.0 CASPO 0.1 0.5 3.3 10.7 52.2 89.5 98.6 99.9 100.0 MICA 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 6.1 24.4 79.3 100.0 Glabrata 747 ANID 0.4 7.8 62.4 93.6 99.4 99.7 99.9 99.9 100.0 CASPO 7.0 65.2 95.3 98.4 99.2 99.7 99.9 99.9 99.9 100.0 MICA 13.7 91.4 97.9 98.9 99.5 99.9 99.9 100.0 Tropicalis 625 ANID 3.2 24.2 75.7 95.0 98.4 99.4 99.5 99.5 100.0 CASPO 1.3 31.0 79.7 97.3 99.0 99.7 99.7 99.8 99.8 99.8 100.0 MICA 4.0 39.5 77.6 96.3 98.6 99.5 99.7 100.0 Krusei 136 ANID 2.9 47.1 90.4 99.3 99.3 100.0 CASPO 0.7 0.7 41.9 75.7 94.9 99.3 100.0 MICA 2.2 13.2 85.3 96.3 100.0 Guilliermondii 61 ANID 3.3 6.6 13.1 57.4 90.2 100.0 CASPO 1.6 4.9 11.5 39.3 80.3 95.1 95.1 95.1 100.0 MICA 3.3 3.3 6.6 11.5 21.3 65.6 98.4 100.0 Lusitaniae 58 ANID 1.7 13.8 43.1 96.6 100.0 CASPO 3.4 6.9 44.8 89.7 96.6 100.0 MICA 1.7 8.6 63.8 96.6 98.3 100.0 Pfaller MA et al. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008; 46:150-156 Candida Bloodstream Infections: SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program: 2008-2009 Percent Resistant Species ANID CASP MICA FLUC VORI C. albicans ICU 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0 0.0 (n=393) non-ICU 0.0 0.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 C. glabrata ICU 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 5.9% 5.9% (n=136) non-ICU 3.4% 3.4% 1.7% 6.3% 2.3% C. parapsilosis ICU 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.8% 0.0 (n=118) non-ICU 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3% 0.0 C. tropicalis ICU 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9% 0.0 (n=82) non-ICU 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2% 1.1% C. krusei ICU 0.0 6.3% 0.0 N/A 0.0 (n=16) non-ICU 0.0 5.0% 0.0 N/A 0.0 Pfaller MA , et al . Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011; 38:65-69 Paradoxical Growth Effects of the Echinocandins: Eagle Effect • Eagle effect or paradoxical growth effect: When Candida spp. are grown in media containing high concentrations of antifungal agents, the result can be a reduced activity of these agents against certain organisms. • Species related and echinocandin specific Candida species Paradoxical efffect (%) Drug Paradoxical efffect (%) (no. of isolates) CASPO MICA ANID ANID None of the isolates C. albicans (20) 60 0 40 C. dubliniensis isolates (90%) CASPO C. parapsilosis (10) 90 0 0 C. albicans isolates (14%) C. tropicalis (10) 40 70 20 MICA C. dubliniensis isolates (63%) C. krusei (10) 10 60 0 C. glabrata (10) 0 0 0 Chamolis G, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007. Fleischhacker M, et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol 51:2257-2259 Infect Dis. 2008. 27:127-131 Catheters and Biofilms • Lines and foreign bodies – Remove if possible - better outcomes – Biofilms are important • Fluconazole and voriconazole were ineffective against biofilms of all five L-AMB and Echinocandins Candida species, with none of the isolates showing an azole SMIC of <128 μg/ml.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    27 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us