And Two-Neutron Separation Energies for Neutron-Rich Copper Isotopes *

And Two-Neutron Separation Energies for Neutron-Rich Copper Isotopes *

Chinese Physics C Vol. 41, No. 9 (2017) 094001 Experimental determination of one- and two-neutron separation energies for neutron-rich copper isotopes * Mian Yu(u)1;2 Hui-Ling Wei(¦ )1 Yi-Dan Song(yû)1 Chun-Wang Ma(êS!)1;3;1) 1 Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China 2 School of Biomedical Engineering, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003, China 3 Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China Abstract: A method is proposed to determine the one-neutron Sn or two-neutron S2n separation energy of neutron- rich isotopes. Relationships between Sn (S2n) and isotopic cross sections have been deduced from an empirical formula, i.e., the cross section of an isotope exponentially depends on the average binding energy per nucleon B=A. The proposed relationships have been verified using the neutron-rich copper isotopes measured in the 64A MeV 86Kr 9 77;78;79 + Be reaction. Sn, S2n, and B=A for the very neutron-rich Cu isotopes are determined from the proposed correlations. It is also proposed that the correlations between Sn, S2n and isotopic cross sections can be used to find the location of neutron drip line isotopes. Keywords: neutron separation energy, neutron-drip line, neutron-rich isotope PACS: 21.65.Cd, 25.70.Pq, 25.70.Mn DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/9/094001 1 Introduction of rare isotopes in projectile fragmentation and spalla- tion reactions. Besides the evaluation of binding energy The rare isotopes, including the very neutron-rich iso- and separation energy for rare isotopes, many theoret- topes and the very proton-rich ones, which are near the ical methods have been developed to predict the bind- neutron and proton drip lines, consistently attract the ing energy of rare isotopes by extending the basic mass interest of both theoretical and experimental scientists. formula, for example, the macroscopic-microscopic ap- Indicated by the easy separation of neutrons, isotopes proach [6], the Weizs¨acker-Skyrme formula [7{10], and near the neutron drip line have very small one-neutron the improved J¨anecke mass formula [11]. Some empir- separation energy (Sn) or two-neutron separation energy ical formulas have also been found via the correlation (S2n), which means that the one or two neutrons can between the yield of fragments and their free energy or be removed from the nucleus quite smoothly. The same binding energy [12{14]. In this paper, a method is pro- happens in the one-proton separation energy (Sp) or two- posed to determine the binding energies Sn and S2n from proton separation energy (S2p) for isotopes near the pro- isotopic yield. ton drip line. New facilities for radioactive ion beams make it possible to search for the location of the neu- 2 Formulism tron drip line. Besides the ∼3000 isotopes which have been found experimentally [1], most isotopes near the Tsang et al have proposed a method to determine B drip lines are only theoretically predicted to exist [2]. for the very neutron-rich copper isotopes, for which the These rare isotopes near the drip lines test the limits isotopic distribution depends exponentially on the aver- of both radioactive ion beam facilities and detector sys- age binding energy per nucleon [12, 15], tems, since they have very low production probabilities in experiments. Thus it is always important to estimate σ=Cexp[(B0−8)/τ]; (1) the production of rare isotopes in experiments. Em- 0 pirical parameterizations including epax3 [3], fracs [4] where B =(B−"p)=A, with "p being the pairing energy. (which is an improved version of epax3), and spacs [5], C and τ are free parameters. "p is introduced to mini- etc., have been developed to estimate the cross sections mize the odd-even staggering in the isotopic distribution, Received 27 May 2017 ∗ Supported by Program for Science and Technology Innovation Talents at Universities of Henan Province (13HASTIT046), Natural and Science Foundation in Henan Province (162300410179), Program for the Excellent Youth at Henan Normal University (154100510007) and Y-D Song thanks the support from the Creative Experimental Project of National Undergraduate Students (CEPNU 201510476017) 1) E-mail: [email protected] ©2017 Chinese Physical Society and the Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Modern Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd 094001-1 Chinese Physics C Vol. 41, No. 9 (2017) 094001 which is: the uncertainties, predicted by experimental Sn and S2n, adopt the prediction technique; S or S and the uncer- " =0:5[(−1)N +(−1)Z]"·A−3=4: (2) n 2n p tainties are determined from the cross section using the "= 30 MeV is adopted, as done in Ref. [12]. For an iso- reverse prediction technique based on the least squares tope with charge and mass numbers (Z;A), taking the method [16]. logarithm of Eq. (1) and multiplying by A, one has: Alnσ(Z;A) =AlnC+[B(Z;A)−"p(Z;A)−8A]/τ; (3) where (Z;A) is used as an index to indicate the isotope. For the isotope (Z;A−1), i.e., one neutron removed from the isotope (Z;A), (A−1)lnσ(Z;A−1) =(A−1)lnC +[B(Z;A−1)−"p(Z;A−1)−8(A−1)]/τ; (4) (A−2)lnσ(Z;A−2) =(A−2)lnC +[B(Z;A−2)−"p(Z;A−2)−8(A−2)]/τ: (5) Combining Eqs. (3) and (4), for the isotope (Z;A−1), i.e., one neutron removed from the isotope (Z;A), Alnσ(Z;A)−(A−1)lnσ(Z;A−1) =lnC+[B(Z;A)−B(Z;A−1)−"p(Z;A)+"p(Z;A−1)−8]/τ: (6) Fig. 1. (color online) The correlation between Similarly, combining Eqs. (3) and (5), for the isotope σ(−n) and S0 for the measured isotopes in the (Z;A−2), i.e., two neutrons removed from the isotope (Z;A) n 64A MeV 86Kr + 9Be reaction. The circles de- (Z;A), 0 note Sn and are calculated from the measured Sn Alnσ(Z;A)−(A−2)lnσ(Z;A−2) in AME16 [2]. The line denotes the fitting to the σ(−n) and S0 correlation for the measured =2lnC+[B(Z;A)−B(Z;A−2)−"p(Z;A)+"p(Z;A−2)−16]/τ: (Z;A) n results according to Eq. (10). The full squares (7) (−n) denote the calculated σ(Z;A) using the fitting func- The definitions of one-neutron separation energy and tion and the 0experimental Sn. The open squares two-neutron separation energy for an isotope are: denote the Sn predicted from the fitting function (−n) by σ with no measured Sn in AME16. (Z;A) − (Z;A) Sn =B(Z;A) B(Z;A−1) (8) and (Z;A) − S2n =B(Z;A) B(Z;A−2); (9) The cross sections for the neutron-rich copper iso- topes in the 64 MeV/u 86Kr + 9Be reaction [12], which respectively. The definitions of S and S in relation n 2n were measured at RIKEN by Tsang et al, are adopted to to binding energy are the same as those in relation to perform the analysis. The values for C and τ have been atomic mass [2]. Inserting Eq. (8) into (6), with the × −15 (−n) ≡ − − determined to be C = 2.17 10 mb and τ = 0.0213 definition of σ(Z;A) Alnσ(Z;A) (A 1)lnσ(Z;A−1), one has MeV [12]. The results of Sn and S2n for the copper iso- (−n) (Z;A)− − topes in the new version of the Atomic Mass Evaluation σ(Z;A) =lnC+[Sn "p(Z;A)+"p(Z;A−1) 8]/τ; (10) (−n) (AME16) [2] are adopted. The correlation between σ(Z;A) Similarly, inserting Eq. (9) into (7), with the definition and S0 for the neutron rich copper isotopes is plotted in (−2n) ≡ − − n of σ(Z;A) Alnσ(Z;A) (A 2)lnσ(Z;A−2), one has Fig. 1, from which a quite a good linear correlation can (−n) 0 (−2n) (Z;A) be found. The fitting to the σ and S correlation σ =2lnC+[S −" +" −16]/τ; (11) (Z;A) n (Z;A) 2n p(Z;A) p(Z;A−2) yields C = 3.81 × 10−18 mb and τ = 0.0225 MeV. The 0 ≡ (Z;A) − For simplification, Sn Sn "p(Z;A) +"p(Z;A−1) and fitted τ is similar to that in Ref. [12], while C is much 0 ≡ (Z;A) − smaller than that in Ref. [12]. The correlation between S2n S2n "p(Z;A) +"p(Z;A−2) are defined. By Eqs. σ(−2n) and S0 for the copper isotopes is plotted in Fig. (6), (7), (10), and (11), σ, B, or Sn (S2n) can be pre- (Z;A) 2n dicted from each other based on known parameters. The 2, showing that it obeys the theoretical prediction much (−n) 0 parameters C and τ in this work are determined using better than σ(Z;A) and Sn. Meanwhile, the odd-even stag- (−n) the least squares method. The cross sections, as well as gering is less obvious compared to σ(Z;A). 094001-2 Chinese Physics C Vol. 41, No. 9 (2017) 094001 experimental data in AME16 [2]. It can be seen that Sn obtained by Eq. (8) is very similar to the AME16 data. Sn obtained by Eq. (10) is very close to the AME16 data except for some isotopes which deviate from the fitting line. The largest difference between Sn from Eq.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us