Identification of Cephalopod Species from the North and Baltic Seas

Identification of Cephalopod Species from the North and Baltic Seas

Helgol Mar Res (2015) 69:259–271 DOI 10.1007/s10152-015-0434-7 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Identification of cephalopod species from the North and Baltic Seas using morphology, COI and 18S rDNA sequences 1 2 Katharina Gebhardt • Thomas Knebelsberger Received: 10 October 2014 / Revised: 14 April 2015 / Accepted: 20 April 2015 / Published online: 5 May 2015 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and AWI 2015 Abstract We morphologically analyzed 79 cephalopod represented by a single species, at least in the North Sea. It specimens from the North and Baltic Seas belonging to 13 remained unclear whether this species is A. subulata or A. separate species. Another 29 specimens showed morpho- media. All COI sequences including important metadata logical features of either Alloteuthis mediaor Alloteuthis were uploaded to the Barcode of Life Data Systems and subulata or were found to be in between. Reliable identi- can be used as reference library for the molecular identi- fication features to distinguish between A. media and A. fication of more than 50 % of the cephalopod fauna known subulata are currently not available. The analysis of the from the North and Baltic Seas. DNA barcoding region of the COI gene revealed in- traspecific distances (uncorrected p) ranging from 0 to Keywords Cephalopoda Á Species identification Á 2.13 % (average 0.1 %) and interspecific distances be- Morphology Á DNA barcoding Á mtDNA Á 18S rDNA tween 3.31 and 22 % (average 15.52 %). All species formed monophyletic clusters in a neighbor-joining ana- lysis and were supported by bootstrap values of C99 %. All Introduction COI haplotypes belonging to the 29 Alloteuthis specimens were grouped in one cluster. Neither COI nor 18S rDNA Cephalopods play a significant role in marine ecosystems, sequences helped to distinguish between the different Al- both as consumers and as prey (Hastie et al. 2009). Ap- loteuthis morphotypes. For species identification purposes, proximately 30 cephalopod species have been recorded in we recommend the use of COI, as it showed higher boot- the northeastern Atlantic and adjacent waters, including 18 strap support of species clusters and less amplification and squids (Teuthida), seven bobtail squids (Sepiolida), three sequencing failure compared to 18S. Our data strongly cuttlefish (Sepiida) and 10 octopuses (Octopoda) (Hastie support the assumption that the genus Alloteuthis is only et al. 2009). Some of these are of economic and commer- cial interest, such as Eledone cirrhosa Lamarck, 1798, Loligo vulgaris Lamarck, 1798, Loligo forbesii Steenstrup, Communicated by H.-D. Franke. 1857, Todarodes sagitattus Lamarck, 1798, Illex coindetii Electronic supplementary material The online version of this Ve´rany, 1839 and Todaropsis eblanae Ball, 1841 (Hastie article (doi:10.1007/s10152-015-0434-7) contains supplementary et al. 2009). The identification of cephalopod species is material, which is available to authorized users. traditionally based on the examination of morphological & Thomas Knebelsberger features using identification keys or species descriptions. [email protected] Two groups of North Sea cephalopods are especially 1 challenging concerning morphological identification; these Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, are the Sepiolida, which are likely misidentified due to Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Carl-von- Ossietzky-Straße 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany their small size and physical resemblance (Groenenberg et al. 2009; Goud and De Heij 2012) and the squids of the 2 Senckenberg am Meer, German Center for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Su¨dstrand 44, genus Alloteuthis, namely Alloteuthis subulata Lamarck, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany 1798 and Alloteuthis media Linnaeus, 1758. The latter two 123 260 Helgol Mar Res (2015) 69:259–271 lack confident distinguishing features, questioning their relatively easy to amplify (Hillis and Dixon 1991). The 18S taxonomic status as different species (Anderson et al. 2008; rDNA fulfills the same function in every species and is thus Laptikhovsky et al. 2002). exposed to similar selective forces in all organisms, Where morphological differentiation of species is diffi- evolving at a comparably similar rate (Moore and Steitz cult, molecular data might lead to new conclusions. In this 2002). context, a defined region of the cytochrome c oxidase The success of a worldwide species identification system subunit I (COI) gene has been designated to serve as ‘‘DNA based on DNA barcodes is dependent on the availability and barcode’’ for species identification, as intraspecific vari- quality of barcode reference libraries. In this context, an ability is considerably lower than the distance to the nearest open-access informatics workbench, the Barcode of Life relative among most species (Hebert et al. 2003a, b). The Data Systems (BOLD, http://www.boldsystems.org/), was explicit divergence between intra- and interspecific genetic launched in 2007 (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007). The distances (barcoding gap) is a quality criterion for bar- development of a DNA barcode database for Cephalopoda coding in general and a measurement for the accuracy of was first proposed at the cephalopod international advisory this method (Hebert et al. 2004). council symposium in 2006 (Strugnell and Lindgren 2007). DNA barcoding of cephalopods has already successfully Currently, 4775 cephalopod barcode sequences belonging been applied to the identification of octopuses and various to 418 different species are recorded on BOLD, represent- other cephalopod species from Asian waters and the ing approximately 40 % of the known cephalopod species. Southern Ocean (Dai et al. 2012; Kaneko et al. 2011; All- This study aimed at establishing a reliable DNA barcode cock et al. 2011; Undheim et al. 2010; Badhe et al. 2013). database of cephalopod species from the North and Baltic So far, barcoding of cephalopods from the North Sea has Seas, based on morphologically identified material. COI focused on bobtail squids (Groenenberg et al. 2009). sequences were uploaded to BOLD for comparison with Furthermore, the analysis of molecular data enables the public data. Additionally, we tested the performance of 18S detection of cryptic diversity. A study on the molecular rDNA sequences as an alternative approach for species phylogeny of Sepiolinae using the mitochondrial cy- identification purposes. tochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) recently discovered cryptic species from the North Sea (Groenenberg et al. 2009). Specimens initially identified as Sepiola atlantica Materials and methods d’Orbigny, 1842 split into two distinct groups, the original S. atlantica and the previously undescribed species Sepiola Sampling tridens De Heij and Goud 2010. Thorough morphological and ecological investigations of S. atlantica and S. tridens A total of 108 cephalopod specimens from the North and revealed consistent differences between these two closely Baltic Seas were examined for this study (Fig. 1, Table related species. S1). Specimens were collected during several cruises of the While COI offers benefits as a genetic marker for spe- Thu¨nen-Institute of Sea Fisheries (Hamburg, Germany) cies identification, it may cause problems in some cases. with the research vessels Solea and Walther Herwig III Introgressive hybridization or incomplete lineage sorting between December 2009 and August 2012. Voucher spe- may lead to haplotype sharing between closely related cimens and tissue samples, as well as DNA extracts, were species (Conflitti et al. 2012; Funk and Omland 2003), as stored by using unique identifiers (MT numbers shown in COI is maternally inherited. Additionally, the analysis of Figs. 4, 5, and Table S1) at the German Center for Marine nuclear copies of mitochondrial DNA (NUMTs) can lead to Biodiversity Research (DZMB; Senckenberg am Meer, an overestimation of species numbers (Song et al. 2008). Wilhelmshaven, Germany). DNA sequences, metadata and As NUMTs contain stop codons, indels or non-synony- specimen images were uploaded to BOLD in the corre- mous mutations, they can easily be detected (Strugnell and sponding project folder ‘‘Barcoding Northeast Atlantic Lindgren 2007). Cephalopoda’’ (BNEAC). All sequences were deposited in In cases where COI fails for species delineation, sup- GenBank under the accession numbers KM517882- plementary markers can be useful. A promising candidate KM517947 (COI) and KP136800-KP136827(18S rDNA). is the 18S rDNA gene. Although 18S is one of the most frequently used markers in phylogenetic studies (e.g., Field Morphological species identification et al. 1988; Aguinaldo et al. 1997; Halanych 2004; Telford et al. 2005), it is also useful for species identification For morphological a priori identification, electronic and purposes (Raupach et al. 2010). The high amount of 18S printed identification keys (Hayward and Ryland 1995; rDNA in eukaryotic cells and the highly conserved flanking Marine Species Identification portal http://species-identifi regions, that allow the use of universal primers, make it cation.org) and species descriptions (Hastie et al. 2009;De 123 Helgol Mar Res (2015) 69:259–271 261 A B 60° 58° 56° 54° 52° Alloteuthis sp. Illex coindetii Loligo forbesii Todaropsis eblanae Loligo vulgaris Todarodes sagitattus 50° Eledone cirrhosa C D 60° 58° 56° 54° 52° Sepia elegans Sepiola atlantica Sepiola pfefferi Sepietta neglecta Sepiola tridens Sepietta oweniana 50° Rossia macrosoma -10° -5° 0° 5° 10° 15° -5° 0° 5° 10° 15° Scale: 1:17859692 at Latitude 0° Fig. 1 Sampling sites of cephalopods from the North and Baltic

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us