5: FILTRATIONS and CONDITIONING [.03In]

5: FILTRATIONS and CONDITIONING [.03In]

5: FILTRATIONS AND CONDITIONING Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2016 M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 1 / 37 New Features In the case of multi-period market models, we need to deal with two important new features. First, the investors can trade in assets at any specific date t ∈ {0, 1, 2,...,T } where T is the horizon date. Second, the investors can gather information over time, since the fluctuations of asset prices can be observed. We will need to introduce the concept of a self-financing trading strategy. We have to determine how the level of information available to investors evolves over time. The latter aspect leads to the probabilistic concepts of σ-fields and filtrations. M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 2 / 37 Outline We will examine the following issues: 1 Partitions and σ-fields. 2 Filtrations and adapted stochastic processes. 3 Conditional expectation with respect to a partition or a σ-field. 4 Change of a probability measure and the Radon-Nikodym density. M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 3 / 37 PART 1 PARTITIONS AND σ-FIELDS M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 4 / 37 σ-Field The concept of a σ-field can be used to describe the amount of information available at a given moment. Let N = {1, 2,... } be the set of all natural numbers. Definition (σ-Field) A collection F of subsets of Ω is called a σ-field (or a σ-algebra) whenever: 1 Ω ∈ F, c 2 if A ∈ F then A := Ω \ A ∈ F, ∞ 3 if Ai ∈ F for all i ∈ N then i=1 Ai ∈ F. M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 5 / 37 Interpretation of a σ-Field The set of information has to contain all possible states, so that we postulate that Ω belongs to any σ-field. Any set A ∈ F is interpreted as an observed event. If an event A ∈ F is given, that is, some collection of states is given, then the remaining states can also be identified and thus the complement Ac is also an event. The idea of a σ-field is to model a certain level of information. In particular, as the σ-field becomes larger, more and more events can be identified. We will later introduce a concept of an increasing flow of information, formally represented by an ordered (increasing) family of σ-fields. M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 6 / 37 Probability Measure Definition (Probability Measure) A map P : F → [0, 1] is called a probability measure if: 1 P (Ω) = 1, 2 for any sequence Ai, i ∈ N of pairwise disjoint events we have P Ai = P (Ai) . i∈N i∈N The triplet (Ω, F, P) is called a probability space. By convention, the probability of all possibilities is 1 (see 1). Probability should satisfy σ-additivity (see 2) Note that P (∅) = 0 and for an arbitrary event A ∈ F we have P (Ac) = 1 − P (A). M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 7 / 37 Example: σ-Fields Example (5.1) We take Ω= {ω1,ω2,ω3,ω4} and we define the σ-fields: F1 = {∅, Ω} F2 = ∅, Ω, {ω1,ω2} , {ω3} , {ω4} , {ω1,ω2,ω3} , {ω1,ω2,ω4} , {ω3,ω4} Ω F3 = 2 (the class of all subsets of Ω). Note that F1 ⊂F2 ⊂F3, that is, the information increases: F1: no information, except for the set Ω. F2: partial information, since we cannot distinguish between the occurrence of either ω1 or ω2. F3: full information, since {ω1}, {ω2}, {ω3} and {ω4} can be observed. M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 8 / 37 Example: Probability Measure Example (5.1 Continued) We define the probability measure P on the σ-field F2 2 1 1 P ({ω1,ω2})= , P ({ω3})= , P ({ω4})= . 3 6 6 The σ-additivity of P leads to P ({ω1,ω2}∪{ω3}∪{ω4})=1= P (Ω) . Ω Note that P is not yet defined on the σ-field F3 =2 and in fact the extension of P from F2 to F3 is not unique. For any α ∈ [0, 2/3] we may set 2 P ({ω1})= α = − P ({ω2}) . α 3 α M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 9 / 37 Partitions Definition Let I be some index set. Assume that we are given a collection (Bi)i∈I of subsets of Ω. Then the smallest σ-field containing this collection is denoted by σ ((Bi)i∈I ) and is called the σ-field generated by (Bi)i∈I . Definition (Partition) By a partition of Ω, we mean any collection P = (Ai)i∈I of non-empty subsets of Ω such that the sets Ai are pairwise disjoint, that is, Ai ∩ Aj = ∅ whenever i = j and i∈I Ai =Ω. Lemma A partition P = (Ai)i∈I generates a σ-field F if every set A ∈ F can be represented as follows: A = j∈J Aj for some subset J ⊂ I. M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 10 / 37 Partition Associated with a σ-Field Definition (Partition Associated with F) A partition of Ω associated with a σ-field F is a collection of non-empty sets Ai ∈ F for some i ∈ I such that 1 Ω= i∈I Ai. 2 The sets Ai are pairwise disjoint, i.e., Ai ∩ Aj = ∅ for i = j. 3 For each A ∈ F there exists J ⊆ I such that A = i∈J Ai. Lemma For any σ-field F of subsets of a finite state space Ω, a partition associated with this σ-field always exists and is unique. M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 11 / 37 Partition Associated with a σ-Field Further properties of partitions: If Ω is countable then for any σ-field F there exists a unique partition P of Ω associated with F. It is also clear that this partition generates F, so that F = σ(P). The sets Ai in a partition must be smallest, specifically, if F = σ(P) and A ∈ F is such that A ⊆ Ai then A = Ai. The probability of any A ∈ F equals the sum of probabilities of Ais in the partition generating F, specifically, A = Ai ⇒ P (A)= P (Ai) . i∈J i∈J M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 12 / 37 Example: Partition Associated with a σ-Field Example (5.2) Consider the σ-field F2 introduced in Example 5.1. The unique partition associated with F2 is given by P2 = {ω1,ω2} , {ω3} , {ω4} . Define the probabilities 2 1 1 P ({ω ,ω })= , P ({ω })= , P ({ω })= . 1 2 3 3 6 4 6 Then for each event A ∈ F2 the probability of A can be easily evaluated, for instance 5 P ({ω ,ω ,ω })= P ({ω ,ω })+ P ({ω })= . 1 2 4 1 2 4 6 M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 13 / 37 Random Variable Let F be an arbitrary σ-field of subsets of Ω. In the next definition, we do not assume that the sample space is discrete. Definition (F-Measurability) A map X :Ω → R is said to be F-measurable if for every closed interval [a, b] ⊂ R the preimage (i.e. the inverse image) under X belongs to F, that is, X−1([a, b]) := {ω ∈ Ω | X (ω) ∈ [a, b]} ∈ F. Equivalently, for any real number x X−1((−∞,x]) := {ω ∈ Ω | X (ω) ≤ x} ∈ F. If X is F-measurable then X is called a random variable on (Ω, F). M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 14 / 37 Partition and Random Variable Proposition (5.1) Let X :Ω → R be an arbitrary function. Let F be a σ-field and P = (Ai)i∈I be the unique partition associated with F. Then X is F-measurable if and only if for each Ai ∈ P there exists a constant ci such that X maps Ai to {ci}, that is, X (ω)= ci for all ω ∈ Fi. Proof of Proposition 5.1 (⇒). (⇒) Assume that (Ai)i∈I is a partition of the σ-field F and that X is F-measurable. Let j ∈ I be an index and let an element ω ∈ Aj be arbitrary. Define cj := X(ω). We wish to show that X(ω)= cj for all −1 ω ∈ Aj. Since X is F-measurable, X (cj) ∈ F. M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 15 / 37 Proof of Proposition 5.1 Proof of Proposition 5.1 (⇒). By properties 2. and 3. in the definition of a σ-field, we have −1 ∅ = X (cj) ∩ Aj ∈ F. It is obvious that the inclusion −1 X (cj) ∩ Aj ⊂ Aj holds. Therefore, from the aforementioned minimality property of the sets contained in the partition, we obtain −1 X (cj ) ∩ Aj = Aj. But this means that X(ω)= cj for all ω ∈ Aj and thus X is constant on Aj. By varying j, we obtain such cjs for all j ∈ I. M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 5: Filtrations and Conditioning 16 / 37 Proof of Proposition 5.1 Proof of Proposition 5.1 (⇐). (⇐) Assume now that X :Ω → R is a function, which is constant on all sets Aj belonging to the partition and that the cj are given as in the statement of the proposition. Let [a, b] be a closed interval in R. We define C := cj | j ∈ I and cj ∈ [a, b] . Since i∈I Ai =Ω no other elements then the cj occur as values of X. Therefore, −1 −1 −1 X ([a, b]) = X (C)= X (cj)= Aj ∈ F j |cj ∈C j |cj ∈C where the last equality holds by property 3.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    37 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us