Supplementary File For: Inferring Analogous Attributes

Supplementary File For: Inferring Analogous Attributes

Supplementary file for: Inferring Analogous Attributes Chao-Yeh Chen and Kristen Grauman University of Texas at Austin [email protected], [email protected] 1. Inferring analogous attributes with tensor factorization Figure 1 illustrates the tensor W composed of observed classifiers and the desired complete W, which we obtain via the inference procedure described in Sec 3.3 in the paper. Each red rectangle in (a) is a category-sensitive attribute for an K k k k object+attribute combination. Figure 2 illustrates the decomposition W ≈ Pk=1 O ◦ A ◦ C described in Sec 3.3. Note that in Figure 3 of the paper, we use the latent object features O to analyze the analogous attributes. W W Category Category Attribute Attribute (a) The tensor W is composed (b) We infer missing classifiers of classifiers for which we ob- with tensor completion. served training images. Figure 1. The 3D object-attribute tensor W. C1 CK + … + W § A1 AK Category 1 K Attribute O O K k k k Figure 2. Illustration of tensor decomposition in W ≈ Pk=1 O ◦ A ◦ C . 2. Naive category-sensitive attributes As described in Sec 3.1, the naive way to learn category-sensitive attributes is using only in-category examples (i.e., no importance weighting). However, we find this approach is weak in practice since the number of available training examples is often very few. See Table 1 for the comparison. Datasets Trained explicitly # Categ (N) # Attr (M) Category-sensitive (Ours) Universal Category-sensitive (naive) ImageNet 384 25 0.7304 0.7143 0.6388 SUN 280 59 0.6505 0.6343 0.6052 Table 1. Accuracy (mAP) of attribute prediction by our proposed category-sensitive attribute, universal attribute, and the naive category- sensitive attribute. Numbers are mAP over all category and attribute combinations for the 2 datasets. 3. Semantic subsets Figure 3 illustrates the semantic subsets we test in Sec 4.4 of the paper. We first restrict the tensor to closely related objects. Then we restrict it to closely related attributes. Red: restrict the tensor to dog related categories. Blue: restrict the tensor to color related attributes. Dog categories Category Category Color attributes Attribute Figure 3. Illustration of semantic subsets. • Dog related categories: puppy, cur, courser, basset, beagle, bloodhound, bluetick, coonhound, dachshund, foxhound, redbone, wolfhound, whippet, otterhound, Scottish deerhound, staghound, bullterrier, wirehair, Australian terrier, schnauzer, retriever, vizsla, English setter, clumber, Sussex spaniel, kuvasz, schipperke, groenendael, malinois, bri- ard, komondor, collie, pinscher, mastiff, bulldog, Great Dane, Saint Bernard, basenji, pug, keeshond, corgi, poodle. • Color related attributes: black, blue, brown, gray, green, orange, pink, red, violet, white, yellow..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us