REVIEW the Molecular Basis of Insulin

REVIEW the Molecular Basis of Insulin

1 REVIEW The molecular basis of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake: signalling, trafficking and potential drug targets Sophie E Leney and Jeremy M Tavare´ Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK (Correspondence should be addressed to J M Tavare´; Email: [email protected]) Abstract The search for the underlying mechanism through which GLUT4 translocation and will attempt to address the spatial insulin regulates glucose uptake into peripheral tissues has relationship between the signalling and trafficking com- unveiled a highly intricate network of molecules that function ponents of this event. We will also explore the degree to in concert to elicit the redistribution or ‘translocation’ of which components of the insulin signalling and GLUT4 the glucose transporter isoform GLUT4 from intracellular trafficking machinery may serve as potential targets for membranes to the cell surface. Following recent technological the development of orally available insulin mimics for the advances within this field, this review aims to bring together treatment of diabetes mellitus. the key molecular players that are thought to be involved in Journal of Endocrinology (2009) 203, 1–18 Introduction Levine & Goldstein 1958). However, the mechanism by which insulin is able to stimulate glucose uptake was not Glucose homeostasis and diabetes mellitus elucidated until the early 1980s when two independent groups demonstrated that insulin promoted the movement of The ability of insulin to stimulate glucose uptake into muscle and adipose tissue is central to the maintenance of whole- a ‘glucose transport activity’ from an intracellular membrane body glucose homeostasis. Autoimmune destruction of the pool to the plasma membrane (Cushman & Wardzala 1980, pancreatic b-cells results in a lack of insulin production Suzuki & Kono 1980). In 1989, the glucose transporter and the development of type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM). GLUT4 was cloned and shown to be the major isoform Deregulation of insulin action manifests itself as insulin responsible for enhanced glucose uptake into muscle and resistance, a key component of type II diabetes mellitus adipose tissue following the secretion of insulin into the (T2DM). Both forms of diabetes confer an increased risk of bloodstream (Birnbaum 1989, Charron et al. 1989, Fukumoto major lifelong complications. In the case of insulin resistance, et al.1989, James et al.1989, Kaestner et al.1989). this includes a fivefold increased risk of coronary vascular Evidence that GLUT4 redistributes from an intracellular disease. The need for an effective treatment for both forms of membrane pool to the plasma membrane upon insulin diabetes as well as for the development of early detection stimulation has since been confirmed using a variety of methodologies has, therefore, become increasingly import- different methods. These have included subcellular ant. Yet for this to be possible, we must first understand the fractionation (Marette et al. 1992, Pilch et al. 1993, Deems mechanism through which insulin regulates glucose uptake et al.1994), electron and fluorescence microscopy and identify the key molecular players involved. (Voldstedlund et al. 1993), bis-mannose photolabelling of plasma membranes (Calderhead et al. 1990, Holman et al. 1990) and more recently the use of exogenously expressed The insulin-responsive glucose transporter isoform GLUT4 GLUT4 fusion proteins with various epitopes (Czech The effect of insulin on glucose transport into muscle and et al. 1993, Kanai et al. 1993, Dobson et al. 1996, Dawson adipose first became apparent in the 1950s when several et al. 2001). All these methods have consistently demonstra- groups demonstrated that insulin was able to accelerate the ted that in non-stimulated cells, the majority of GLUT4 rate of glucose uptake into these tissues (Park & Johnson 1955, is found within intracellular membranes with !5% of the Journal of Endocrinology (2009) 203, 1–18 DOI: 10.1677/JOE-09-0037 0022–0795/09/0203–001 q 2009 Society for Endocrinology Printed in Great Britain Online version via http://www.endocrinology-journals.org Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/28/2021 07:08:34PM via free access 2 S E LENEY and J M TAVARE´ . Insulin action on glucose uptake total GLUT4 pool present at the plasma membrane. Mechanism of GLUT4 sequestration in the absence of insulin Following insulin stimulation, up to 50% of the total The existence of an insulin-responsive GSV pool to which GLUT4 pool redistributes from its intracellular location to GLUT4 is targeted in the absence of insulin is supported by the plasma membrane. many studies and is widely accepted within the field. However, the mechanism by which GLUT4 is actively Subcellular localisation of GLUT4 retained within this compartment and thereby sequestered away from the plasma membrane in the basal state remains Identifying the nature of the intracellular compartment(s) in controversial. Currently, evidence exists to support two insulin-responsive tissues where GLUT4 resides in the entirely different mechanisms of GLUT4 sequestration. absence of insulin is key to understanding the mechanism Studies in both 3T3-L1 adipocytes (Martin et al. 2006) and through which insulin promotes the redistribution of this rat adipose cells (Satoh et al. 1993, Yang & Holman 1993) GLUT4 pool to the cell surface. Early studies involving the have suggested that GLUT4 is continuously cycled between isolation of GLUT4-containing vesicles identified numerous the plasma membrane and intracellular membrane compart- GLUT4 vesicle resident proteins that were known to localise ments and appears to maintain its intracellular localisation to distinct intracellular compartments, suggesting that through a combination of slow exocytosis and rapid GLUT4 localises to several different membrane pools (Tanner endocytosis. Additional studies in 3T3-L1 adipocytes have & Lienhard 1987, 1989, Kandror & Pilch 1994a,b, 1996, suggested that the slow recycling of GLUT4 is due to a Hanpeter & James 1995, Keller et al. 1995). These dynamic sorting process that involves the continuous budding observations were supported by immunofluorescence and and fusion of GLUT4-containing vesicles between the electron microscopy studies in insulin-responsive tissues, endosomal compartment and the GSVs (Karylowski et al. which demonstrated that GLUT4 is localised within complex 2004). This continuous cycle of ‘release and capture’ is tubulovesicular structures at the perinuclear region of the cell, thought to actively prevent the net recycling of GLUT4 back to small peripheral vesicles in the cytoplasm and to clathrin- to the plasma membrane and may therefore be an important coated pits at the cell surface (Friedman et al. 1991, Slot et al. site of regulation by insulin. This study also supports the 1991, Smith et al. 1991, Bornemann et al. 1992). Colocalisa- hypothesis that GSVs are a post-endosomal pool, a theory tion studies using known protein markers confirmed that formulated based on the observation that the disruption of the GLUT4 localises to numerous intracellular organelles that function of certain proteins (including Rab11 (Zeigerer et al. include the Golgi complex, the trans-Golgi network, 2002), Syntaxin16 (Proctor et al. 2006), EHD1 (Guilherme lysosomes, the late endosomes and the recycling endosomes et al. 2004), Ubc9 (Liu et al. 2007), Syntaxin6 (Perera et al. (Ralston & Ploug 1996). Intriguingly, the predominant 2003) TUG (Yu et al. 2007), Rabip4 (Mari et al. 2006)) leads intracellular GLUT4 pool was found to constitute a subset to the accumulation of GLUT4 within endosomes and of vesicles that display a similar morphology to that of enhanced cell surface levels. Collectively, these observations recycling endosomes yet are biochemically distinct and lack have led to the ‘dynamic retention’ hypothesis in which the common endosomal markers such as the transferrin receptor entire GLUT4 pool is in dynamic equilibrium between the (TfR) and GLUT1 but are enriched in GLUT4, IRAP and cell surface and intracellular compartments. In this model, the v-SNARE VAMP-2 (Malide et al. 1997, Ross et al. 1997). insulin signalling is thought to elicit changes in the rates of This subset of GLUT4 vesicles are often referred to as GLUT4 exocytosis and endocytosis to achieve a new steady- GLUT4 storage vesicles (GSVs) or the specialised GLUT4 state distribution of GLUT4 with up to 50% of the total pool, which form during adipogenesis (for recent reviews on GLUT4 pool present at the plasma membrane. In this model, this topic see (Hou & Pessin 2007, Pilch 2008)). as illustrated in Fig. 1, GLUT4 could translocate to the plasma membrane via either route 1 (direct fusion with the plasma membrane), route 2 (re-entry into a recycling pool) or a combination of both. Regulated GLUT4 trafficking Govers et al. (2004) have proposed an alternative model to explain the intracellular retention of GLUT4. They found How insulin stimulates the net translocation of GLUT4 to that up to 90% of the total GLUT4 pool in 3T3-L1 the plasma membrane has been the subject of intense adipocytes is stored within intracellular compartments that are investigation. To explore this, we will first discuss how not in equilibrium with the cell surface under non-stimulated GLUT4 is sequestered away from the plasma membrane in conditions (Govers et al. 2004). Here, insulin was found to the basal state, and how insulin action may impact on these increase the amount of GLUT4 present within a cycling pool processes.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us