Comparative Depth Distribution of Corallimorpharians and Scleractinians (Cnidaria: Anthozoa)

Comparative Depth Distribution of Corallimorpharians and Scleractinians (Cnidaria: Anthozoa)

Vol. 397: 63–70, 2009 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published December 17 doi: 10.3354/meps08271 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Contribution to the Theme Section ‘Conservation and management of deep-sea corals and coral reefs’ OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Comparative depth distribution of corallimorpharians and scleractinians (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) Daphne G. Fautin1,*, John M. Guinotte2, James C. Orr3 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA 2Marine Conservation Biology Institute, 2122 112th Ave NE, Suite B-300, Bellevue, Washington 98004, USA 3Marine Environment Laboratories (MEL-IAEA), 4, Quai Antoine 1er, MC-98000 Monaco, Monaco ABSTRACT: We assessed whether CaCO3 concentration of seawater may be relevant to the occur- rence of members of Corallimorpharia and Scleractinia, which are very similar except for the posses- sion by scleractinians of a calcareous skeleton. In collections of both the Challenger Deep-sea Expe- dition 1872–1876 and the US Antarctic (Research) Program, average depth of occurrence was significantly greater for corallimorpharians than for scleractinians. We also compared depth of occur- rence relative to the position of the aragonite saturation horizon (ASH) at many localities from which specimens were collected. Nearly 25 and 50% of stations at which scleractinians were collected were below the ASH for the Antarctic and Challenger stations, respectively; 50 and 100% of the Antarctic and Challenger stations at which corallimorpharians were collected were below the ASH, respec- tively. Statistical analyses of these data to test whether there is a difference in the depth, relative to the ASH, at which scleractinians and corallimorpharians occur indicate a difference for the Chal- lenger but not the Antarctic stations; more data are needed. The scleractinians that tolerate living below the ASH belong to a minority of the genera recorded in the surveys, and do not include spe- cies considered important in forming bioherms; those that occur deepest are solitary. Some deep-sea scleractinians may be unaffected by shoaling of the ASH that is predicted across all ocean basins in the near future, some may be confined to water shallower than is now the case, and others may cease producing a skeleton, becoming morphologically indistinguishable from corallimorpharians. KEY WORDS: Corallimorpharia · Scleractinia · Corals · Sea anemones Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION limorpharians with that of deep-sea scleractinians to infer if CaCO3 concentration may be relevant to the Corallimorpharians (order Corallimorpharia) are occurrence of these similar animals. anthozoans morphologically intermediate between sea Corallimorpharia has far fewer members than the 2 anemones (order Actiniaria) and stony corals (order groups to which it is most similar (45 valid species, com- Scleractinia). Like a sea anemone, a corallimorpharian pared with 1632 of Scleractinia and 1069 of Actiniaria; (Fig. 1) lacks a calcareous skeleton, but has internal Fautin 2008). However, like scleractinians and actiniar- morphology and nematocysts like those of a scleractin- ians, corallimorpharians occur in all oceans, from polar ian (den Hartog 1980, Dunn 1982). Given concern that to equatorial latitudes, and from the intertidal to at least changes in seawater chemistry may affect the robust- 5 km in depth (actiniarians occur in the trenches as ness of the skeletons of calcifying organisms or prevent well). Shallow temperate and deep-water corallimor- formation of skeletons entirely (e.g. Orr et al. 2005, pharians at all latitudes resemble scleractinian polyps Kleypas et al. 2006, Guinotte & Fabry 2008), we sought (Fig. 1a), whereas most shallow tropical corallimorphar- to compare the depth distribution of deep-sea coral- ians do not, being leathery in texture with short tenta- *Email: [email protected] © Inter-Research 2009 · www.int-res.com 64 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 397: 63–70, 2009 Fig. 1. (a) A deep-sea corallimorpharian, perhaps Corallimorphus pilatus, at 1798 m (photo from NOAA-HURL Archives, PI Amy Baco-Taylor). (b) A shallow tropical corallimorpharian (photo by G. Miller) cles (Fig. 1b). Cogently, in our experience, people inter- occurrence of members of these taxa is ambiguous. ested in and knowledgeable about deep-sea sclerac- Although some scleractinian species can tolerate living tinians may not recognize deep-sea corallimorpharians. below the ASH, the ones collected deepest in both sur- Currently, Corallimorpharia occupies a rank identical veys were solitary. Guinotte et al. (2006) have shown to that of Actiniaria and Scleractinia, but during the that by the end of the 21st century, water at depths past century it has been proposed (1) that they are re- where 70% of deep-sea bioherm-forming scleractini- ally scleractinians lacking a skeleton and (2) that they ans occur will be undersaturated with respect to arag- belong with actiniarians (summarized by, inter alia, den onite. As a result of this shoaling of the ASH across all Hartog 1980). Most recent molecular evidence supports ocean basins in the immediate future, some scleractini- Corallimorpharia as being separate from but more ans may be confined to water shallower than is now closely related to Scleractinia than to any other antho- the case, and others may cease producing a skeleton. zoan group (Brugler & France 2007, Fukami et al. 2008, Ecosystem structure and function could be altered sub- earlier data summarized by Daly & Fautin 2008). Re- stantially with follow-on effects for organisms that gardless of phylogenetic details, corallimorpharians are depend on cold-water coral bioherms. more closely related to some corals than many of the The number of records suitable for an analysis such groups referred to as ‘corals’ are to one another. Scler- as ours is small. The records we analyzed were from actinia and Corallimorpharia both belong to the antho- surveys not directed toward finding members of either zoan subclass Hexacorallia; some members of the other taxon; data from surveys focused on documenting the anthozoan subclass, Octocorallia, such as those of the occurence of members of one of the taxa could be family Isididae, are referred to as corals (e.g. Thresher biased. We are confident that all corallimorpharians et al. 2009). collected on the 2 surveys were included in the data To test whether deep-sea members of Corallimor- we analyzed. In addition to assessing whether depth of pharia and Scleractinia differ in depth of occurrence, occurrence differs between members of these 2 antho- we compared collection records for members of the zoan groups, an aim of the present study is to stimu- 2 taxa from comprehensive biological surveys that late, by our provisional results, the acquisition of addi- included data for both taxa. For 2 surveys that met our tional data to test further the hypothesis that CaCO3 criteria, we found that, on average, corallimorpharians concentration affects the occurrence of deep-sea scler- occur significantly deeper than scleractinians. Using actinians. data from the model of Orr et al. (2005) for carbonate saturation in seawater, we compared depth of occur- rence with position of the aragonite saturation horizon METHODS (ASH) (the skeleton of a scleractinian is composed of CaCO3 in the crystal form aragonite). The outcome of We acquired occurrence records for scleractinians our analyses concerning whether aragonite saturation and corallimorpharians from 2 biological surveys: the of seawater can explain the difference in depth of Challenger Deep-sea Expedition 1872–1876 (e.g. Fautin et al.: Depth of corallimorpharians and scleractinians 65 Rehbock 1992, Langmuir 2004, Perry & Fautin 2004) Orcadas’. The publication documenting scleractinians and the US Antarctic Research Program (USARP; now was written by Cairns (1982) and that on corallimor- termed the US Antarctic Program) as assembled in the pharians was written by Fautin (1984). online resource ‘Hexacorallians of the World’ (Fautin We compared depth of occurrence for scleractinians 2008). To obtain the data used, on the opening page of versus corallimorpharians collected on the Challenger ‘Hexacorallians of the World’ (http://hercules.kgs. Expedition and under the auspices of the USARP. Our ku.edu/Hexacoral/Anemone2) select ‘Distributional analysis was based solely on presence at a station; we Data,’ then successively select from the list of menus did not consider the number of individuals sampled. ‘Expedition’ and ‘Name.’ When an expedition name is The significance of the differences we found was selected from the pick list or typed into the search box, assessed with the Mann-Whitney U-test, a non-para- a map of the stations for that expedition appears, and a metric statistic equivalent to the parametric t-test. For list of specimens from that expedition can be selected all statistical tests, we accepted as significant p-values to display. Records can be downloaded in XML. less than 5%. In our analyses, we used the names published in the We compared the depth of each station at which at data sources except for the few cases in which the least one specimen was collected to the ASH at that same specimen was referred to a different genus in a location for the subset of stations for which ASH data subsequent publication; in these we referred the spe- were available. Values for ASH depth are based on the cies to the genus in which it was most recently placed. model outputs described by Orr et al. (2005); modeled Although all published records we used are vouchered ASH data are lacking for some enclosed regions, by museum specimens, we did not examine the speci- including the Weddell and Ross Seas. Modeled data mens themselves. are available for the years 1765 and 1994; for the sta- The 50 volumes that constitute the results of the tions where data for both years are available, our Challenger Expedition include 2 chapters on sclerac- results were identical, but we used the 1994 data tinians, one by Moseley (1881) on deep-sea corals and because only they are available for some stations.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us