Marcel Berger Remembered

Marcel Berger Remembered

Marcel Berger Remembered Claude LeBrun, Editor and Translator Gérard Besson EDITOR’S NOTE. Claude LeBrun has kindly assembled this memorial for Marcel Berger. This month also Marcel Berger,1 one of the world’s leading differential marks the conference “Riemannian Geometry Past, geometers and a corresponding member of the French Present and Future: An Homage to Marcel Berger” at Academy of Sciences for half a century, passed away on IHÉS. October 15, 2016, at the age of eighty-nine. Marcel Berger’s contributions to geometry were both broad and deep. The classification of Riemannian holo- nomy groups provided by his thesis has had a lasting impact on areas ranging from theoretical physics to alge- braic geometry. His 1960 proof that a complete oriented even-dimensional manifold with strictly quarter-pinched positive curvature must be a topological sphere is the Claude LeBrun is professor of mathematics at Stony Brook Univer- sity. His email address is [email protected]. Gérard Besson is CNRS Research Director at Institut Fourier, Uni- For permission to reprint this article, please contact: versité Grenoble, France. His email address is g.besson@ujf [email protected]. -grenoble.fr. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/noti1605 1Pronounced bare-ZHAY. December 2017 Notices of the AMS 1285 research director by the CNRS. He served as president of the French Mathematical Society (SMF) during the period of 1979–80 and in this capacity helped oversee the foundation of the International Center for Mathematical Workshops (CIRM) in Luminy. In 1985 he then became director of the Institute for Higher Scientific Studies (IHÉS) in Bures-sur-Yvette, a position in which he served until 1993, when he was succeeded by his former student Jean-Pierre Bourguignon. The mathematical community will remain eternally indebted to Marcel Berger for his marvelous contributions to our mathematical heritage, which have substantially transformed the field of differential geometry. Misha Gromov Marcel Berger, during his directorship (1985–1994) of the IHÉS, in Bures-sur-Yvette, France. Inspired by Marcel Berger: Recollections (1955–1995) There is no need for me to say anything direct ancestor of a vast sector of subsequent research in about Marcel’s famous 1/4-pinching theorem, his global Riemannian geometry. Through his many students discovery of collapse with bounded curvature, and collaborators, he created a school which carried the his contributions and leadership in the field of torch of differential geometry into a new era. Under his spectral geometry, or his classification of special leadership, a group of mathematicians collaborating un- holonomy groups—everybody in our universe3 is der the pseudonym of Arthur L. Besse produced several aware of these. landmark books [1], [19], [20] that inspired a ferment of research activity in connection with key topics of interest: However, it is perhaps worth mentioning that the the study of Riemannian manifolds whose geodesics are last was cited as a source of inspiration by Jim all closed, links between volume and injectivity radius Simons when the Légion d’Honneur was bestowed [11], and the theory of Einstein manifolds [10]. He has on him by the French ambassador in New York. also left us an impressive series of popular and peda- (1972) Systolic Inequalities and Calibrations. In a couple gogical books, as exemplified by his massive treatise A of articles from this period, Marcel proposed a new Panoramic View of Riemannian Geometry [14]. His efforts conceptual (systolic) rendition of Loewner’s early in this last vein also included a campaign to increase the results on surfaces. With characteristic modesty, understanding of the work of Mikhail Gromov. he attributed the idea to René Thom. Born in Paris on April 14, 1927, Berger was a student at the École Normale Supérieure from 1948 until 1953, when In his evaluation of systoles of particular man- he was awarded a research assistantship by the CNRS2 ifolds, I believe Marcel made the very first use after distinguishing himself in a national competition. ever, in the context of quaternionic spaces, of the In 1954, under the supervision of André Lichnerowicz, method of calibrations and proved that he then defended his doctoral thesis, which proved The quaternionic projective subspaces ℍℙ푘 ⊂ ℍℙ푛 a landmark classification of the holonomy groups of are volume minimizing among all 4푘-cycles not Riemannian manifolds. homologous to zero in ℍℙ푛. After spending the academic year 1956–57 at MIT, Berger was promoted to the rank of research scientist by (1978) Blaschke Conjecture for Spheres. If a Riemann- the CNRS. In 1958 he then accepted a junior appointment ian manifold 푋 homeomorphic to 푆푛 has diameter at the University of Strasbourg, where he was eventually equal to its injectivity radius, then 푋 is isometric to promoted to full professor in 1962, shortly after his return a standard “round” (constant-curvature) sphere. from a year in Berkeley. After moving to a professorship Marcel’s dazzlingly simple proof of this (which in Nice for two years, he then moved again in 1966, involves a contribution by Jerry Kazdan, who this time to the University of Paris, which at that time proved a key analytic inequality suggested by was still a single, unified institution. When the university Marcel), hardly takes half a page. was broken into smaller units in the wake of the 1968 student riots, Berger was attached to the University of Paris VII, at Jussieu, and was promoted to the rank of Mikhail Gromov is Jay Gould Professor of Mathematics at the Courant Institute, New York University, and professor emeritus at 2The Centre national de la recherche scientifique is the French Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, France. His email address government’s main agency for the support of fundamental sci- is [email protected]. entific research. Unlike the American NSF, the CNRS supports a 3Here, “our universe” means the “community of differential large network of scientists on a permanent basis. geometers.” 1286 Notices of the AMS Volume 64, Number 11 (1980) Isoembolic Inequality. Among all 푛-dimensional My thesis in 1961 was a direct result of his remarkable manifolds with a given injectivity radius, the round work on holonomy in irreducible Riemannian manifolds, sphere has the least volume. in which he enumerated all possible holonomy groups. These all turned out to be transitive on the unit sphere, (2000?) Buying Cheese in Paris. One day, while a guest which led to the question of how one could prove this at Marcel’s apartment in Paris, I tried a piece of directly without recourse to his list. Such a proof was cheese whose flavor far excelled anything I had provided by my thesis. ever tasted before. When I asked Marcel where this Berger also proved the first cheese came from, he could not hide his surprise pinching theorems in Riemann- at the impudence of my question. ian geometry, proving that This was Of course—he said—it is from Quatrehomme. Do an even-dimensional compact you think we would serve our guests cheese from Riemannian manifold whose seminal work. Dubois? sectional curvature is strictly 1 Please,—I said—what is the name of this cheese, between 4 and 1 is necessarily homeomorphic to the and where is this boutique? I want to go there and sphere and later showing that, if we don’t insist that buy this cheese myself. the inequalities be strict, the only exceptions we’ve now allowed in are just the symmetric spaces of rank 1. This Marcel literally froze, with his mouth open. was seminal work. I showed it to my first student, Jeff Yourself? Are you kidding? Do you imagine that Cheeger, and it inspired him to write an excellent thesis. you will just go to Quatrehomme and buy Pont- Jeff then went on to develop these ideas further, initially l’Évêque??!! alone and later in collaboration with Detlef Gromoll. This illustrates the way that Berger’s ideas quickly led to an im- Why not? What could be complicated about buying portant body of work, relating curvature to the topology cheese? of Riemannian manifolds. Of course, it is simple. But getting good cheese takes time—about a year, maybe, a half-year if Jeff Cheeger you really know how to go about it. Marcel Berger was one of the leading Riemannian geome- By this time, it was my own mouth that was ters of the mid-twentiethth century and for many years agape. Taking pity on my ignorance, Marcel then the dean of French differential geometry. His beautiful explained, contributions to metric geometry, especially those from A respectable cheese has a narrow time window 1955 to 1980, provided a high standard for the period of 3–4 days during which it is good to eat. Only and played a major role in setting the stage for the the proprietor of a boutique knows which of his subject’s next explosive phase of development. A few of cheeses are ripe. If you are a serious customer, he the highlights were the even-dimensional sphere theorem will tell you which cheeses you should buy on a with (sharp) 1/4-pinching, associated results such as the particular day. minimal diameter rigidity theorem (arguably, the first global rigidity theorem), the sphere theorem with pinch- To gain his respect you have to come to the shop ing slightly below 1/4 (via a compactness/contradiction regularly, at least once a week, and buy a couple argument), and his comparison theorem, known as “Rauch kilograms of several cheeses. Besides—and this is II”; for details, see [4], [6], [12], [7]. crucial—you should show some understanding of With hindsight, Berger’s lemma, concerning pairs of cheese. points at maximum distance, to some extent foreshad- Eventually, he will accept you, and then you will owed the Grove–Shiohama–Petersen theory of critical start getting cheeses like the one you have just points of distance functions, which has had a number of tasted.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us