BOOK 15 PAGE 362 WORKSHOP MEETING OF THE BOARD, JULY 2, 1993 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS The meeting was called to order at 9:00 A.M. with the following members present: James L. Gose Carl Cool Archie Summers Louise Graham C. "Guy" Maxcy Jeff Ludwig Doris Gentry Also participating in the Workshop were Rick Lilyquist, County Engineer, Bill Benson, representing the Property Appraiser's office and Doug Leonard of the Central Florida Regional Planning Council. The Chairman relinquished the floor to the County Administrator. 1) County Administrator - slide presentation - "HOW TO DO AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS." See SMB 18 Page 130. 1991 Comprehensive Plan - Sewer and Water, Phase I and Phase II 2) Jeff Ludwig - County Planner - 1991 Comp Plan law of the Land until declared different. 3) Doug Leonard, Central Florida Regional Planning Council, How the Comp Plan works, Growth Management, Agreement on Analysis, Capital Improvement Standpoint, Private Development Actions Impact, What Economic Impact on the County, Objectives - Economic Element, Funding - Special Grants, Urban State and Local Planning Grants. See SMB 18 Page 131. Commissioner Summers arrived at the meeting at 10:30 A. M. PUBLIC INPUT: 1) (a) Jackie Fauls-question to Bill Benson, Property Appraiser's office - Will the Comp Plan devalue property or increase valuation? (b) Proposed Amendments - Cost associated with Planner position, supplies, and vesting (c) Conservation Overlay Map - 93-94, Consultants cost, Plan to date cost (d) How cost will be funded 2) (a) Mark George - Full complete cost and effect of cost base (b) Doug Leonard, Lengthy time to bring Plan into compliance 3) (a) Joe Clark - Leisure Lakes Lots - devalue of property, negative impact - adversely impact community. (b) Doug Leonard - Timing - solutions will develop 4) (a) Greg Harris - Comp Plan Amendments with DCA (b) Doug Leonard - Amendment process shortened (190 to 150 days). Improvement in that area. 5) (a) Vince Woeppel - agrees with Joe Clark's summation. 6) (a) Kris Delaney - Environmental Council - Value of Environment - concerns to Economic Element - 5% Gas Tax appropriate for implementation - Restrict to Transportation Trust Fund. BOOK 15 PAGE 363 7) (a) Mike Johnson - Winding Waters concerns BOARD DISCUSSION: 1) (a) Gose - Tracking mechanism (b) Doug Leonard - Comparisons to existing before and after. EARS update (c) County Administrator - monitoring of development cost (3 years) 2) (a) Summers - Do not like DCA Plan. Determine which will be the smallest cost to taxpayers. (b) J. W. Jones - letter stating ideas The Chairman directed the County Administrator to meet with staff and come up with recommendations for future cost for the implementation of the Comp Plan, and place back on the agenda. The meeting adjourned at 12:00 P. M. ______________________________ Chairman Attest: ________________________ Clerk ***************************************************************** PUBLIC HEARING OF THE BOARD, AUGUST 11, 1993 The meeting was called to order at 5:30 P.M. with the following members present: James L. Gose Carl Cool Audrey Vickers J. Ross Macbeth Archie Summers Louise Graham C. Guy Maxcy Doris Gentry The Chairman advised that this hearing was being held to consider an Ordinance providing for changes to Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances, pertaining to zoning. Proof of Publication was entered into the record, and made a part of the permanent record of the Clerks office. See SMB 19 Page 11. The Board Attorney advised that the only change in the draft that was given to the Board for review was an addition of a new section number 38. The other sections were renumbered after that section. The proposed changes is a clean-up and to readjust some changes that were made in 1989 with B-1, B-2 and B-3. These changes are a compilation of things that has occurred over the past decade. CHANGES REVIEWED BY THE BOARD ATTORNEY - SECTION 1 - 2 - 3. PRESTON COLBY - QUESTIONS The Chairman requested that changes regarding Junk Yards should be moved up as the public was interested in that section. CHANGES REVIEWED BY THE BOARD ATTORNEY - SECTION 12-302 JUNK YARDS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: GENE WHITAKER BUTCH THOMPSON OF OLD SOUTH JUNK YARD The consensus of the Board was to leave the change as an option and not to enforce as a requirement. RECESS - 8:05 P. M. - 8:30 P. M. REVIEW OF CHANGES CONTINUED THROUGH SECTION 71. See Ordinance File for copy of changes BOARD ATTORNEY - CAPTIONS OF THE ORDINANCE READ INTO THE RECORD. The County Administrator reported that the next Hearing will be held in the Board of County Commissioners Building on 8/25/93 at 5:30 P. M. for the final adoption. The meeting adjourned at 9:45 P. M. ______________________________ Chairman Attest: ________________________ Clerk ***************************************************************** BOOK 15 PAGE 388 PUBLIC HEARING OF THE BOARD, AUGUST 19, 1993 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The meeting was called to order at 5:30 P.M. with the following members present: James L. Gose L. E. "Luke" Brooker Audrey Vickers Carl Cool Archie Summers J. Ross Macbeth C. Guy Maxcy Louise Graham Doris Gentry I. Chairman Gose convenes the Public Hearing. 2. County Planner entered proof of publication into the record. See SMB 19 Page 19. 3. Roll call to establish quorum for the record 4. Larry Ford, Legal Assistant - for Senator Dantzler Mary Ann Goza, Legal Assistant - for Representative Harris 5. Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations - Macbeth 6. D.C.A. Comments - Maria Abadall, Tony Arrant 7. Jimmy Livingston - representing Commander Lombar & Grace Twitty Bryant - UGA should be all the way to US 98. Add 3 - 1/4 sections: SW 1/4, Section 15 - 35 - 29 NE 1/4, Section 15 - 35 - 29 SE 1/4, Section 16 - 35 - 29 8. Gary Gossett - representing Dean Smith - have I-2 zoning now; request to not change to Urban Agriculture, leave as is with I-2 zoning. 9. Joe Clark - NRE Policy 11.7 a) How do you flood proof a home? b) Did we consider N.F.C? c) How are we going to get the septic tank in? d) What are we going to do about the animals in the weeds? e) Define Surface Water Body f) UGA vs Concurrency Management Plan 10. Jeff Futch - opposes changes 11. Pete McDevitt - take UGA out of Plan a) favors Concurrency Management Plan b) Notice to each land owner c) opposes Wellhead Protection Ordinance 12. Jackie Fauls - Citrus Growers Association a) Costs - compare Future vs. Past costs to develop b) Duplicate Regulations c) Opposes UGA concept; favors Concurrency Management Plan d) Notify all land owners e) Delete words "whenever possible" in Wellhead Policy BOOK 15 PAGE 389 f) Delete paragraph D2, Page INF-12 g) Do not duplicate regulations - NRE h) No "County Land Clearing Permit" needed. Use other agencies. i) Species of Special Concern should not be in Plan J) Supports using soil survey for the Conservation Overlay Map Recess 7:10 P. M. - 7:30 P. M. 13. John Payne - Cattlemen's Association - objects to Plan Amendment as: a) Not beneficial to County b) Unsupported by residents c) Being the dictate of the State d) More regulations means less freedom to determine own destiny e) Negatively impacts County economy f) Creating unwanted bureaucracy 14. Kris Delaney - H.E.C. a) Data and analysis has not been updated, and do not back up the Plan amendment. b) Plan must be based upon documents c) Where can support documents be inspected? d) Request support documents be adopted as part of the Plan. e) Other agencies have not protected natural resources. f) Well setback - 1,000 feet is justified - should not be changed. g) Land use should be regulated by Local Government h) Species of Special Concern- Protected by Rule 9-J5 i) Supports Lew Carter's suggestion to use soils map for Conservation Overlay. j) Water Body - definition available k) Land Use Maps - not supported by data and analysis l) Supports adoption of Plan amendment 15. John Tallent - Lykes Bros a) Against duplication of regulations b) Plan is not supported by data and analysis c) Future Land Use Element - Change to Concurrency Manag ement Plan d) FLU Policy 1.4 Consistency Rezones - notify everyone e) Species of Special Concern - not in statutes, but in 9-J5 f) NRE 3.1 Threatened and Endangered Species - should not be in Plan g) NRE 3.1 (b) - opposed to list of publications h) NRE 3.2 - Opposed to current "Conservation Overlay Map" being inadequate to do the job i) NRE 3.7 - Conservation Trust Fund, How much money in Fund? j) Land Clearing Permit - Opposed i) INF 6.4 - Wellhead Protection - No data and analysis to support j) Plan threatens land owners' rights 16. Marvin Kahn - Citrus Grower BOOK 15 PAGE 390 a) Agrees with Jackie Fauls' comments b) Plan creates a system that only the wealthy will be able to afford to work under c) Will offer support if amendment is not passed 17. Hank Kowalski a) Agree with Kris Delaney b) NRE 3.4 change work "may" to "shall" c) Definition of Wetlands d) Question of Future Land Element 18. Greg Harris a) Objects to UGA Planning Approach b) Plan will discourage development c) Opposed to duplicate Regulation 19. Marty McKenna a) Objects to land clearing policy as duplicating regs in place b) Costs for local permits c) Supports Jackie Fauls' comments 20. Jimmy Wohl a) Opposed to central government controlling the people b) Opposes the entire concept of Planning law and supports joining Santa Rosa County c) Oppose the amendments to Plan 21. Rep. Rick Minton a) St. Lucie County Plan experience b) Advised the Board to adopt a Plan it can live with c) amendments are lengthy or not cost-effective for very small developments.