Physical Assessment of Mahoning Creek Watershed Jennifer Clark, Will Tumbusch, Dr. Mel Zimmerman Lycoming College Clean Water Institute Mahoning Creek Mauses Creek Deposition Bars Ford 0.60% 1% Pipes 22.40% 30.95% Deposition Bars Rip Rap 37.50% 43.83% Pipes Tributaries Rip Rap Sediment Pollution 12.34% Sechler Run 8.33% Tributaries Total Erosion Sites 7.74% 9.50% 5.52%1% 6.82% Dam Total Erosion Sites Deposition Bars Summary of Disturbances Along Mauses Creek Summary of Disturbances Along Mahoning Creek 25.78% Pipes 34.22% Rip Rap Tributaries Concrete Wall 1% 13.72% Site 48, Mauses Creek Site 132, Mahoning Creek 9.78% Total Erosion Sites 7.11% High erosion potential for High erosion potential for bank bank angle, bank height, height and bank angle, and Summary of Disturbances Along Sechler Run root density, and particle moderate erosion potential for size particle size and root density Kase Run Indian Run Site 53, Kase Run Low erosion potential Site 19, Indian Run for bank height, and high Moderate erosion potential erosion potential for bank for bank height and bank angle, angle, particle size, and And high erosion potential for Site 131, Sechler Run root density particle size and root density High erosion potential for bank angle, and moderate erosion potential for bank height, particle size, and Ford Horse Crossing root density 1.28% 1.28% 10.34% 1.72% 17.24% Deposition Bars 30.77% Deposition Bars Pipes 43.59% Pipes Tributaries Tributaries 10.34% Concrete Wall 3.85% Rip Rap 41.38% Total Erosion Site 2.56% 3.45% 10.26% Total Erosion Sites Rip Rap 1.72% Dam Summary of Disturbances Along Indian Run Summary of Disturbances Along Kase Run.