STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA J. D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION OH 715/2 Full transcript of an interview with CLYDE CAMERON on 24 November 2005 By Peter Donovan Recording available on CD Access for research: Unrestricted Right to photocopy: Copies may be made for research and study Right to quote or publish: Publication only with written permission from the State Library OH 715/2 CLYDE CAMERON NOTES TO THE TRANSCRIPT This transcript was created by the J. D. Somerville Oral History Collection of the State Library. It conforms to the Somerville Collection's policies for transcription which are explained below. Readers of this oral history transcript should bear in mind that it is a record of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The State Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the interview, nor for the views expressed therein. As with any historical source, these are for the reader to judge. It is the Somerville Collection's policy to produce a transcript that is, so far as possible, a verbatim transcript that preserves the interviewee's manner of speaking and the conversational style of the interview. Certain conventions of transcription have been applied (ie. the omission of meaningless noises, false starts and a percentage of the interviewee's crutch words). Where the interviewee has had the opportunity to read the transcript, their suggested alterations have been incorporated in the text (see below). On the whole, the document can be regarded as a raw transcript. Abbreviations: The interviewee’s alterations may be identified by their initials in insertions in the transcript. Punctuation: Square bracket [ ] indicate material in the transcript that does not occur on the original tape recording. This is usually words, phrases or sentences which the interviewee has inserted to clarify or correct meaning. These are not necessarily differentiated from insertions the interviewer or by Somerville Collection staff which are either minor (a linking word for clarification) or clearly editorial. Relatively insignificant word substitutions or additions by the interviewee as well as minor deletions of words or phrases are often not indicated in the interest of readability. Extensive additional material supplied by the interviewee is usually placed in footnotes at the bottom of the relevant page rather than in square brackets within the text. A series of dots, .... .... .... .... indicates an untranscribable word or phrase. Sentences that were left unfinished in the normal manner of conversation are shown ending in three dashes, - - -. Spelling: Wherever possible the spelling of proper names and unusual terms has been verified. A parenthesised question mark (?) indicates a word that it has not been possible to verify to date. Typeface: The interviewer's questions are shown in bold print. Discrepancies between transcript and tape: This proofread transcript represents the authoritative version of this oral history interview. Researchers using the original tape recording of this interview are cautioned to check this transcript for corrections, additions or deletions which have been made by the interviewer or the interviewee but which will not occur on the tape. See the Punctuation section above.) Minor discrepancies of grammar and sentence structure made in the interest of readability can be ignored but significant changes such as deletion of information or correction of fact should be, respectively, duplicated or acknowledged when the tape recorded version of this interview is used for broadcast or any other form of audio publication. 2 J.D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION, STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA: INTERVIEW NO. OH 715/2 Interview with Clyde Cameron recorded by Peter Donovan on the 24th November 2004 at West Lakes for the Don Dunstan Foundation. (Throughout the interview it is apparent that the interviewee frequently refers to, and reads from, written materials.) TAPE 1 SIDE A This is Peter Donovan speaking with Mr Clyde Cameron for the Dunstan Foundation, I’m speaking with Clyde at his home at West Lakes on 24th November 2004. Now, Clyde, you’ve written an autobiography, so if people who want to listen to this tape want to find out about you they can go to that, so we’re primarily interested in Don Dunstan and his public life. But you were very important in that, particularly in the early days where you were directly involved with him, and certainly later you had perspectives on the rest of his career. Where were you in about 1950, and what was the perspective that you brought to the Don Dunstan period? I think the perspective I would have brought to Don would have been before 1950. I became the State Secretary of the Australian Workers’ Union in 1941. I very quickly became a prominent figure in the Australian Labor Party to the point where I was elected to the Executive of the Party and remained on it for something like thirty years or more. I became President of the Party in South Australia in 1946, I remained as President for two years altogether, and no other person served for more than two years straight. I served as a State President for a year in 1953 and for another year later on, so altogether it was four years. In 1946 I introduced – reintroduced, I should say – the card system of voting at Conferences. That meant that, instead of a large union having to send sixteen or eighteen delegates to represent them under the rules that dealt with the representation at that time, I introduced the card system limiting the maximum that a union could send to the Conference to six! But, if a card vote was called on a matter, the six votes – instead of just having six votes towards the determination of the result, each of the six would have one-sixth of the number of membership affiliates that belonged to the Party, that were financed by the union. The union – when I say ‘financed by the union’, the union was required to pay to the Party the same membership fee they would have to pay if they joined as individuals if they 3 weren’t a member of a union and joined a sub-branch. So, it meant that that gave to the Trade Union Movement a far greater say than they’d had with the number of extra delegates. It still wouldn’t be equal to the extra importance that the unions would be able to demand under the card vote. We wouldn’t allow the card vote to be used at the monthly Council meetings of the Party; it could only be used at the Conference and it could only be used if it was asked for by more than one affiliate. That played a very important part in Don Dunstan becoming a Member through being endorsed as a Labor candidate for Norwood; and that was only because I did not carry out the decision of the AWU Caucus in deciding they would support the Secretary of the Gas Workers’ Union for the endorsement. I stayed away from that Caucus meeting because then I could argue that I didn’t know what they did there, but I did know. And so, when I was given the six books of voting coupons to take to the AWU office, I said to the ALP1 Secretary: ‘Well, before you do that I want to restaple two of them, I want to take the voting slip that gives me one more vote than the other five, and put that into one of the other five; and I’m going to take for my entitlement one of the five that are exactly the same as each other, so that their scrutineers will not be able to say how I voted and somebody else will get blamed for what I was supposed to have done.’ So, when the vote on the selection of the candidate for Norwood came up, I had 2204 and one of the other six delegates had 2205 votes. So when the votes were being counted, the scrutineer for Eric O’Connor, the Secretary of the AWU, was able to report that a delegate had used Cameron’s ballot paper and had voted for Dunstan; which meant that one of the other five delegates had ratted2. Dunstan won by 500-odd votes; but without the benefit of my 2,204 votes he would have been defeated by nearly 1,000 votes. I knew Dunstan well enough to know that he was so much better than the Secretary of the Gas Workers’ Union that I would not have been true to the Labor Party if I didn’t do something to prevent that from happening. 1 ALP – Australian Labor Party. 2 O'Connor's scrutineer told him, ‘Clyde voted for our man but one of our mob voted for bloody Dunstan’ – CC. 4 When did you first meet Don Dunstan, and why did he impress you so much? Because he’s effectively a man from the other side of the tracks. I first met Don while he was still at St Peter’s College, and when he went to the University I saw him more often. And he confessed to me that he had been a member of the Communist Party for only a few weeks and that he had then joined the Liberal Party and had impressed the Liberals to such an extent that they asked him to do the radio scatters during the election and paid him £70 for it. He told the Executive, ‘I’m telling you all this, because eventually the Liberals will reveal it and perhaps the Communists will also throw their story into the ring as well, and that will then have to be determined by the Executive of the Party.