Notes on Operator Algebras

Notes on Operator Algebras

Notes on operator algebras Jesse Peterson March 17, 2014 2 Chapter 1 Spectral theory If A is a complex unital algebra then we denote by G(A) the set of elements which have a two sided inverse. If x 2 A, the spectrum of x is σA(x) = fλ 2 C j x − λ 62 G(A)g: The complement of the spectrum is called the resolvent and denoted ρA(x). Proposition 1.0.1. Let A be a unital algebra over C, and consider x; y 2 A. Then σA(xy) [ f0g = σA(yx) [ f0g. Proof. If 1 − xy 2 G(A) then we have (1 − yx)(1 + y(1 − xy)−1x) = 1 − yx + y(1 − xy)−1x − yxy(1 − xy)−1x = 1 − yx + y(1 − xy)(1 − xy)−1x = 1: Similarly, we have (1 + y(1 − xy)−1x)(1 − yx) = 1; and hence 1 − yx 2 G(A). Knowing the formula for the inverse beforehand of course made the proof of the previous proposition quite a bit easier. But this formula is quite natural to consider. Indeed, if we just consider formal power series then we have 1 1 X X (1 − yx)−1 = (yx)k = 1 + y( (xy)k)x = 1 + y(1 − xy)−1x: k=0 k=0 1.1 Banach and C∗-algebras A Banach algebra is a Banach space A, which is also an algebra such that kxyk ≤ kxkkyk: 3 4 CHAPTER 1. SPECTRAL THEORY A Banach algebra A is involutive if it possesses an anti-linear involution ∗, such that kx∗k = kxk, for all x 2 A. If an involutive Banach algebra A additionally satisfies kx∗xk = kxk2; for all x 2 A, then we say that A is a C∗-algebra. If a Banach or C∗-algebra is unital, then we further require k1k = 1. Note that if A is a unital involutive Banach algebra, and x 2 G(A) then −1 ∗ ∗ −1 ∗ (x ) = (x ) , and hence σA(x ) = σA(x). Example 1.1.1. Let K be a locally compact Hausdorff space. Then the space ∗ C0(K) of complex valued continuous functions which vanish at infinity is a C - algebra when given the supremum norm kfk1 = supx2K jf(x)j. This is unital if and only if K is compact. Example 1.1.2. Let H be a complex Hilbert space. Then the space of all bounded operators B(H) is a C∗-algebra when endowed with the operator norm kxk = supξ2H;kξk≤1 kxξk. Lemma 1.1.3. Let A be a unital Banach algebra and suppose x 2 A such that k1 − xk < 1, then x 2 G(A). P1 k Proof. Since k1 − xk < 1, the element y = k=0(1 − x) is well defined, and it is easy to see that xy = yx = 1. Proposition 1.1.4. Let A be a unital Banach algebra, then G(A) is open, and the map x 7! x−1 is a continuous map on G(A). Proof. If y 2 G(A) and kx − yk < ky−1k then k1 − xy−1k < 1 and hence by the previous lemma xy−1 2 G(A) (hence also x = xy−1y 2 G(A)) and 1 X kxy−1k ≤ k(1 − xy−1)kn n=0 1 X 1 ≤ ky−1knky − xkn = : 1 − kyk−1ky − xk n=0 Hence, kx−1 − y−1k = kx−1(y − x)y−1k ky−1k2 ≤ ky−1(xy−1)−1kky−1kky − xk ≤ ky − xk: 1 − ky−1kky − xk ky−1k2 Thus continuity follows from continuity of the map t 7! 1−ky−1kt t, at t = 0. Proposition 1.1.5. Let A be a unital Banach algebra, and suppose x 2 A, then σA(x) is a non-empty compact set. 1.1. BANACH AND C∗-ALGEBRAS 5 x Proof. If kxk < jλj then λ − 1 2 G(A) by Lemma 1.1.3, also σA(x) is closed by Proposition 1.1.4, thus σA(x) is compact. ∗ To see that σA(x) is non-empty note that for any linear functional ' 2 A , −1 we have that f(z) = '((x − z) ) is analytic on ρA(x). Indeed, if z; z0 2 ρA(x) then we have −1 −1 −1 −1 (x − z) − (x − z0) = (x − z) (z − z0)(x − z0) : Since inversion is continuous it then follows that f(z) − f(z0) −2 lim = '((x − z0) ): z!z0 z − z0 We also have limz!1 f(z) = 0, and hence if σA(x) were empty then f would be a bounded entire function and we would then have f = 0. Since ' 2 A∗ were arbitrary this would then contradict the Hahn-Banach theorem. Theorem 1.1.6 (Gelfand-Mazur). Suppose A is a unital Banach algebra such that every non-zero element is invertible, then A =∼ C. Proof. Fix x 2 A, and take λ 2 σ(x). Since x − λ is not invertible we have that x − λ = 0, and the result then follows. Pn k If f(z) = k=0 akz is a polynomial, and x 2 A, a unital Banach algebra, Pn k then we define f(x) = k=0 akx 2 A. Proposition 1.1.7. Let A be a unital Banach algebra, x 2 A and f a polyno- mial. then σA(f(x)) = f(σA(x)). Pn k Proof. If λ 2 σA(x), and f(z) = k=0 akz then n X k k f(x) − f(λ) = ak(x − λ ) k=1 k−1 X X j k−j−1 = (x − λ) ak x λ ; k=1 j=0 hence f(λ) 2 σA(x). conversely if µ 62 f(σA(x)) and we factor f − µ as f − µ = αn(x − λ1) ··· (x − λn); then since f(λ) − µ 6= 0, for all λ 2 σA(x) it follows that λi 62 σA(x), for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, hence f(x) − µ 2 G(A). If A is a unital Banach algebra and x 2 A, the spectral radius of x is r(x) = sup jλj: λ2σA(x) Note that by Proposition 1.1.5 the spectral radius is finite, and the supremum is attained. Also note that by Proposition 1.0.1 we have the very useful equality r(xy) = r(yx) for all x and y in a unital Banach algebra A. A priori the spectral radius depends on the Banach algebra in which x lives, but we will show now that this is not the case. 6 CHAPTER 1. SPECTRAL THEORY Proposition 1.1.8. Let A be a unital Banach algebra, and suppose x 2 A. n 1=n Then limn!1 kx k exists and we have r(x) = lim kxnk1=n: n!1 Proof. By Proposition 1.1.7 we have r(xn) = r(x)n, and hence r(x)n ≤ kxnk; n 1=n showing that r(x) ≤ lim infn!1 kx k . n 1=n To show that r(x) ≥ lim supn!1 kx k , consider the domain Ω = fz 2 C j jzj > r(x)g, and fix a linear functional ' 2 A∗. We showed in Proposition 1.1.5 that z 7! '((x−z)−1) is analytic in Ω and as such we have a Laurent expansion 1 X an '((z − x)−1) = ; zn n=0 for jzj > r(x). However, we also know that for jzj > kxk we have 1 X '(xn−1) '((z − x)−1) = : zn n=1 By uniqueness of the Laurent expansion we then have that 1 X '(xn−1) '((z − x)−1) = ; zn n=1 for jzj > r(x). '(xn−1) Hence for jzj > r(x) we have that limn!1 jzjn = 0, for all linear functionals ' 2 A∗. By the uniform boundedness principle we then have n−1 kx k n 1=n limn!1 jzjn = 0, hence jzj > lim supn!1 kx k , and thus n 1=n r(x) ≥ lim sup kx k : n!1 Exercise 1.1.9. Suppose A is a unital Banach algebra, and I ⊂ A is a closed two sided ideal, then A=I is again a unital Banach algebra, when given the norm ka + Ik = infy2I ka + yk, and (a + I)(b + I) = (ab + I). Exercise 1.1.10. Let A be a unital Banach algebra and suppose x; y 2 A such that xy = yx. Show that r(xy) ≤ r(x)r(y). 1.2 The Gelfand transform Let A be a abelian Banach algebra, the spectrum of A, denoted by σ(A), is the set of continuous ∗-homomorphsims ' : A ! C such that k'k = 1, which we endow with the weak*-topology as a subset of A∗. 1.3. CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONAL CALCULUS 7 Note that if A is unital, and ' : A ! C is a ∗-homomorphism, then it follows easily that ker(') \ G(A) = ;. In particular, this shows that '(x) 2 σ(x), since x − '(x) 2 ker('). Hence, for all x 2 A we have j'(x)j ≤ r(x) ≤ kxk. Since, '(1) = 1 this shows that the condition k'k = 1 is automatic in the unital case. It is also easy to see that when A is unital σ(A) is closed and bounded, by the Banach-Alaoglu theorem it is then a compact Hausdorff space. Proposition 1.2.1. Let A be a unital Banach algebra. Then the association ' 7! ker(') gives a bijection between the spectrum of A and the space of maximal ideals. Proof. If ' 2 σ(A) then ker(') is clearly an ideal, and if we have a larger ideal I, then there exists x 2 I such that '(x) 6= 0, hence 1 − x='(x) 2 ker(') ⊂ I and so 1 = (1 − x='(x)) + x='(x) 2 I which implies I = A.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    54 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us