NEC FUTURE a Rail Investment Plan for the Northeast Corridor Washington, D.C., to Boston, Massachusetts July 2017

NEC FUTURE a Rail Investment Plan for the Northeast Corridor Washington, D.C., to Boston, Massachusetts July 2017

Record of Decision: NEC FUTURE A Rail Investment Plan for the Northeast Corridor Washington, D.C., to Boston, Massachusetts July 2017 Prepared by: For more information contact: Rebecca Reyes-Alicea, Northeast Corridor Joint Program Advisor Office of Railroad Policy and Development One Bowling Green, Suite 429 New York, NY 10004 FRA Record of Decision: NEC FUTURE Contents SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................................. I 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE PROGRAM ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1.1 Purpose Statement ................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1.2 Need Statement ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Alternatives Considered ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1 No Action Alternative ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 Action Alternatives ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2.3 Preferred Alternative.............................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Alternatives Evaluation ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.4 Summary of Public Feedback from Tier 1 Final EIS.............................................................................. 10 2.5 Identification of the Selected Alternative ........................................................................................... 12 3. NEC FUTURE DECISION ................................................................................................................................ 14 3.1 Overview of Selected Alternative ....................................................................................................... 14 3.2 IMPROVE RAIL SERVICE: Corridor-Wide Objectives ............................................................................ 17 3.2.1 Service and Performance ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Integrated Operations .......................................................................................................................... 19 3.3 MODERNIZE NEC INFRASTRUCTURE: Achieve a Reliable NEC ............................................................. 21 3.3.1 No Action Alternative and Related Projects ......................................................................................... 22 3.4 EXPAND RAIL CAPACITY: Add New Infrastructure Elements ............................................................... 22 3.5 STUDY NEW HAVEN TO PROVIDENCE CAPACITY ................................................................................. 31 3.6 Other Features of the Selected Alternative ........................................................................................ 32 3.6.1 Continued Rail Planning ....................................................................................................................... 32 3.6.2 Connecting Corridors ............................................................................................................................ 33 3.6.3 Station Improvements .......................................................................................................................... 33 3.6.4 Systems and Technology ...................................................................................................................... 34 3.6.5 Rolling Stock ......................................................................................................................................... 34 3.7 Geographic Description of the Selected Alternative ........................................................................... 36 3.7.1 Washington, D.C. .................................................................................................................................. 36 3.7.2 Maryland .............................................................................................................................................. 37 3.7.3 Delaware .............................................................................................................................................. 37 3.7.4 Pennsylvania ......................................................................................................................................... 38 3.7.5 New Jersey ........................................................................................................................................... 38 3.7.6 New York .............................................................................................................................................. 39 3.7.7 Connecticut .......................................................................................................................................... 39 3.7.8 Rhode Island ......................................................................................................................................... 40 3.7.9 Massachusetts ...................................................................................................................................... 40 3.8 Cost .................................................................................................................................................... 41 3.9 Key Benefits of the Selected Alternative ............................................................................................ 42 4. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS AND MEASURES TO AVOID AND MINIMIZE HARM ........................................... 44 4.1 Tiered NEPA Process ........................................................................................................................... 44 4.2 Summary of Environmental Effects .................................................................................................... 44 4.2.1 Service-Related Effects ......................................................................................................................... 44 4.2.2 Footprint-Related Effects (Physical Effects) ......................................................................................... 45 4.2.3 Indirect and Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................................... 46 4.3 Potential Measures to Avoid and Minimize Harm .............................................................................. 46 Page | i FRA Record of Decision: NEC FUTURE 4.4 Environmentally Preferable Alternative ............................................................................................. 48 5. IMPLEMENTING THE SELECTED ALTERNATIVE ............................................................................................. 49 5.1 FRA ..................................................................................................................................................... 49 5.1.1 FRA Commitments ................................................................................................................................ 50 5.2 Agency Roles ...................................................................................................................................... 50 5.2.1 FTA ........................................................................................................................................................ 51 5.2.2 NEC Commission ................................................................................................................................... 51 5.2.3 Metropolitan Planning Organizations .................................................................................................. 51 5.2.4 Railroad Owners and Operators ........................................................................................................... 52 5.3 Service Development Plan .................................................................................................................. 52 5.4 Consistency with the Selected Alternative ......................................................................................... 52 5.4.1 Consistency Criteria .............................................................................................................................. 53 6. TIER 2 PROJECT STUDIES ............................................................................................................................. 55 6.1 Use of the Tier 1 EIS in Tier 2 Project Studies ...................................................................................... 55 6.2 Considerations for Tier 2 Project Studies ...........................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    71 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us