Dispersal in the Solitary Stegodyphus Africanus and Heterospecific Grouping with the Social Stegodyphus Dumicola (Araneae, Eresidae)

Dispersal in the Solitary Stegodyphus Africanus and Heterospecific Grouping with the Social Stegodyphus Dumicola (Araneae, Eresidae)

1998 . The Journal of Arachnology 26 :97-100 DISPERSAL IN THE SOLITARY STEGODYPHUS AFRICANUS AND HETEROSPECIFIC GROUPING WITH THE SOCIAL STEGODYPHUS DUMICOLA (ARANEAE, ERESIDAE) U. Seibt, I . Wickler and W. Wickler : Max-Planck-Institut fur Verhaltensphysiologie ; D-82319 Seewiesen, Federal Republic of Germany ABSTRACT . Mobility and dispersal of the solitary-living spider, Stegodvphus africanus Blackwall 1866, under laboratory conditions are described for the period from four months after hatching until death . Cohabitation with females of the social-living S. dumicola Pocock 1898, within the same experimental setup, reveals interspecific tolerance between both species . Special attention has recently been paid to mopane bush, containing a dead adult female the cribellate eresid spider genus Stegodyphus with 82 living spiderlings, of 3-4 mm body Simon 1892 which contains both subsocial length (= prosoma + opisthosoma, measured species with solitary adults, hereafter referred to ± 0 .1 mm with a vernier calliper) . We took to as solitary, as well as permanently social the sponge-like nest to our laboratory to ob- species . A revision of the genus by O . & M . tain data on the dispersal tendency of the Kraus (1988) suggests three monophyletic growing spiderlings . Voucher specimens have subtaxa, or species groups, each of which in- been deposited in the arachnid collection of cludes a number of solitary as well as a single the Zoological Museum, Hamburg University . social species, proposing that sociality We estimated that the S . africanus spider- evolved independently three times . In view of lings had hatched from the cocoon at the be- the socially intolerant and aggressive lifestyle ginning of January, about 30 days prior to col- of the vast majority of spiders, the perma- lection . Four months after hatching, we placed nently and cooperatively social (Wickler & the original nest with 54 surviving spiderlings Seibt 1993) species form noteworthy excep- into a 12-sided acrylic plastic (Plexiglas ®) tions . Unfortunately, up to now the biology of container (Fig . 1) with a removable wire the social species' solitary sister species is screen area in the floor for aeration, feeding practically unknown . On S. africanus in par- and cleaning . Along the outer rim of the con- ticular, nothing had been published except for tainer's flat ceiling, 12 evenly spaced "hous- the original description in 1866 . es" served as housing for emigrants ; they In Kruger Park, South Africa and in Swa- consisted of a vertical Plexiglas "pipe" (C) ziland we repeatedly found a fully-grown S . which opened into a larger compartment, a africanus female living parasitically in a col- Plexiglas cylinder (D) with a removable wire ony of the social S. dumicola and even con- screen lid . The spiders were fed mostly flies, according to their sizes ; and food was simul- suming individuals of the host species (Wick- taneously supplied to all of them at their re- ler & Seibt 1988) . Therefore, we also wanted spective sites in order not to enforce feeding to confront the under controlled S. africanus migrations and accumulations . laboratory conditions with S. hop- dumicola, Within the Plexiglas container we identified ing for more data on interspecific behavior. 49 sites (see Fig . l ): Twelve A, B, C, D loca- METHODS tions, plus the central ground area where the original nest had been placed . At variable in- In February 1992, near Nshawu-Dam in the tervals (one day or more) we recorded the Kruger Park (South Africa, Transvaal ; numbers of spider sightings at those sites (i .e ., 23°29'S, 31°29'E) in dry, fairly flat grassland outside the original nest) starting on 29 April with squat Colophospermum mopane trees, 1992 . The observed number of animals varied we collected a S. africanus silk nest, 8 cm in because some returned to their non-transpar- diameter, situated about two meters high in a ent home nest or died . 97 98 THE JOURNAL OF ARACHNOLOGY Table I .--Observation periods and Stegodyphus spiders observed. Proto- Days cols Spi- Sight- per per ders ings Species Period period period (n) (n) S. africanus 1 59 28 36 851 S. africanus IIa 113 23 32 430 S. africanus IIb 82 10 8 79 S. africanus III 207 68 8 244 S. dumicola 21 406 moved. In our system, these spiders turned up elsewhere ; an increase of spider number at a given site from first to second record was therefore ignored . The total observation time (461 days) was formally subdivided into three periods (Table 1): Period IIa began when the first adult S . africanus males appeared, and it ended when the last S. africanus male had died and only female S. africanus were left (Period IIb) . Pe- riod III began when we added S. dumicola individuals from a colony that we had col- lected in December 1992 near the S. africanus locality . Thus, periods I and II deal with S. africanus only, while during period III the two species are mixed . Young Stegodyphus tend to stay in the ma- ternal web structure until a certain age, at which they begin to disperse . In our experi- mental setup spiders had the option to dis- perse, and to form groups or isolate them- selves; we always found some (though different) "houses" empty (from 1-3 in pe- riod IIa to 2-7 in period III, with always 13- Figure 1 .-Diagram of the acrylic plastic (Plexi- 30 spiders present) . glas) apparatus (diameter = 19 cm) : Face of one side with two of the twelve "houses" : A, B, C, D, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION observation sites; numbers, lengths in cm . Below: Cross-section at level C. On 28 April 1992 the S. africanus spider- lings had grown to a body length between 4.0-7 .5 mm (mean X = 5 .4, SD = {- 0.8 mm; As numbers of spiders per site varied be- n = 54) ; their weight ranged from 7-49 mg. tween records, pairs of records 24 h apart About four months later, adult males mea- were chosen to estimate spider mobility . Due sured from 4-12 mm (8 .3 ± 1 .6 mm; n = 20) to ongoing asynchronous moltings, the indi- and weighed from 48-170 mg (73.8 ± 41 mg; viduals could not be marked without destruc- n = 18) . At the same time females measured tive interference. Therefore, we assumed no from 8.4-16.0 mm (12.2 ± 2.5 mm; n = 17) mobility if the number of spiders at a given and weighed from 79-545 mg (370 ± 210 site had not changed between successive rec- mg; n = 24) . As indicated by field data (Seibt ords. A lower count in a second record gave & Wickler 1988), fully grown social S. dum- the minimum number of spiders that had icola females are much smaller (7.5 ± 1 .2 SEIBT ET AL .-DISPERSAL AND GROUPING IN STEGODYPHUS SPIDERS 99 50 - females were seen pairwise in 10% of all sightings (n = 79), in 90% singly . The differ- 40 - ence between periods IIa and IIb is significant (P < 0 .001, = 27, df = 1). This decreasing 30 - X2 number of grouped animals over time could 20 - be due to an effect of male presence, of de- creasing numbers, or of increasing age . As 10- 58% of a total of 129 male sightings showed them without females, males do not seem to 0 attract females or induce female groupings . To 0 50 100 150 200 account for the decrease in number of animals days and increasing age over time, a partial corre- Figure 2 .-Percent of recorded spiders in the lation was used : a series of 61 protocols over ground region in 38 (independent) protocols over the successive periods I, IIa and IIb showed a 173 days . The vertical line separates periods I and significant (P < 0 .05 ; two-tailed, partial cor- IIa. relation coefficient = 0.31) age dependent in- crease in percent of animals seen isolated vs . grouped, proving an increase in isolation ten- mm, n = 877 ; 49.1 ± 2 .5 mg, n = 848) than dency with age . S. dumicola females formed S. africanus . close contact groups with up to 13 conspecif- In our apparatus, we found 24 young out- ics in 77% of all 406 sightings (Table 1, pe- side the maternal nest on the first observation riod III) . The grouping tendency was therefore day, 28 on the 8th, 36 on the 27th day. Many most like that of S. africanus spiderlings . of them tended to stay within the ground re- In 49% of all protocols for periods II and gion, i.e ., next to the maternal nest . In order III we found a single S. africanus in a previ- to test for independent data, an autocorrelation ously unoccupied "house", proving that spi- was run between successive protocols . We ders did not just move between groups . In 21 pooled all sites A and the central ground area of 24 cases where between two successive into "ground region", and 12 times sites B, records only one spider had moved from one C, D into 12 house-regions . Autocorrelation site to another it had covered the distances analysis then left us with independent data between 2, 3 or 4 "houses" . We found no from 20 protocols in Period I and 18 in Period difference in the total rate of site-changes IIa . No individual was found in the ground within 24 hours between S. africanus spider- region in just one protocol in period I, but in lings (105 changes in 286 sightings in Period period IIa, they were there in 15 protocols . I) and females (24 changes in 65 sightings in The difference is significant (P < 0 .001, X2 = Period IIa) (R*C test, P = 0 .91, X2 = 0.012, 20.7, df = 1). This change in preference for df = 1) .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us