Protecting the Environment

Protecting the Environment

Protecting the Environment The federal government owns 30 percent of the land in the ◆ Prohibit funds to be used for the 22 Landscape Conserva- United States. It wants to regulate all the rest, primarily tion Cooperatives and eight Climate Science Centers estab- through the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Clean lished by order of the Secretary of the Interior in 2009. Water Act’s Section 404 wetlands regulations. The Endan- ◆ Prohibit funds to be used to finalize and implement the gered Species Act has proven bad for wildlife because it is bad proposed Waters of the United States rule. Congress should for people. The ESA has largely failed to protect endangered tighten the statutory definition of wetlands so that it is plants and animals because the threat of regulatory takings within the limits of its constitutional authority. creates perverse incentives for landowners to manage their ◆ Enact takings compensation legislation to compensate land so that it does not provide habitat for listed species. Reg- property owners for regulatory takings under the ESA or the ulation of wetlands under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Clean Water Act’s Section 404 wetlands regulations. has gone far beyond what Congress intended when it wrote the law. Congress should rein in the Obama administration’s The Obama administration is in the process of finalizing a rule worst regulatory excesses involving the ESA and wetlands, that would make major changes in the criteria for defining crit- while pursuing enactment of regulatory takings compensation ical habitat for endangered species. Although the U.S. Fish and legislation. Wildlife Service (FWS) has described those changes as minor, they will in fact make it much easier for the FWS to designate Congress should: much larger areas as critical habitat than under current regula- tions. Congress should prohibit that rule from going into effect ◆ Prohibit funds to be used to finalize and implement the through an appropriations rider. proposed rule (79 Federal Register 27066) changing the criteria for defining critical habitat for species listed under In 2009, then-Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar created by sec- the Endangered Species Act. retarial order 22 Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCCs) 34 62358.1_CEI_Agenda_r1.indd 34 1/23/15 2:38 PM Protecting the Environment 35 and eight Climate Science Centers. The Climate Science Centers tives easily passed legislation to allow landowners who have lost are meant to advise the LCCs on managing all land—private and more than half the value of their property because of ESA, wet- government owned—for climate change using the Endangered lands, and other land-use regulations to claim compensation. Species Act. Since changes in the climate could cause habitats to In 2004 and again in 2005, Oregon voters passed referendums change, species may have to migrate to survive. Planning for those by wide margins to provide compensation for property owners projected changes could require a huge expansion in critical hab- who have lost value in their property because of state land-use itat designations under the ESA. Those two programs have never regulations. been authorized by Congress. Congress should eliminate funding for both the LCCs and the Climate Science Centers. It is critical for Congress to address takings compensation, as the Obama administration is preparing a new endangered The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing species power grab over large parts of the country, as well as a Clean Water Act rule that redefines the Waters of the United attempting to vastly expand wetlands jurisdiction. Currently, States. The proposed redefinition of jurisdiction to regulate 1,563 animal and plant species are listed as endangered or wetlands constitutes a huge expansion of the EPA’s authority threatened. In 2011, the Department of the Interior settled a that directly contradicts limits set on federal jurisdiction by two lawsuit brought by two radical environmental pressure groups Supreme Court decisions: SWANCC v. Army Corps of Engineers by agreeing to review 757 species for listing according to a work and Rapanos v. United States. In those cases, the Court ruled plan that would be completed within six years. The species that the term “waters of the United States” does not include under consideration for listing include 403 species of freshwater “isolated waters” such as isolated wetlands but rather “includes mollusks in the rivers of the southeastern United States. The only those relatively permanent, standing or continuously economic damage that could be caused by those mass listings is flowing bodies of water ‘forming geographic features’ that are frightening. The way to restrain the regulators is to require the described in ordinary parlance as ‘streams[,] . oceans, rivers, federal government, not landowners, to bear the costs of their [and] lakes.’” regulations. Congress should prohibit finalization and implementation of Experts: Myron Ebell, Marlo Lewis, Robert J. Smith that rule through an appropriations rider. For Further Reading The underlying problem with both the ESA and Section 404 Bonner Cohen, “The Endangered Species Act: Bad for People, wetlands regulations is that regulators have no incentive to Bad for Wildlife,” National Policy Analysis, No. 511, May contain costs because the costs are borne by landowners. The 2004, http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA511.html. solution is to enact regulatory takings compensation. Supreme Myron Ebell, “An Update on Endangered Species Act Reform,” Court decisions have acknowledged that regulatory takings ALEC Issue Analysis, American Legislative Exchange can fall under the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment provision: Council, April 1995, https://cei.org/op-eds-and-articles/ “nor shall private property be taken for public use without just update-endangered-species-act-reform. compensation.” However, the Court has also made it almost Ike C. Sugg, “Reforming the Endangered Species Act: The impossible to claim compensation, unless the regulation takes Property Rights Perspective,” Testimony before the Endan- all or nearly all the value of the property. gered Species Act Task Force of the House Committee on Natural Resources, May 18, 1995, The idea that the government and not private citizens should be https://cei.org/outreach-regulatory-comments-and-testi- required to pay for public benefits enjoys widespread popular mony/reforming-endangered-species-act-property support. During the 104th Congress, the House of Representa- -rights-perspect. 62358.1_CEI_Agenda_r1.indd 35 1/23/15 2:38 PM 36 Free to Prosper: A Pro-Growth Agenda for the 114th Congress FEDERAL LANDS POLICIES The vast federal estate, comprising nearly 30 percent of the The four federal land agencies control nearly 30 percent of the land land in the United States, is far too large. Many federal lands in the United States. Ownership is concentrated in the western are in poor environmental condition. At the same time, natural states and Alaska and ranges from 28 percent in Washington to 47 resource production on multiple-use lands continues to decline. percent in California to 81 percent in Nevada. Federal stewardship The 114th Congress can take significant steps to improve of those lands varies widely, but on average the environmental con- federal land management, even in the face of opposition by the dition of federal lands is poorer than that of similar private lands. Obama administration. The reason is not because there is too much natural resource Congress should: production on federal lands. Production has declined at the same time environmental conditions have declined. For example, ◆ Stop buying more private land to turn into federal land. Do timber production in the National Forests has been reduced by not reauthorize the Land and Water Conservation Fund over 80 percent since 1990, but the condition of the forests has (LWCF), which expires on September 30, 2015. If reau- declined dramatically over the same period. Federal land manag- thorized, require major reforms to the LWCF’s federal land ers do not own the land they are managing and therefore do not acquisition component. have the same incentives as private landowners to take care of it. ◆ Place a moratorium on further designations of fed- eral lands as Wilderness Areas and other preservation In much of the rural West and Alaska, massive federal landown- classifications. ership means that the federal land agencies control local econ- ◆ Reform the antiquated Antiquities Act of 1906. omies. Continuing declines in timber production, hard rock ◆ Require the U.S. Forest Service to increase timber pro- mining, oil and gas leasing, and livestock grazing resulting from duction in National Forests with mandatory targets and federal management are having devastating economic effects on timetables. many rural communities. ◆ Work to restore balance in the management of multiple-use lands to increase resource production by requiring the The federal government already owns far more land than it can take Department of the Interior to increase oil and gas leasing care of properly. To improve the environmental condition of the on federal lands and offshore areas, including in the Arc- federal estate, the first thing Congress should do is to stop acquiring tic National Wildlife Refuge, with mandatory targets and more private land. Since the Land and Water Conservation Fund timetables. was enacted in 1965, the federal government has appropriated ◆ Review and hold hearings on the extent of lands withdrawn over $15.5 billion to acquire about 5 million acres of private land, administratively from mineral production under the General according to the Congressional Research Service. Federal taxpayers Mining Act. Legislation should be drafted to reopen many must pay the annual costs for managing and protecting those lands, multiple-use areas to mineral production. which have been removed from economic production and property ◆ Conduct oversight hearings on the Bureau of Land Manage- tax rolls. The LWCF’s current 10-year authorization expires at end of ment’s and the Forest Service’s treatment of Taylor Grazing fiscal year 2015.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us