The Concealed Granite Roof South-West Cornwall

The Concealed Granite Roof South-West Cornwall

Natural Environment Research Council Institute of Geological Sciences Mineral Reconnaissance Programme Report No.1 .1 The concealed granite roof In• south-west Cornwall K. E. Beer, BSc, A. J. Burley, BSc, PhD and J. M. Tombs, BSc I I A report prepared for the Department of Industry (Reference SW 903) London: 1975 The Institute of Geological Sciences was '(ormed by the incorporation of the Geological Survey of Great Britain and the Museum of Practical Geology with Overseas Geological Surveys and is a constituent body of the Natural Environment Research Council. t NERC copyright 1975 Ie is recommended that reference· to this report be made in the following form: BEER. K. E.. BURLEY. A. J. and TOMBS. J. M. 1975. The concealed granite . roof in south-west Cornwall. Miner. Reconnaissance Programme Rep. Inst. Geol. Sci.• No.1, 16 pp [UnpubJ.] IGS 1462 25 10/75 rr:rneo in England by the Instit.ute of Geological Sciences This report relates to work carried out by the Institute of Geological 'Sciences on behalf of thE: Department of Industry. The information contained herein must not be published without reference to the Director, Institute of Geological Sciences. S. H. U. Bowie Programme Manager !nstitute of Geological Sciences 64~ 78 Gray's Inn Road London we 1x SNG CONTENTS Page BACKGROUND "I AIMS GEOPHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS 1 DRILLING 3 PRELIMINARY RESULTS 3 CONCLUSIONS 3 REFERENCES 4 APPENDIX A: GENERALISED GEOLOGICAL LOGS OF IGS BOREHOLES 5 1. Parbola Borenole 5 2. Bosworgy Borehole 13 APPENDIX B: GEOPHYSICAL BOREHOLE LOGS In pocket . 1. Par bola Borehole 2. Fraddam Borehole ACCOMPANYING MAPS: SOUTH-WEST ENGLAND, COMPLETE BOUGUER ANOMALIES In pocket 1. St Austell area: SW 9S 2. St Austell area: SW 96 3. St Austell area: SX 06 4. St Agnes area: SW 64, 74, 75 5. Hayle-Leedstown area: SW 53, 63 ILLUSTRA TION Fig. 1. Location map showing granite outcrops, SW England 2 iii Summary This report ou,lines the results of grayity sun'eys and drilling to locate cusps, possibl:-' s:"nr,lierous, in the concealed granite roof north and west of ,he C"rr:n.eneii:s granite uutcrop. The results are plotted on the two majJS of the compiece Bouguer .-\nomaly (maps -l and 5 at 1: 10 560 scale) 3ccompan:-'ing this :'e,pot't. Three oth~r maps (numbered 1 to 3) are also presen:ec ShOI\:ll::'; ,be- results of similar sun'eys in the area to the north of the St ..-\:ustell g:"Z:.nite: these are not described in this text, but a full inter­ pre:,,:ion of all of :,fie gt'avity results is in preparation. Ti,e SU1'':E:yS "rotmd the Carnrnencllis granite showed that shallower- depth prolo:1:;3tio::5 oi outcropping granites can be defined but that smaller or r:!ore (!ee;:>ly :J"..:ried rises in the roof are not eaSily recognisable. The :;'l:ol~:al.'" :~:"ps :;u;_,;est that the gt'anite roof exhibits less relief -than- expected It'OI~: other' geologicai indica"ions alld that relationships between mineralisation, pOl'pi:,':r:,' intrusion and granite eminences are considerably more complex than pos tula led ;:>reviou51y. T:Je 80s\\-Or0- jorehole penetrated granite a: 173.51 m at the intersection of :he south-I\-e::;t'sZ:.rds extension of the Carn Brea - Carn .-\rthen - Pendarves ~ra:1ite ridge lI"it!: the northern prolongation of the Tregonning - Godolf,lhin l'idge. T!ll' uppe-:,!::ost 20 11\ of granite at Bosll"orgy is greisenised with 1011"­ gradl" cassiterite, ch ... lcopyritc and pyrite disseminations. :\t Pat':)ola, dl'illing on a postulated granite cusp reached 665. 51 m without penetrating the 5teeply dipping southern flank ot' a granite ridge. C<:!.ssiterite Ira5 ,'ound in some nurro\\" quartz-c:hlorite veiJ;s, the richest carrying about 1 per cent O\"et' 0,25 m. ..\.t 379-382 rn there is a ·::omplex copper-Iead-zinc lode \':ith a thin s'2.nniferous quartz-chlorite margin, Generalised ::;eological logs of the t\\'o boreholes form :\ppendix A. Appendix H provides details of geophysical logs (G,ilmrna R2.~', Xeutron, ElectriC, Caliper, DensilY, Tempe 1'2. LUre, Diffe rential Tempera lure) measu toed by British Plaster Board Limited, iv The concealed granite roof in south-west Cornwall K. E. Beer, BSe, A. J. Burley, BSe, PhD and J. M. Tombs, BSe The following report is renroduced from AIMS t;'le Transactions of the Institute of Mining and Two economic aims were intrinsic to the i\letallurgyl by kind permission of the Editor. i~vestigation - the location of sh~,llow -depth cuspate granite bodies likely to carry stanni­ This, the second brief report upon mineral ferous vein swarms (as at Cligga, Hemerdon ami reconnaissance investigations sponsored by the St Michael's i\lount) and the'-correlation of eh'an Department of Industry (Dunham, 1973), out­ and lode frequency with concealed granite ridges. lines the results of gravity surveys and drilling Selection of the survey 'area was dictated by four instigated to locate and examine cuspate eleva­ major factors: (1) irregularity of roof surface, tions in the concealed granite roof to the north indicated by cusps and ridges cropping out at and west of the Carnmenellis Granite outcrop. Carn 1\larth, Carn Brea, Tregonning and St A total area of 330 km2 was surveyed, 1100 Michael's l\lount; (2) abundance of porphyry gravimeter readings being taken at an average dykes and productive veins within the area; (3) density of 0.9 stations per km2 - this being intensity of mineralisation and concentration of increased some tenfold in areas of indicated emanative centres (Hosking, 1964, 1966) around thin slate cover. Two boreholes were drilled and between granite outcrops; and (4) interpretative to examine postulated granite cusps and control afforded by underground and commercial abbreviated geological logs of these have been drilling information. published (IGS, 1973). Gravity data maps and full borehole logs were placed on open file in In the structurally complex and lithologically the offices of the Institute in London, Exeter, variable setting of Cornwall detailed gravimetric Leeds and Edinburgh on the date of publication surveys were considered to offer the speediest of this note. and least ambiguous method of defining the large r irregularities of the granite surface. Supporting A detailed account of the results obtained regional geochemical studies were not attempted will be published in due cou rse. because of widespread surface contamination from former mining activities. I3AGKGROUND Hosking (1969) recently restated the belief GEOPHYSICAL :\IEASUREMENTS that most of the economically important tin, Gravity observations were made initially at deposits of Cornwall occured as vein swarms Ordnance Survey benchmarks and spot heights within, or crose to, the apices of granitic at a density of approximately one station per CliSpS or in ,rrnjor vein structures flanking km2 by use of a vehicle-borne gravity meter, granite ridges. If this generalisation is true, In two areas selected for detailed ,,;urvey graviT.Y it follows that the location of concealed granitic and levelling traverses were made on foot along cusps and ridges could provide valuable guidance roads and tracks and, occasionally, fields to in exploration for hypothermal ore bodies. give the required density of cover. Worden and La Coste and Romberg gravity meters were used. The form of the' batholith roof is imperfectly known. Widely spaced gravimetric observations After correction for gravity meter drift and (Bott, Day and l\lasson Smith, 1958) indicated tides, observed gravity values were derived by the large-scale relief and small-amplitude the use of. the existing IGS gravity base net and a ridges have been demonstrated in South Crofty value of 981. 265 gal at PendUlum House, Cambridge. mine (l\lacAlister, 1903) and in recent drilling Combined eleva;.ion corrections to sea-level and nort.h of Redruth. Circumstantial geological a partial terrain correction were made with a and minerological evidence prompted Hosking density of 2.67 g cm- 3, and the preliminary (l!.lG!:)) to postulate the positions of subsurface Bouguer anomaly was obtained by subtracting gl'anite ridges; but, hitherto, there has been normal gravity according to the 1930 lnte rnai.icr,;;.l no attempt to verify or modify the model. Gravity Formula (recently compiled data now ITrans. lnst. l\Iin. Metall. B., Vol. 84, pp. 1925. .so 60 70 80 .so .so SCAlf o S 6. 7 8 9 10 K~ TRURO + .leh.dy RfDRUIH + Crofty Mine ....... t~r;~::. 'J"8,e-q:"" + GWENNAP Po'COIC S .. Y'!-.~=I • HQ~D!on .so 70 80 Fig. 1. Location map showing granite outcrops, SW England 2 obtainable from IGS incorporate a full terrain 'PRELIMINARY RESULTS correction and the 1967 IGF). The Bouguer A refined model of the subsurface granite anomaly is dominated by the negative trough form awaits detailed computer processing of following the Cornubian granite chain, but where all available geophysical and geological data, the granite is covered by kUlas, the anomaly but semi-quantitative analysis of the Bouguer becomes relatively positive because the killas anomaly and residual Bouguer anomaly maps has a higher average density than the underlying indicates a pattern of relief differing somewhat granite. Before the Bouguer anomaly can be from published postulations. used to determine killas thickness, the gravitational effect of the killas must be An extension of the Carn Brea - Carn Arthen separated from that of the granite. To achieve - Pendarves granite ridge can be traced south this the Bouguer anomaly over areas of exposed westwards to meet a northern prolongation of granite is used to deduce the cross section of the Tregonning-Godolphin ridge. The Bosworgy the batholith in th~se areas. The effect of a borehole was sited in the vicinity of this inter­ fictitious batholith,.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    39 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us