An Active Bacterial Community Linked to High Chl-A Concentrations In

An Active Bacterial Community Linked to High Chl-A Concentrations In

The ISME Journal (2017) 11, 2345–2355 © 2017 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/17 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE An active bacterial community linked to high chl-a concentrations in Antarctic winter-pack ice and evidence for the development of an anaerobic sea-ice bacterial community Eeva Eronen-Rasimus1,2, Anne-Mari Luhtanen1,2,3, Janne-Markus Rintala2,4, Bruno Delille5, Gerhard Dieckmann6, Antti Karkman4,7 and Jean-Louis Tison8 1Marine Research Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland; 2Tvärminne Zoological Station, University of Helsinki, Hanko, Finland; 3Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland ; 4Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; 5Department of Astrophysics, Geophysics and Oceanography, Unité d’Océanographie Chimique, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium; 6Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany; 7Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland and 8Departement of Geosciences, Environnement et Société (DGES), Laboratoire de Glaciologie, DGES, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium Antarctic sea-ice bacterial community composition and dynamics in various developmental stages were investigated during the austral winter in 2013. Thick snow cover likely insulated the ice, leading to high (o4 μgl–1) chlorophyll-a (chl-a) concentrations and consequent bacterial production. Typical sea-ice bacterial genera, for example, Octadecabacter, Polaribacter and Glaciecola, often abundant in spring and summer during the sea-ice algal bloom, predominated in the communities. The variability in bacterial community composition in the different ice types was mainly explained by the chl-a concentrations, suggesting that as in spring and summer sea ice, the sea-ice bacteria and algae may also be coupled during the Antarctic winter. Coupling between the bacterial community and sea-ice algae was further supported by significant correlations between bacterial abundance and production with chl-a. In addition, sulphate-reducing bacteria (for example, Desulforhopalus) together with odour of H2S were observed in thick, apparently anoxic ice, suggesting that the development of the anaerobic bacterial community may occur in sea ice under suitable conditions. In all, the results show that bacterial community in Antarctic sea ice can stay active throughout the winter period and thus possible future warming of sea ice and consequent increase in bacterial production may lead to changes in bacteria-mediated processes in the Antarctic sea-ice zone. The ISME Journal (2017) 11, 2345–2355; doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.96; published online 14 July 2017 Introduction (for example, the Antarctic Peninsula) in which the surface ice temperatures are increasing and ice Antarctic sea ice is an important component of the extent decreasing (Stammerjohn et al., 2008; Southern Ocean ecosystem from both the geophysi- Comiso, 2010). Also, the inter-annual variation in cal and biogeochemical standpoints. It covers vast 6 2 sea ice is high: for example, in 2017 during February areas from 3 × 10 km during the sea-ice minimum 6 2 6 2 minimum sea ice extent was 2.35 × 10 km , which in February up to 18.3 × 10 km in the September was 24.4%, below the 1981–2010 average (NOAA, maximum (Comiso, 2010). In contrast to the dimin- 2017). ishing sea ice extent in the Arctic (Perovich et al., In the Southern Ocean, dynamic sea-ice growth 2014), Antarctic sea ice is globally expanding (IPCC, through the pancake ice (PCI) cycle and deformed 2013). However, this encompasses a large spatial growth (for example, rafting) is common (Lange heterogeneity meaning that there are indeed areas et al., 1989; Haas, 2010; Petrich and Eicken, 2010). In addition, the thick snow cover and dynamic Correspondence: E Eronen-Rasimus, Marine Research Centre, growth cause flooding, which introduces additional Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Erik Palmenin aukio 1, nutrients from seawater to the surface and internal PO Box 140, Helsinki 00251, Finland. ice horizons (Lange et al., 1990; Eicken et al., 1994; E-mail: [email protected] Received 21 December 2016; revised 2 May 2017; accepted Fritsen et al., 1994). These physical events induce a 6 May 2017; published online 14 July 2017 more distributed algal biomass than in the Arctic, Antarctic pack-ice bacterial communities E Eronen-Rasimus et al 2346 that is, with chlorophyll-a (chl-a) peaks in the upper autochthonous substrate for bacteria. During the and middle horizons of the sea-ice cover, in addition spring and summer seasons, copiotrophic (that is, to the more prevalent bottom-ice maxima (Meiners bacteria adapted to growing best in nutrient-rich et al., 2012; Arrigo, 2014). The highest chl-a environments) Gammaproteobacteria (for example, concentrations in Antarctic sea ice occur during genera Glaciecola and Colwellia) dominate the spring and summer. However, unlike in the Arctic, bacterial communities, together with copiotrophic peaks in chl-a are also observed in autumn (Fritsen Flavobacteriia (for example, genera Polaribacter and et al., 1994; Delille et al., 2002; Meiners et al., 2012). Flavobacterium) and Alphaproteobacteria (for exam- Sea-ice algae, together with sea-ice bacteria are the ple, genus Octadecabacter) both in first-year ice most productive and abundant organisms in ice. As (FYI) and multiyear ice (Bowman et al., 1997, 2012; in the water column, bacteria in sea ice drive an Brown and Bowman, 2001; Junge et al., 2002; active microbial loop, in which dissolved organic Brinkmeyer et al., 2003; Kaartokallio et al., 2008; matter is recycled back to the upper trophic levels as Deming, 2010; Hatam et al., 2014, 2016; Eronen- bacterial biomass (Kottmeier et al., 1987; Smith and Rasimus et al., 2015). Clement, 1990; Laurion et al., 1995; Kaartokallio, In contrast to spring and summer, bacterial 2004; Cowie et al., 2014). In addition, bacteria communities during winter are poorly known. decompose particulate organic matter and reminer- Members of the oligotrophic Alphaproteobacteria alize nutrients (Sullivan and Palmisano, 1984; of the SAR11 clade dominate the sea-ice bacterial Deming, 2010). Sea-ice bacteria and their community communities in the upper ice column during the structure are governed by abiotic and biotic factors Arctic winter and remain nearly unchanged until the such as temperature, salinity, light, substrate and algal mass accumulation in spring (Collins et al., nutrient availability, as well as grazing and viral lysis 2010). In newly formed Antarctic sea ice, bacterial (Kaartokallio, 2004; Mock and Thomas, 2005; Kuosa activity is temporarily suppressed and later restored and Kaartokallio, 2006; Riedel et al., 2007; Collins after consolidation of the sea ice (Grossmann and et al., 2008, 2010; Piiparinen and Kuosa, 2011; Dieckmann, 1994; Helmke and Weyland, 1995). Collins, 2015). As the fluctuation of these factors is With the consolidation of ice, psychrophilic highly seasonal, they also induce the seasonal (that is, bacteria that grow best at temperatures dynamics of bacterial abundance and community close to freezing point) predominante over psychro- composition in sea ice. tolerant (that is, bacteria that tolerate cold tempera- Most sea-ice bacterial community studies have tures) bacteria, which indicates change in been conducted during spring and summer, when community structure during winter (Helmke and the sea-ice algal mass growth provides ample Weyland, 1995). However, the Antarctic wintertime 55˚S 60˚S 486 488 515 489 65˚S 517 493 496 506a 503 506b 500 70˚S 75˚S Ocean Data View 50˚W 40˚W 30˚W 20˚W 10˚W 0˚ Figure 1 Map of the study area in the Weddell Sea, showing the sampling stations during the Antarctic Winter Ecosystem Climate Study (AWECS, leg ANT-XXIX/6) expedition. The map was generated with Ocean Data View (https://odv.awi.de; Schlitzer, 2016). The ISME Journal Antarctic pack-ice bacterial communities E Eronen-Rasimus et al 2347 bacterial community structure has not been was taken for the bacterial production measure- described to date, because the available information ments. For the bacterial diversity analyses, direct is limited to isolated bacterial strains (Brinkmeyer melting (Helmke and Weyland, 1995; Kaartokallio, et al., 2003). 2004) was used to avoid external DNA or nutrient In this study, we describe the bacterial community contamination of the samples. dynamics in the different developmental stages of winter-pack ice in Antarctica. Understanding the community dynamics allows us to assess the Bacterial abundance (flow cytometer) biogeochemical role played by bacteria during The samples for bacterial abundance were fixed with periods of ice cover and provide insights on the paraformaldehyde (final concentration 1%). The potential consequences of climate change on the cells were stained with SYBR Green I (Sigma-Aldrich biogeochemical cycles and food webs of ice- Inc, St Louis, MO, USA) at a final dilution of 1:10 000 covered seas. for 15 min in the dark and analysed with a CyFlow Cube8 flow cytometer (Partek GmbH, Münster, Germany) using a 488-nm laser (Gasol and Del Materials and methods Giorgio, 2000) within 30 min of staining. Study site, sampling and environmental variables The samples were collected from 10 pack-ice stations along the Weddell and Lazarev Seas during Bacterial production Bacterial production was measured as the incorpora- the Antarctic Winter

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us