Studies on Barbula Consanguinea 17

Studies on Barbula Consanguinea 17

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Studies on Barbula consanguinea 17 Tropical Bryology 19: 17-23, 2000 Studies on Barbula consanguinea (Thw. & Mitt.) Jaeg. sensu Eddy, a pan-tropical species Philip Sollman Von Weberstraat 32, 6904 KD Zevenaar, The Netherlands Abstract. Barbula consanguinea (Thw. & Mitt.) Jaeg. sensu Eddy is considered as a pan-tropical species. This taxon is reported new for several central African countries, the Arabian peninsula, and Middle America. This variable species is shortly discussed and compared with (most) related taxa. Hymenostylium crispulum Broth. & Par. and Barbula obscura Sull. (= Barbula wrightii Sauerb.) are considered as synonyms of Barbula consanguinea. Introduction In addition, the holotype of Barbula Over the last few years, the author has studied consanguinea was studied (NY!). I agree with many herbarium collections, mainly held in L, Saito (1975: 495), that the plants belong to which belong to Barbula consanguinea, mostly Barbula javanica Dozy & Molk. No admixture collected in tropical Asia. is present in the studied holotype material. Eddy (1990: 178) realized that Barbula However, the concept presented in the Asian consanguinea is a (very) variable species. floras of Bartram (1939), Chen (1941), Fleischer Furthermore, the species is rather commonly (1904), Gangulee (1972) is consistent and distributed, at least in tropical Asia. different. This is the reason why I follow this line, Type material of this taxon was also studied, viz. also present in Eddy’s flora, so sensu Eddy. the isotypes present in BM, GRO, H. In several For the moment, Barbula consanguinea is the cases, the isotype material consisted of mixtures oldest name for several taxa which are closely of two (related) taxa, viz. Barbula javanica Dozy related, in my opinion idential. & Molk. and Barbula consanguinea sensu Eddy (Eddy 1990). Material and method Furthermore, the isotype material in the Brotherus In total, about 200 collections were studied, filed herbarium (H) is very sparse. This collection was and often annotated. All the material present in annotated by B.C. Tan in 1983 as Barbula indica herbarium L was examined. (Hook.) Spreng. However, in my opinion, this Furthermore, most plants were studied several material is better referred to a smaller (younger) times. state of Barbula consanguinea (sensu Eddy). In addition, selected material from the herbaria TROPICAL BRYOLOGY 19 (2000) 18 Sollman BM, CANB, H-BR., MELU-Stone, NSW, NY questionably distinct from Barbula subcomosa was inspected. ...”. Various type collections, belonging to this - However, in my opinion, both taxa are clearly Hydrogonium-group, were also examined. distinct. In Barbula javanica the laminal cells are All the material was studied wet under the clearly mammillose, the cells pellucid. In Barbula microscope. Field survey on this species, were subcomosa, on the contrary, the laminal cells are done in 1993 in Australia (Queensland) and the clearly pluripapillose and obscure, especially in Philippines (Luzon). the upper parts of the (upper) leaves, among other differences between these two taxa. Description, discussion, figures The description, key characters and also the This species is well described, discussed and illustration (fig. 9, 1-o) in Norris and Koponen illustrated especially by Eddy (1990: 178-180). (1989) clearly refer to Barbula javanica Dozy & Furthermore, Barbula consanguinea is well Molk. described and figured by Fleischer (1904: 348- 350), although no gemmae are mentioned. Illustrations Hilpert (1933: 625, 627) discusses Barbula Akiyama (1996), p. 159, fig. 1; Bartram (1939), consanguinea shortly. plate 9, fig. 142; Chen (1941) p. 240, fig. 45: 1- The species is not illustrated here. 3, as Hydrogonium consanguineum; Gao (1996), Bartram (1939: 119) gave a good, but rather short p. 208, fig. 71: 1-3, as Hydrogonium description. consanguineum; Eddy (1990), p. 179, fig. 278; The figure (plate 9, fig. 142) is very concise. Fleischer (1904), p. 349, fig. 63; Gangulee Chen (1941: 240, Abb. 45, 1-3) gave only a short (1972), p. 733, fig. 348, as Hydrogonium discussion and a plate. However, in the text below consanguineum. several -Hydrogonium- taxa, Chen (l.c.) compared several species with each other and Variation with Barbula consanguinea. Most variation was seen in: Gangulee (1972: 729) gave a good description 1. general tinge and figure. The plants are commonly tan coloured, more Saito (1975: 493) gave mainly a good description, rarely (dull) green in the upper part. illustration and discussion as Barbula subcomosa 2. height Broth. However, in his description (p. 493) the Commonly about 1.5 cm. Ranging from c. (0.5) phrases “laminal cells ... rarely smooth ...” and 1 to 3 cm, rarely larger (up to c. 5 cm). “costa ... ending below apex ...” are not 3. general leaf outline appropriate for this taxon. In Saito (1972: 11) Commonly lingulate to triangular. The better the observed variation on the gemmae is developed leaves ofter tapering from near base especially discussed and illustrated (also as to apex; in younger leaves not so pronounced. Barbula subcomosa). Furthermore, in my 4. leaf length opinion, Barbula subcomosa Broth. is identical Commonly about 2 mm long. Ranging from with Barbula consanguinea sensu Eddy. rather small to longer c. 1.5 - 2.2 mm. The In Noguchi (1988: 299-301) Barbula subcomosa variation here is sometimes considerable even in Broth. is described as laminal cells “... one tuft. mammillose ...”(idem in the key and also fig. 125, 5. apical region of the leaves A). However, this is not correct. The laminal cells Commonly circa cuspidate. Ranging from in this taxon are clearly pluripapillose. broadly rounded (mucronate) to small acute. The Norris and Koponen (1989: 118-119) listed variation can be present in one tuft, more rarely Barbula consanguinea as a synonym below even on one plant. Barbula javanica. They followed Saito (1975: 6. narrowly revolute leaf margins just above leaf 495), without any further comment. In their base discussion (l.c. p. 119) below Barbula javanica, Commonly narrowly recurved just above they suggested that “... Barbula javanica is leafbase, at least in some leaves; more rarely TROPICAL BRYOLOGY 19 (2000) Studies on Barbula consanguinea 19 narrow recurved to about halfway up (in some 10. back of the costa leaves). Rather rarely most leaves plane or nearly Commonly strongly papillose and also partly so. double papillose, from apex to near base. More 7. density of the laminal papillae in the upper rarely, the papillae are not so pronounced (on part of the (upper) leaves. some leaves). The laminal cells in this region are clearly densely 11. axillary gemmae pluripapillose, obscuring the lumen. However, They are constantly present, although sometimes there is some variation present - especially scarce. Commonly stalked ovoid, ellipsoid, between collections- in the density of the laminal clavate, or fusiform, multicellular, greenish to papillae. (dark) brownish with age. More rarely also 8. excurrent part of the costa locally bulging/knobby, to forked/branched. Commonly shortly excurrent: (1) 2-4 smooth Part of the observed variation is discussed and cells. Sometimes hardly excurrent on several illustrated by Saito (1972:11), as Barbula leaves and/or broken, especially on older leaves. subcomosa Broth. 9. extreme leaf apex (entire- indented- somewhat Interesting collection studied: denticulate) Australia, Queensland, (W. of Cairns), Mungana, Commonly entire to somewhat indented or on earth, near mine, 19 Aug. 1979, I.G. Stone (slightly) denticulate in this region. However, this 15.933, det. Ph. Sollman, Jan. 1999, hb. MELU. condition is often variably expressed in This number shows a remarkable variation in collections examined. gemmae shapes. Tab. 1: Differences between Barbula indica and B. consanguinea. Barbula indica Barbula consanguinea general height: to about plants commonly larger, to about 1 cm; small plants 3 cm; seldom somewhat higher general tinge: commonly commonly tan coloured dull (darker) green leaf margins parallel leaf margins commonly tapering from near base to apex leaf margins often narrowly leaf margins often only slightly recurved from near base to narrowly recurved below, at least halfway, or more in some (larger) leaves; sometimes almost plane leaf apex broadly rounded leaf apex commonly more acute (acuminate-cuspidate), in some younger states often more broadly rounded excurrent point of the costa excurrent point of the costa very short, mostly 1 cell often, more pronounced: (1) 2-4 cells peristome teeth about straight peristome teeth clearly twisted TROPICAL BRYOLOGY 19 (2000) 20 Sollman 12. fragility of the leaves In Barbula unguiculata they are (very) low, More or less fragile plants occur rather regularly, mostly present in the apex region (only). On the especially the older parts. Sometimes this contrary, in Barbula consanguinea they are condition is rather pronounced, with almost only commonly far more pronounced, from apex to the costa intact. near base. Plants encrusted with lime occur also now and In addition, the geographical ranges of both then. taxa are different. Barbula unguiculata is mainly present in the temperate region. Barbula Comparison consanguinea is mainly a pantropical species. Some, small non-fruiting states of Barbula However, in some regions their ranges can come consanguinea resemble Barbula indica (Hook.) close or overlap

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us