Humanitarian Intervention 44 2.1 Humanitarian Intervention – from the 19 Th Century to the League of Nations

Humanitarian Intervention 44 2.1 Humanitarian Intervention – from the 19 Th Century to the League of Nations

Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris ECOLE DOCTORALE DE SCIENCES PO Doctorat en Science politique CERI – Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Internationales Programme doctoral de Relations internationales FROM STATE SOVEREIGNTY TO RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT Maria Rita MAZZANTI Thèse dirigée par M. Ghassan SALAME Professeur des Universités à l’IEP de Paris Soutenue le 22 janvier 2013 Jury : M. Rony BRAUMAN , Professeur des universités associé, IEP de Paris, M. Frédéric CHARILLON (Rapporteur), Professeur de Science Politique, Faculté de droit de Clermont-Ferrand, Université d'Auvergne et directeur de l'Institut de Recherche Stratégique de l'École Militaire (IRSEM - Ministère de la Défense) M. Jean-Marc de LA SABLIÈRE, Ambassadeur de France en Italie (2007-2011) et Représentant permanent de la France auprès des Nations Unies (2002-2007), M. Ghassan SALAME (Directeur) Professeur des universités, IEP de Paris M. Olivier De SCHUTTER (Rapporteur), Professeur Ordinaire, Faculté de droit et de criminologie, Université catholique de Louvain Maria Rita Mazzanti -“From State Responsibility to Responsibility to Protect”- Thèse IEP de Paris – Année 2012/201 1 Maria Rita Mazzanti -“From State Responsibility to Responsibility to Protect”- Thèse IEP de Paris – 2 Année 2012/2013 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 5 THE CHANGING NATURE OF SOVEREIGNTY 12 1.1 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE A SYSTEM OF SOVEREIGN STATES ...................................................................... 13 1.2 SOVEREIGNTY AND THE LEGACY OF WORLD WAR II ..................................................................................... 26 1.3 HUMAN RIGHTS .............................................................................................................................................. 32 1.4 THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMES .......................................................... 36 1.5 THE HUMANIZATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ............................................................................................. 40 1.6 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 42 HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION 44 TH 2.1 HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION – FROM THE 19 CENTURY TO THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS ....................... 44 2.2 FROM THE UN CHARTER TO THE “E RA OF HUMANITARIAN EMERGENCES ” ............................................... 49 2.3 IRAQ 1991 ...................................................................................................................................................... 59 2.4 SOMALIA 1992-1993 .................................................................................................................................... 64 2.5 RWANDA 1993-1994 ................................................................................................................................... 68 2.6 THE YUGOSLAV WARS 1991-1999 .............................................................................................................. 73 2.7 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 85 FROM SOVEREIGNTY AS RESPONSIBILITY TO RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT 88 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 88 3.1 ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE R2P ..................................................................................................... 89 3.2 FROM 2006 TO THE APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARY -GENERAL BAN KI-MOON ........................................ 102 3.3 R2P DEFINITION : WHAT IS IN AND WHAT IS OUT ? .................................................................................... 129 3.4 R2P AS A CONCEPT ...................................................................................................................................... 135 3.5 R2P AS AN EMERGING LEGAL NORM ........................................................................................................... 137 3.6 THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY ......................................................................................................................... 151 3.7 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 154 LIBYA 158 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 158 4.1 THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ............................................................................................................. 161 4.2 CIVIL SOCIETY ............................................................................................................................................... 171 4.3 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 175 ANNEX I: TIMELINE OF EVENTS FEBRUARY – AUGUST 2011 ........................................................................... 178 ANNEX II: INDICATOR INDEXES ........................................................................................................................... 235 CÔTE D’IVOIRE 240 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 240 5.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................. 242 5.2 THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ............................................................................................................. 246 5.3 THE AFRICAN REGIONAL AND SUB -REGIONAL RESPONSE .......................................................................... 254 5.4 CIVIL SOCIETY ............................................................................................................................................... 260 5.5 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 262 ANNEX I TIMELINE OF EVENTS ............................................................................................................................ 268 ANNEX II THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT ............................................................................................. 285 SRI LANKA 287 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 287 6.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................. 290 6.2 THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ............................................................................................................. 293 6.3 CIVIL SOCIETY ............................................................................................................................................... 304 6.4 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 308 ANNEX 1 TIMELINE OF EVENTS ........................................................................................................................... 310 Maria Rita Mazzanti -“From State Responsibility to Responsibility to Protect”- Thèse IEP de Paris – Année 2012/201 3 SYRIA 315 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 315 7.1 THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ............................................................................................................. 317 7.2 REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 338 7.3 CIVIL SOCIETY ............................................................................................................................................... 343 7.4 CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 345 ANNEX 1 TIMELINE OF EVENTS ........................................................................................................................... 348 CONCLUSION 383 BIBLIOGRAPHY 408 A) BOOKS .......................................................................................................................................................... 408 B) ARTICLES ...................................................................................................................................................... 412 C) UNITED NATIONS DOCUMENTS ........................................................................................................... 430 D) NEWS SOURCES (PRINTED PRESS , AGENCIES , AND WEB SOURCES ): ....................................................... 435 Maria Rita Mazzanti -“From State Responsibility to Responsibility to Protect”- Thèse IEP de Paris – 4 Année 2012/2013 INTRODUCTION The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is an emerging international norm that provides that states are primary

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    436 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us