Hovercraft Feasibility Study

Hovercraft Feasibility Study

Hovercraft Feasibility Study San Francisco Water Emergency Transportation Authority AECOM Project number: 60617240 WETA Contract number: 19-008 November 30, 2020 Hovercraft Feasibility Study Prepared for: San Francisco Water Emergency Transportation Authority Pier 9 The Embarcadero #111 San Francisco, CA 94111 Prepared by: AECOM 300 Lakeside Drive Suite 400 Oakland, CA 94612 aecom.com San Francisco Water Emergency Transportation Authority AECOM Hovercraft Feasibility Study Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Stakeholder Outreach ............................................................................................................... 2 2. Hovercraft Technology ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Overview of Hovercraft Technology Update ............................................................................. 4 2.2 Commercial Hovercraft Models, Costs, and Fuel Consumption .............................................. 4 2.3 Hovercraft Maintenance Costs ................................................................................................. 5 2.4 Crew Size ................................................................................................................................. 6 3. Phase 2 Routes and Operating Cost Modeling .................................................................................. 7 3.1 Phase 2 Routes ........................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Travel Speeds and Times ......................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Refined Operating Cost Analysis .............................................................................................. 9 4. Ridership, Fare, and Annual Cost Analysis ...................................................................................... 11 4.1 Ridership Analysis .................................................................................................................. 11 4.2 Fares ....................................................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Annual Operating Cost per Route .......................................................................................... 12 5. Environmental Considerations .......................................................................................................... 13 5.1 Engine Requirements ............................................................................................................. 13 5.2 Emissions Analysis ................................................................................................................. 13 5.3 Noise and Habitat Impacts in Phases 1 and 2 ....................................................................... 14 6. Capital Costs and Site Selection ...................................................................................................... 15 6.1 Terminal Site Locations and Capital Costs ............................................................................. 15 6.2 Maintenance and Overnight Storage Facility Needs and Capital Costs ................................ 24 6.3 Hovercraft Purchase Capital Costs ........................................................................................ 25 7. Certification Processes and Project Timelines ................................................................................. 26 7.1 Staff Training and Certification ............................................................................................... 26 7.2 Craft Certification Process ...................................................................................................... 26 7.3 Hovercraft Project Timeline .................................................................................................... 26 8. Funding and Financing Analysis ....................................................................................................... 28 8.1 Funding and Financing a Hovercraft Service ......................................................................... 28 8.2 Public Funding and Financing Opportunities .......................................................................... 30 8.3 Case Studies of Public-Private Partnerships in Public Transit Delivery ................................. 35 8.4 Funding and Financing Scenario Modeling ............................................................................ 37 9. Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................... 40 – WETA Recent Operating Costs ............................................................................................ 41 – Initial Long List of Routes in Phase 1 ................................................................................... 43 B.1 Vallejo ..................................................................................................................................... 44 B.2 Martinez/Antioch (Carquinez Strait) ....................................................................................... 44 B.3 Hercules/Pinole Area .............................................................................................................. 44 B.4 Richmond ................................................................................................................................ 44 B.5 Berkeley .................................................................................................................................. 45 B.6 Oakland/Alameda ................................................................................................................... 45 B.7 Downtown San Francisco ....................................................................................................... 46 B.8 San Francisco and Oakland Airports ...................................................................................... 48 B.9 South San Francisco .............................................................................................................. 48 San Francisco Water Emergency Transportation Authority AECOM i Hovercraft Feasibility Study B.10 San Leandro ........................................................................................................................... 49 B.11 Foster City .............................................................................................................................. 49 B.12 East Dumbarton Bridge .......................................................................................................... 49 B.13 West Dumbarton Bridge and Cooley Landing ........................................................................ 50 B.14 Mountain View Area ................................................................................................................ 51 B.15 Alviso ...................................................................................................................................... 52 B.16 Coyote Creek/Mud Slough ..................................................................................................... 52 – Ridership Model Validation and Initial Forecasts ................................................................. 53 C.1 2010 Validation ....................................................................................................................... 53 C.2 2020 Validation ....................................................................................................................... 53 C.3 Initial Forecasts....................................................................................................................... 54 – Noise Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 58 D.1 Airborne Sound ....................................................................................................................... 58 D.2 Possible Impacts of Airborne Noise ........................................................................................ 58 D.3 Underwater Sound .................................................................................................................. 61 D.4 Effects on Birds ....................................................................................................................... 61 D.5 Hydroacoustic Threshold Criteria for Fish Species ................................................................ 62 D.6 Hydroacoustic Threshold Criteria for Marine Mammals ......................................................... 63 – South Bay Environmental Constraints .................................................................................. 65 E.1 Site Specific Environmental Constraints: Protected Species and Habitat ............................. 66 – Emissions Analysis ............................................................................................................... 68 F.1 Emissions Methodologies ....................................................................................................... 68 F.2 Emissions Assumptions .......................................................................................................... 69

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    98 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us